Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Pentium Dual Core T4400 vs Intel Pentium Dual Core T4200

Intel Pentium Dual Core T4400

► remove from comparison Intel T4400

The Intel Pentium T4400 (or Intel Pentium Dual-Core T4400) is an entry level dual-core CPU for laptops. Compared to the Core 2 Duo CPUs, the T4400 has only 1 MB Level 2 cache and some power saving technology is deactivated. 

Therefore, the power consumption in idle mode should be a bit above similar clocked Core 2 Duo CPUs. Furtheremore, virtualization technology VT-x is also not available for the T4400.

Due to the slow clock rate and the small level 2 cache, the Pentium T4400 will limit the performance of demanding 3D games (e.g. Supreme Commander). For entry level applications like office, SD video cutting, image processing, Internet and casual gaming, the T4400 should be sufficient.

The Pentium T4400 is based on the Intel Penryn core and features 2 integer units, 1 floating point unit, 1 load unit, and 1 store unit in a 14-step pipeline. 

Intel Pentium Dual Core T4200

► remove from comparison

The Intel Pentium T4200 (or Intel Pentium Dual-Core T4200) is an entry level dual-core CPU for laptops. Compared to the Core 2 Duo CPUs, the T4200 has only 1 MB Level 2 cache and some power saving technology is deactivated. 

Intel® Pentium® Processors do not support the following features:

  • Intel® Virtualization Technology
  • Intel® Dynamic Acceleration
  • Intel® Dynamic FSB Frequency Switching
  • C3E
  • Deeper Sleep State (C4)
  • Intel® Enhanced Deeper Sleep State

Therefore, the power consumption in idle mode should be a bit above similar clocked Core 2 Duo CPUs. Furtheremore, virtualization technology VT-x is also not available for the T4200.

Due to the slow clock rate and the small level 2 cache, the Pentium T4200 will limit the performance of demanding 3D games (e.g. Sumpreme Commander). For entry level applications like office, SD video cutting, image processing, Internet and casual gaming, the T4200 should be sufficient.

The Pentium T4200 is based on the Intel Penryn core and features 2 integer units, 1 floating point unit, 1 load unit, and 1 store unit in a 14-step pipeline. 

show full text
ModelIntel Pentium Dual Core T4400Intel Pentium Dual Core T4200
SeriesIntel Pentium Dual CoreIntel Pentium Dual Core
CodenamePenrynPenryn
Series: Pentium Dual Core Penryn
Intel Pentium Dual Core T4500 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Dual Core T4400 « 2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Dual Core T4300 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Dual Core T42002 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Dual Core SU4100 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Dual Core T4500 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Dual Core T44002.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Dual Core T4300 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Dual Core T4200 « 2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Dual Core SU4100 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock2200 MHz2000 MHz
FSB800800
L1 Cache128 KB128 KB
L2 Cache1 MB1 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP35 Watt35 Watt
Transistors410 Million410 Million
Technology45 nm, 1.05-1.15V45 nm
Die Size107 mm2107 mm2
SocketPGA478PG478
FeaturesMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, Enhanced Intel SpeedStep Technology (EIST), Intel 64, XD bit, iAMT2 (Intel Active Management), TXTMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, Enhanced Intel SpeedStep Technology (EIST), Intel 64, XD bit, iAMT2 (Intel Active Management), TXT
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.com
max. Temp.105 °C

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 2200     avg: 2231     median: 2231 (13%)     max: 2262 Points
min: 1976     avg: 2014     median: 2013 (12%)     max: 2040 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 4191     avg: 4227     median: 4200 (3%)     max: 4289 Points
min: 3489     avg: 3751     median: 3801 (3%)     max: 3856 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
1203 s (14%)
min: 1236     avg: 1643     median: 1242 (15%)     max: 2451 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
38.2 s (8%)
min: 39     avg: 51.4     median: 39.3 (8%)     max: 76 s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 1850     avg: 1890     median: 1897 (4%)     max: 1915 Points
min: 1578     avg: 1660     median: 1636 (3%)     max: 1784 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 26.4     avg: 26.6     median: 26.6 (6%)     max: 26.8 s
min: 22     avg: 25     median: 25 (5%)     max: 28 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 61     avg: 61.1     median: 61.1 (3%)     max: 61.1 s
min: 54     avg: 58.7     median: 54 (2%)     max: 68 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1489 s (7%)
min: 1341     avg: 1606     median: 1747 (8%)     max: 1830 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
min: 18500     avg: 19350     median: 19350 (9%)     max: 20200 MIPS
min: 18119     avg: 18259     median: 18259 (9%)     max: 18399 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
15800 MFLOPS (12%)
min: 14415     avg: 14562     median: 14561.5 (11%)     max: 14708 MFLOPS
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 T4200 +
min: 3910     avg: 4188     median: 4110.5 (8%)     max: 4756 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 T4200 +
min: 4.9     avg: 5     median: 5 (71%)     max: 5.1 Points
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
3724 Points (3%)
3434 Points (3%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Pentium Dual Core T4400 → 100% n=11

Average Benchmarks Intel Pentium Dual Core T4200 → 95% n=11

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 19. 15:16:39

#0 checking url part for id 565 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 456 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 19 Apr 2024 05:38:49 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.01s ... 0.011s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.011s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 565 +0.003s ... 0.014s

#7 got single benchmarks 565 +0.029s ... 0.043s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 456 +0.002s ... 0.045s

#9 got single benchmarks 456 +0.067s ... 0.112s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.112s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.081s ... 0.193s

#12 return log +0.026s ... 0.219s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)