Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo T5600 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T5800

Intel Core 2 Duo T5600

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core 2 Duo T5600 is an entry-level dual core processor for laptops. It is based on the Merom core and therefore manufactured in 65nm. Compared to the C2D T5670, the T5600 features Virtualization functions VT-x, but lacks Idle Stats (according to the Intel HP).

Intel Core 2 Duo T5800

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core 2 Duo T5800 is an entry level dual core processor based on the old Merom core. It features a reduced level 2 cache to 2 MB and no virtualization functions. Furthermore, the clock rate of 2 GHz is relatively slow.

ModelIntel Core 2 Duo T5600Intel Core 2 Duo T5800
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenameMeromMerom
Series: Core 2 Duo Merom
Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7600 compare2.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 compare2.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5850 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5870 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5750 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7100 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T56001.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5550 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5500 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5300 compare1.73 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5200 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7300 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7100 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7600 compare2.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 compare2.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5850 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5870 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 compare2 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T58002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5750 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7100 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T56001.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5550 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5500 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5300 compare1.73 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5200 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7300 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7100 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock1830 MHz2000 MHz
FSB667800
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP34 Watt35 Watt
Transistors291 Million291 Million
Technology65 nm, 1.0375V-1.300V65 nm
Die Size143 mm2143 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C85 °C
SocketPBGA479, PPGA478PPGA478
FeaturesVirtualization VT-x, Enhanced Speedstep, Intel 64, Execute Disable BitMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, Enhanced Intel SpeedStep Technology (EIST), Intel 64, XD bit (an NX bit implementation), iAMT2 (Intel Active Management), TXT
Architecturex86x86
$241 U.S.
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo T5600Intel Core 2 Duo T5800

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 T5800 +
min: 1988     avg: 2000     median: 2000 (18%)     max: 2013 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 T5800 +
min: 3714     avg: 3755     median: 3716 (5%)     max: 3835 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 T5600 +
48.8 s (10%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 1540     avg: 1560     median: 1559.5 (3%)     max: 1579 Points
min: 1629     avg: 1640     median: 1639.5 (3%)     max: 1650 Points
Sysmark 2004SE - Sysmark 2004SE Score
100%
1 T5600 +
215 Points (83%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
31 s (7%)
min: 28.06     avg: 28.5     median: 28.5 (6%)     max: 28.9 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
79 s (3%)
min: 69.6     avg: 90.3     median: 90.3 (4%)     max: 111 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1818 s (8%)
min: 1511     avg: 1521     median: 1520.5 (7%)     max: 1530 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
min: 16812     avg: 18676     median: 16959 (8%)     max: 22256 MIPS
min: 11028     avg: 14012     median: 14011.5 (7%)     max: 16995 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
min: 8209     avg: 10449     median: 11471 (9%)     max: 11667 MFLOPS
min: 7694     avg: 10270     median: 10270 (8%)     max: 12846 MFLOPS
Cinebench 9 Score - Cinebench 9 Score
100%
1 T5600 +
561 Points (38%)
SPEC CPU2000 int - SPEC CPU2000 int
100%
1 T5600 +
1792 Points (74%)
SPEC CPU2000 fp - SPEC CPU2000 fp
100%
1 T5600 +
1740 Points (79%)
PCMark 04 - PCMark 04 - Standard
100%
1 T5600 +
min: 5153     avg: 5868     median: 5902 (79%)     max: 6347 Points
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
min: 3579     avg: 4104     median: 4157 (26%)     max: 4522 Points
min: 4286     avg: 4884     median: 5025 (32%)     max: 5340 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 T5800 +
4.9 Points (70%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 T5800 +
3533 Points (3%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T5600 → 100% n=7

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T5800 → 100% n=7

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.18
log 06. 11:49:41

#0 checking url part for id 171 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 438 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 05 Oct 2022 13:14:23 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.005s ... 0.005s

#5 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#7 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#8 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#9 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#10 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#11 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#25 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#26 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#31 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#33 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.007s

#34 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.007s

#35 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.007s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.007s

#37 composed specs +0s ... 0.007s

#38 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#39 getting avg benchmarks for device 171 +0s ... 0.007s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.008s

#41 got single benchmarks 171 +0.019s ... 0.027s

#42 getting avg benchmarks for device 438 +0s ... 0.027s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.028s

#44 got single benchmarks 438 +0.022s ... 0.05s

#45 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.05s

#46 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#47 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.051s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#50 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.051s

#51 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.052s

#52 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.052s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.052s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.052s

#55 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.053s

#56 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.053s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#58 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.054s

#59 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.054s

#60 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.054s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#62 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.055s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#64 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.055s

#65 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.055s

#66 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.055s

#67 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.055s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#69 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.056s

#70 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.056s

#71 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.056s

#72 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.056s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#74 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.056s

#75 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.057s

#76 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.057s

#77 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.058s

#78 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.058s

#79 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.058s

#80 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.059s

#81 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.06s

#82 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.06s

#83 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.06s

#84 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.06s

#85 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#86 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.06s

#87 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.061s

#88 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.061s

#89 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.061s

#90 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.061s

#91 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.026s ... 0.088s

#92 return log +0.004s ... 0.091s

Please share our article, every link counts!
.170
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)