Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo T5500 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T5800

Intel Core 2 Duo T5500

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core 2 Duo T5550 is an entry-level dual core processor for laptops. It is based on the Merom-2M core and therefore manufactured in 65nm. It does not support Virtualization functions VT-x of the Merom core and offers only a low clock speed and 2MB level 2 cache.

Intel Core 2 Duo T5800

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core 2 Duo T5800 is an entry level dual core processor based on the old Merom core. It features a reduced level 2 cache to 2 MB and no virtualization functions. Furthermore, the clock rate of 2 GHz is relatively slow.

show full text
ModelIntel Core 2 Duo T5500Intel Core 2 Duo T5800
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenameMeromMerom
Series: Core 2 Duo Merom
Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7600 compare2.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 compare2.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5850 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5870 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5750 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7100 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5600 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5550 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T55001.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5300 compare1.73 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5200 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7300 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7100 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7600 compare2.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 compare2.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5850 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5870 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 compare2 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T58002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5750 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7100 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5600 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5550 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T55001.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5300 compare1.73 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5200 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7300 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7100 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock1660 MHz2000 MHz
FSB667800
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP34 Watt35 Watt
Transistors291 Million291 Million
Technology65 nm1.0375-1.3V65 nm
Die Size143 mm2143 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C85 °C
SocketPBGA479, PPGA478PPGA478
Architecturex86x86
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo T5500Intel Core 2 Duo T5800
FeaturesMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, Enhanced Intel SpeedStep Technology (EIST), Intel 64, XD bit (an NX bit implementation), iAMT2 (Intel Active Management), TXT

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 1656     avg: 1717     median: 1660 (15%)     max: 1836 Points
min: 1988     avg: 2000     median: 2000 (18%)     max: 2013 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 3026     avg: 3190     median: 3069 (4%)     max: 3476 Points
min: 3714     avg: 3755     median: 3716 (5%)     max: 3835 Points
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 1339     avg: 1387     median: 1392 (3%)     max: 1426 Points
min: 1629     avg: 1640     median: 1639.5 (3%)     max: 1650 Points
Sysmark 2004SE - Sysmark 2004SE Score
100%
1 T5500 +
204 Points (78%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 31.34     avg: 32.7     median: 32.7 (7%)     max: 34 s
min: 28.06     avg: 28.5     median: 28.5 (6%)     max: 28.9 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
83 s (4%)
min: 69.6     avg: 90.3     median: 90.3 (4%)     max: 111 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1923 s (9%)
min: 1511     avg: 1521     median: 1520.5 (7%)     max: 1530 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
min: 15145     avg: 16727     median: 15195 (7%)     max: 19840 MIPS
min: 11028     avg: 14012     median: 14011.5 (7%)     max: 16995 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
min: 7386     avg: 9338     median: 10261 (8%)     max: 10367 MFLOPS
min: 7694     avg: 10270     median: 10270 (8%)     max: 12846 MFLOPS
Cinebench 9 Score - Cinebench 9 Score
100%
1 T5500 +
532 Points (36%)
PCMark 04 - PCMark 04 - Standard
100%
1 T5500 +
min: 4776     avg: 5083     median: 4898 (66%)     max: 5787 Points
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
min: 2916     avg: 3353     median: 3323 (21%)     max: 3992 Points
min: 4286     avg: 4884     median: 5025 (32%)     max: 5340 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 T5800 +
4.9 Points (70%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 T5800 +
3533 Points (4%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T5500 → 100% n=9

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T5800 → 112% n=9

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 03. 16:29:58

#0 checking url part for id 174 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 438 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 02 Jul 2022 13:13:02 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.006s ... 0.006s

#5 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#7 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.007s

#8 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.007s

#9 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.007s

#10 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.007s

#11 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.007s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#25 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.007s

#26 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.007s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#31 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.007s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#33 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.007s

#34 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.007s

#35 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.008s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.008s

#37 composed specs +0s ... 0.008s

#38 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#39 getting avg benchmarks for device 174 +0s ... 0.008s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.009s

#41 got single benchmarks 174 +0.03s ... 0.039s

#42 getting avg benchmarks for device 438 +0.001s ... 0.04s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.041s

#44 got single benchmarks 438 +0.019s ... 0.059s

#45 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.059s

#46 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#47 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.06s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.06s

#50 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.061s

#51 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.061s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.061s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.061s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.061s

#55 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.061s

#56 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.061s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.061s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#59 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.062s

#60 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.062s

#61 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.062s

#62 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.062s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.063s

#64 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.063s

#65 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.063s

#66 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.064s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.064s

#68 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.064s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.064s

#70 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.064s

#71 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.065s

#72 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.065s

#73 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.065s

#74 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.065s

#75 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.065s

#76 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.065s

#77 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.065s

#78 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.065s

#79 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.065s

#80 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.065s

#81 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.066s

#82 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.067s

#83 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.068s

#84 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.068s

#85 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.068s

#86 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.068s

#87 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.068s

#88 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.068s

#89 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.068s

#90 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.068s

#91 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.068s

#92 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.069s

#93 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.069s

#94 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.069s

#95 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.069s

#96 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.028s ... 0.097s

#97 return log +0.004s ... 0.1s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)