The Intel Core 2 Duo T5750 is an entry level dual core processor based on the old Merom core. It features a reduced level 2 cache to 2 MB and no virtualization functions. Furthermore, the clock rate of 2 GHz is relatively slow. Compared to the minimal faster T5800, the T5750 features only a 667 MHz clocked FSB.
The Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 was a mid range dual core processor for laptops. It is based on the old Merom core featuring only 2 MB level 2 cache and Virtualization functions VT-x. The similar called T7200 offers a larger level 2 cache (4MB) and a lower clocked FSB and therefore is a bit faster on the average. However, due to the smaller cache and the lower core voltage, the T7250 should be a bit more power efficient.
The Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 is compareable to the Core 2 Extreme X7800 but featuring a lower TDP and a fixed multiplicator. It is a middle class dual core cpu in 2009 (at the time of announcement it was one of the fastest). Later the Penryn based Core 2 Duo CPUs succeeded the T7800.
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T5750 → 100%n=3
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 → 99%n=3
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 → 111%n=3
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card - Average benchmark values for this graphics card * Smaller numbers mean a higher performance 1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
log 30. 15:56:03
#0 checking url part for id 407 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 340 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 339 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 27 Nov 2023 15:30:04 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.02s ... 0.021s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.021s
#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 407 +0.003s ... 0.024s
#8 got single benchmarks 407 +0.028s ... 0.052s
#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 340 +0.003s ... 0.055s
#10 got single benchmarks 340 +0.039s ... 0.094s
#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 339 +0.003s ... 0.097s
#12 got single benchmarks 339 +0.01s ... 0.106s
#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.106s
#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.084s ... 0.19s