Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Pentium Dual Core T4300 vs Intel Pentium Dual Core T4400

Intel Pentium Dual Core T4300

► remove from comparison Intel T4300

The Intel Pentium T4300 (or Intel Pentium Dual-Core T4300) is an entry level dual-core CPU for laptops. Compared to the Core 2 Duo CPUs, the T4300 has only 1 MB Level 2 cache and some power saving technology is deactivated. 

Intel® Pentium® Processors do not support the following features:

  • Intel® Virtualization Technology
  • Intel® Dynamic Acceleration
  • Intel® Dynamic FSB Frequency Switching
  • C3E
  • Deeper Sleep State (C4)
  • Intel® Enhanced Deeper Sleep State

Therefore, the power consumption in idle mode should be a bit above similar clocked Core 2 Duo CPUs. Furtheremore, virtualization technology VT-x is also not available for the T4300.

Due to the slow clock rate and the small level 2 cache, the Pentium T4300 will limit the performance of demanding 3D games (e.g. Sumpreme Commander). For entry level applications like office, SD video cutting, image processing, Internet and casual gaming, the T4300 should be sufficient.

The Pentium T4300 is based on the Intel Penryn core and features 2 integer units, 1 floating point unit, 1 load unit, and 1 store unit in a 14-step pipeline. 

Intel Pentium Dual Core T4400

► remove from comparison Intel T4400

The Intel Pentium T4400 (or Intel Pentium Dual-Core T4400) is an entry level dual-core CPU for laptops. Compared to the Core 2 Duo CPUs, the T4400 has only 1 MB Level 2 cache and some power saving technology is deactivated. 

Therefore, the power consumption in idle mode should be a bit above similar clocked Core 2 Duo CPUs. Furtheremore, virtualization technology VT-x is also not available for the T4400.

Due to the slow clock rate and the small level 2 cache, the Pentium T4400 will limit the performance of demanding 3D games (e.g. Supreme Commander). For entry level applications like office, SD video cutting, image processing, Internet and casual gaming, the T4400 should be sufficient.

The Pentium T4400 is based on the Intel Penryn core and features 2 integer units, 1 floating point unit, 1 load unit, and 1 store unit in a 14-step pipeline. 

show full text
ModelIntel Pentium Dual Core T4300Intel Pentium Dual Core T4400
SeriesIntel Pentium Dual CoreIntel Pentium Dual Core
CodenamePenrynPenryn
Series: Pentium Dual Core Penryn
Intel Pentium Dual Core T4500 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Dual Core T44002.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Dual Core T4300 « 2.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Dual Core T4200 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Dual Core SU4100 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Dual Core T4500 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Dual Core T4400 « 2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Dual Core T43002.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Dual Core T4200 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Dual Core SU4100 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock2100 MHz2200 MHz
FSB800800
L1 Cache128 KB128 KB
L2 Cache1 MB1 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP35 Watt35 Watt
Transistors410 Million410 Million
45 nm, 1.05-1.15V45 nm, 1.05-1.15V
Die Size107 mm2107 mm2
SocketPGA478PGA478
FeaturesMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, Enhanced Intel SpeedStep Technology (EIST), Intel 64, XD bit, iAMT2 (Intel Active Management), TXTMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, Enhanced Intel SpeedStep Technology (EIST), Intel 64, XD bit, iAMT2 (Intel Active Management), TXT
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 2153     avg: 2243     median: 2242 (14%)     max: 2335 Points
min: 2200     avg: 2231     median: 2231 (13%)     max: 2262 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 3963     avg: 4148     median: 4057 (3%)     max: 4425 Points
min: 4191     avg: 4227     median: 4200 (3%)     max: 4289 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 T4300 +
4415 Points (3%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 T4300 +
2040 Points (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
1252 s (15%)
1203 s (14%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
39 s (8%)
38.2 s (8%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 1692     avg: 1798     median: 1825 (4%)     max: 1848 Points
min: 1850     avg: 1890     median: 1897 (4%)     max: 1915 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 22     avg: 25.3     median: 26 (6%)     max: 28 s
min: 26.4     avg: 26.6     median: 26.6 (6%)     max: 26.8 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 54     avg: 62.3     median: 64 (3%)     max: 69 s
min: 61     avg: 61.1     median: 61.1 (3%)     max: 61.1 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 1341     avg: 1469     median: 1528 (7%)     max: 1539 s
1489 s (7%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
min: 17767     avg: 18550     median: 18550 (9%)     max: 19333 MIPS
min: 18500     avg: 19350     median: 19350 (9%)     max: 20200 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
min: 13927     avg: 14231     median: 14231 (11%)     max: 14535 MFLOPS
15800 MFLOPS (12%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 T4300 +
min: 5.3     avg: 5.4     median: 5.4 (69%)     max: 5.4 Points
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 3590     avg: 3788     median: 3787.5 (3%)     max: 3985 Points
3724 Points (3%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Pentium Dual Core T4300 → 100% n=11

Average Benchmarks Intel Pentium Dual Core T4400 → 102% n=11

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 25. 16:20:52

#0 checking url part for id 490 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 565 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 25 Apr 2024 05:38:32 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.012s ... 0.013s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.013s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 490 +0.003s ... 0.016s

#7 got single benchmarks 490 +0.032s ... 0.048s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 565 +0.003s ... 0.05s

#9 got single benchmarks 565 +0.029s ... 0.08s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.08s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.084s ... 0.163s

#12 return log +0.033s ... 0.196s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)