Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T5800 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T5300

Intel Core 2 Duo T5900

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 is a Merom based dual core processor for laptops. It was later succeeded by the Penryn based Core 2 Duo T6600, which is produced in 45nm and due to core enhancements a bit faster.

Intel Core 2 Duo T5800

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core 2 Duo T5800 is an entry level dual core processor based on the old Merom core. It features a reduced level 2 cache to 2 MB and no virtualization functions. Furthermore, the clock rate of 2 GHz is relatively slow.

Intel Core 2 Duo T5300

► remove from comparison

ModelIntel Core 2 Duo T5900Intel Core 2 Duo T5800Intel Core 2 Duo T5300
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenameMeromMeromMerom
Series: Core 2 Duo Merom
Intel Core 2 Duo T78002.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T77002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T76002.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T75002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T74002.16 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T59002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T73002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58502.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58702 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T72002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T72502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T57502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L77001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP77001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T71001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T56001.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T55501.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T55001.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T53001.73 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP75001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T52001.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L75001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L73001.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L71001.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T78002.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T77002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T76002.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T75002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T74002.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T59002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T73002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58502.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58702 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T72002 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T58002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T72502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T57502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L77001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP77001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T71001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T56001.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T55501.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T55001.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T53001.73 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP75001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T52001.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L75001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L73001.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L71001.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T78002.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T77002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T76002.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T75002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T74002.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T59002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T73002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58502.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58702 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T72002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T72502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T57502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L77001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP77001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T71001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T56001.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T55501.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T55001.66 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T53001.73 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP75001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T52001.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L75001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L73001.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L71001.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock2200 MHz2000 MHz1730 MHz
FSB800800533
L1 Cache128 KB
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 22 / 2
TDP35 Watt35 Watt34 Watt
Technology65 nm65 nm65 nm
SocketSocket PPPGA478
FeaturesMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, Enhanced Intel SpeedStep Technology (EIST), Intel 64, XD bit (an NX bit implementation), iAMT2 (Intel Active Management), TXTMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, Enhanced Intel SpeedStep Technology (EIST), Intel 64, XD bit (an NX bit implementation), iAMT2 (Intel Active Management), TXT
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Transistors291 Million
Die Size143 mm2
max. Temp.85 °C
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo T5800

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 T5900 +
min: 2116     avg: 2123     median: 2123 (19%)     max: 2130 Points
94%
1 T5800 +
min: 1988     avg: 2000     median: 2000 (18%)     max: 2013 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 T5900 +
min: 3894     avg: 3997     median: 3997 (5%)     max: 4100 Points
93%
1 T5800 +
min: 3714     avg: 3755     median: 3716 (5%)     max: 3835 Points
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 T5900 +
min: 1838     avg: 1864     median: 1864 (4%)     max: 1890 Points
88%
1 T5800 +
min: 1629     avg: 1640     median: 1639.5 (3%)     max: 1650 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 T5900 +
26 s (6%)
99%
1 T5800 +
min: 28.06     avg: 28.5     median: 28.5 (6%)     max: 28.9 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
65 s (3%)
min: 69.6     avg: 90.3     median: 90.3 (4%)     max: 111 s
84 s (4%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 T5800 +
min: 1511     avg: 1521     median: 1520.5 (7%)     max: 1530 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 T5900 +
18700 MIPS (9%)
75%
1 T5800 +
min: 11028     avg: 14012     median: 14011.5 (7%)     max: 16995 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 T5900 +
14000 MFLOPS (11%)
73%
1 T5800 +
min: 7694     avg: 10270     median: 10270 (8%)     max: 12846 MFLOPS
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 T5900 +
4639 Points (29%)
108%
1 T5800 +
min: 4286     avg: 4884     median: 5025 (32%)     max: 5340 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 T5800 +
4.9 Points (70%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 T5800 +
3533 Points (4%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 → 100% n=1

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T5800 → 99% n=1

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T5300 → 99% n=1

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.17
log 16. 11:22:48

#0 checking url part for id 439 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 438 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 327 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 11 Aug 2022 13:13:36 +0200 +0s ... 0.001s

#5 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.005s ... 0.006s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#7 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#8 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#9 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#10 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#11 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#24 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.007s

#25 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.007s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#30 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.007s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#32 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.007s

#33 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.007s

#34 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.007s

#35 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.007s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#50 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.007s

#51 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.007s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#57 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.007s

#58 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.007s

#59 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.007s

#60 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.007s

#61 composed specs +0s ... 0.007s

#62 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#63 getting avg benchmarks for device 439 +0s ... 0.007s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#65 got single benchmarks 439 +0.007s ... 0.015s

#66 getting avg benchmarks for device 438 +0s ... 0.015s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.016s

#68 got single benchmarks 438 +0.019s ... 0.035s

#69 getting avg benchmarks for device 327 +0s ... 0.035s

#70 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.035s

#71 got single benchmarks 327 +0.007s ... 0.043s

#72 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.043s

#73 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.043s

#74 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.044s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#76 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.044s

#77 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.045s

#78 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#79 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#80 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#81 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.045s

#82 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#83 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.045s

#84 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.046s

#85 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#86 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.046s

#87 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.046s

#88 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.047s

#89 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#90 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.047s

#91 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#92 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.047s

#93 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.048s

#94 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#95 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.048s

#96 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.048s

#97 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#98 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.049s

#99 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#100 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#101 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.049s

#102 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#103 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.049s

#104 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#105 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#106 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.05s

#107 return log +0s ... 0.05s

Please share our article, every link counts!
.170
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)