The Intel Core 2 Duo T5750 is an entry level dual core processor based on the old Merom core. It features a reduced level 2 cache to 2 MB and no virtualization functions. Furthermore, the clock rate of 2 GHz is relatively slow. Compared to the minimal faster T5800, the T5750 features only a 667 MHz clocked FSB.
The Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 was a mid range dual core processor for laptops. It is based on the old Merom core featuring only 2 MB level 2 cache and Virtualization functions VT-x. The similar called T7200 offers a larger level 2 cache (4MB) and a lower clocked FSB and therefore is a bit faster on the average. However, due to the smaller cache and the lower core voltage, the T7250 should be a bit more power efficient.
The Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 was a mid range dual core processor for laptops. It is based on the old Merom core featuring the full 4 MB level 2 cache nad Virtualization functions VT-x.
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T5750 → 100%n=3
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 → 99%n=3
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 → 100%n=3
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card - Average benchmark values for this graphics card * Smaller numbers mean a higher performance 1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
v1.26
log 03. 08:40:14
#0 checking url part for id 407 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 340 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 324 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 02 Dec 2023 15:30:08 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.022s ... 0.023s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.023s
#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 407 +0.003s ... 0.027s
#8 got single benchmarks 407 +0.038s ... 0.065s
#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 340 +0.003s ... 0.068s
#10 got single benchmarks 340 +0.051s ... 0.119s
#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 324 +0.004s ... 0.123s
#12 got single benchmarks 324 +0.085s ... 0.207s
#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.207s
#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.121s ... 0.328s