Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo T5300 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T7700

Intel Core 2 Duo T5300

► remove from comparison

Intel Core 2 Duo T7700

The Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 was the fastest Merom based Core 2 Duo with 35 Watt TDP (the Core 2 Extreme was faster, but featured a higher TDP). The Penryn based successor (e.g. Core 2 Duo T8300) is a bit faster at the same clock speed.

ModelIntel Core 2 Duo T5300Intel Core 2 Duo T7700
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenameMeromMerom
Series: Core 2 Duo Merom
Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T77002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7600 compare2.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 compare2.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5850 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5870 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5800 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5750 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7100 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5600 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5550 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5500 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T53001.73 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5200 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7300 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7100 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T77002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7600 compare2.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 compare2.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5850 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5870 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5800 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5750 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7100 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5600 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5550 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5500 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T53001.73 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5200 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7300 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7100 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock1730 MHz2400 MHz
FSB533800
L2 Cache2 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP34 Watt34 Watt
Technology65 nm65 nm
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Transistors291 Million
Die Size143 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C
SocketPBGA479, PPGA478
FeaturesVirtualization (VT-x), Intel 64, Idle States, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable Bit
$307 U.S.
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo T7700

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 T7700 +
min: 2505     avg: 2553     median: 2553.5 (23%)     max: 2598 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 T7700 +
min: 4573     avg: 4620     median: 4620 (6%)     max: 4665 Points
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 T7700 +
min: 1946     avg: 2040     median: 2058 (4%)     max: 2108 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 T7700 +
min: 20     avg: 20.8     median: 21 (5%)     max: 21.74 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
84 s (4%)
min: 49.55     avg: 52     median: 52.2 (2%)     max: 54 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 T7700 +
1266 s (6%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 T7700 +
22156 MIPS (11%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 T7700 +
15341 MFLOPS (12%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 T7700 +
min: 4014     avg: 5302     median: 5400.5 (34%)     max: 6458 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 T7700 +
5.3 Points (76%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T5300 → 100% n=1

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 → 101% n=1

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.18
log 29. 15:46:31

#0 checking url part for id 327 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 323 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 25 Sep 2022 13:14:15 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.003s ... 0.004s

#5 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.005s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#7 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.005s

#8 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#9 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#10 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#11 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.007s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#25 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.007s

#26 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.007s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#31 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.007s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#33 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.007s

#34 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.007s

#35 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.007s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.007s

#37 composed specs +0s ... 0.007s

#38 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#39 getting avg benchmarks for device 327 +0s ... 0.007s

#40 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.008s

#41 got single benchmarks 327 +0.009s ... 0.017s

#42 getting avg benchmarks for device 323 +0s ... 0.017s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.018s

#44 got single benchmarks 323 +0.026s ... 0.044s

#45 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.044s

#46 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.045s

#47 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.045s

#48 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.045s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#51 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.045s

#52 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.046s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.046s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#56 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.046s

#57 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.046s

#58 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.046s

#59 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.046s

#60 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.046s

#61 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.046s

#62 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.046s

#63 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.046s

#64 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.046s

#65 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.047s

#66 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.047s

#67 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.047s

#68 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.047s

#69 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.047s

#70 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.048s

#71 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.048s

#72 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.048s

#73 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.049s

#74 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#76 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#77 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#78 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#79 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#80 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.05s

#81 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.051s

#82 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#83 return log +0.004s ... 0.055s

Please share our article, every link counts!
.170
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)