The Intel Core 2 Duo T5600 is an entry-level dual core processor for laptops. It is based on the Merom core and therefore manufactured in 65nm. Compared to the C2D T5670, the T5600 features Virtualization functions VT-x, but lacks Idle Stats (according to the Intel HP).
The Core 2 Duo T7600 is a middle class dual core CPU for laptops. It is based on the Merom core and features 4MB Level 2 cache.
At the time of announcement, the T7600 was a very fast CPU and had enough performance for games and applications in 2008. In 2009, the Core 2 Duo T7600 performed similar to a middle class Core 2 Duo P7570 or Turion II Ultra M640/M660.
Modern Penryn based Core 2 Duo are a bit faster per MHz (with similar Cache sizes) and are more power efficient (due to the 45nm process).
The Intel Core 2 Duo T5870 is an entry level dual core processor based on the old Merom core. It features a reduced level 2 cache to 2 MB and no virtualization functions. Furthermore, the clock rate of 2 GHz is relatively slow.
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T5600 → 100%n=7
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7600 → 113%n=7
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T5870 → 101%n=7
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card - Average benchmark values for this graphics card * Smaller numbers mean a higher performance 1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
log 27. 09:13:40
#0 checking url part for id 171 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 162 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 442 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 25 Mar 2023 14:08:33 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.022s ... 0.023s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.023s
#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 171 +0.002s ... 0.025s
#8 got single benchmarks 171 +0.034s ... 0.059s
#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 162 +0.002s ... 0.061s
#10 got single benchmarks 162 +0.023s ... 0.084s
#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 442 +0.002s ... 0.086s
#12 got single benchmarks 442 +0.015s ... 0.101s
#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.101s
#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.094s ... 0.195s