The Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 was a mid range dual core processor for laptops. It is based on the old Merom core featuring only 2 MB level 2 cache and Virtualization functions VT-x. The similar called T7200 offers a larger level 2 cache (4MB) and a lower clocked FSB and therefore is a bit faster on the average. However, due to the smaller cache and the lower core voltage, the T7250 should be a bit more power efficient.
The Core 2 Duo T7600 is a middle class dual core CPU for laptops. It is based on the Merom core and features 4MB Level 2 cache.
At the time of announcement, the T7600 was a very fast CPU and had enough performance for games and applications in 2008. In 2009, the Core 2 Duo T7600 performed similar to a middle class Core 2 Duo P7570 or Turion II Ultra M640/M660.
Modern Penryn based Core 2 Duo are a bit faster per MHz (with similar Cache sizes) and are more power efficient (due to the 45nm process).
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T5200 → 100%n=4
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 → 115%n=4
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7600 → 124%n=4
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card - Average benchmark values for this graphics card * Smaller numbers mean a higher performance 1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
log 22. 19:26:53
#0 checking url part for id 328 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 340 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 162 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 20 Mar 2023 14:08:30 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.018s ... 0.019s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.019s
#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 328 +0.002s ... 0.021s
#8 got single benchmarks 328 +0.012s ... 0.033s
#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 340 +0.002s ... 0.034s
#10 got single benchmarks 340 +0.039s ... 0.074s
#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 162 +0.002s ... 0.076s
#12 got single benchmarks 162 +0.024s ... 0.1s
#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.1s
#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.052s ... 0.152s