, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Intel Core 2 Duo T5850 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T7500

Intel Core 2 Duo T5850

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core 2 Duo T5850 is an entry level dual core processor for laptops based on the old Merom core. It offers only an FSB of 667 MHz and 2 MB level 2 cache.

Intel Core 2 Duo T7500

► remove from comparison Intel T7500

The Core 2 Duo T7500 is a middle class dual core CPU for laptops. It is based on the Merom core and features 4MB Level 2 cache.

At the time of announcement, the T7500 was a very fast CPU and had enough performance for games and applications in 2008. In 2009, the Core 2 Duo T7500 performed similar to a middle class Core 2 Duo P7570 or Turion II Ultra M640/M660.

Modern Penryn based Core  2 Duo are a bit faster per MHz (with similar Cache sizes) and are more power efficient.

Intel Core 2 Duo T5850Intel Core 2 Duo T7500
Intel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
MeromMerom
Series: Core 2 Duo Merom
Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7600 compare2.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T75002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 compare2.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 compare2 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T58502.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5870 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5800 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5750 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7100 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5600 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5550 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5500 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5300 compare1.73 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5200 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7300 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7100 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7600 compare2.33 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T75002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 compare2.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58502.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5870 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5800 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5750 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7100 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5600 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5550 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5500 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5300 compare1.73 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5200 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7300 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7100 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
2100 MHz2200 MHz
667800
2 MB4 MB
2 / 22 / 2
34 35
65 65 1.075 - 1.250V
Architecturex86x86
128 KB
291
143 mm2
100 °C
PBGA479, PPGA478
Virtualization (VT-x), Intel 64, Idle States, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable Bit
$234 U.S.
Intel Core 2 Duo T7500

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 T7500 +
min: 0.93     avg: 1     median: 1 (2%)     max: 1.12 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
2161 (19%)
min: 2190     avg: 2304     median: 2307.5 (21%)     max: 2389
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
3997 (6%)
min: 4182     avg: 4284     median: 4272.5 (7%)     max: 4473
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 T7500 +
37.5 s (8%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
1768 Points (10%)
min: 1634     avg: 1879     median: 1906 (11%)     max: 1940 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
27 s (6%)
min: 22     avg: 22.7     median: 23 (5%)     max: 23 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
66 s (3%)
min: 54     avg: 54.6     median: 54.6 (2%)     max: 55.271 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1518 s (7%)
1344 s (6%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
19664 MIPS (9%)
min: 19950     avg: 20064     median: 20063.5 (10%)     max: 20177 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
13902 MFLOPS (11%)
min: 13944     avg: 13945     median: 13945 (11%)     max: 13946 MFLOPS
PCMark 04 - PCMark 04 - Standard
100%
1 T7500 +
5984 Points (80%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
4516 Points (28%)
min: 2095     avg: 4545     median: 4629 (29%)     max: 5785 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
5.1 Points (73%)
5.1 Points (73%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T5850 → 100% n=10

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 → 103% n=10

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.16
log 24. 11:03:36

#0 checking url part for id 440 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 322 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 22 Jul 2021 13:08:31 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.008s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 440 +0s ... 0.008s

#7 got single benchmarks 440 +0.007s ... 0.015s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 322 +0s ... 0.016s

#9 got single benchmarks 322 +0.041s ... 0.057s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.057s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.008s ... 0.065s

#12 return log +0.025s ... 0.09s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)