Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Pentium Dual Core T3400 vs Intel Pentium Dual Core T3200

Intel Pentium Dual Core T3400

► remove from comparison

The Intel Pentium T3400 is an entry-level dual core processor based on the old Merom core. Compared to Core 2 Duo CPUs, the Pentium brand offers less level 2 cache and some reduced power saving functions. Still the Pentium offers more power saving as a Celeron counterpart. Hardware Virtualization is also deactivated in the core.

Intel Pentium Dual Core T3200

► remove from comparison

The Intel Pentium T3200 (or Intel Pentium Dual-Core T3200) is an entry level dual-core CPU for laptops. Compared to the Core 2 Duo CPUs, the T3200 has only 1 MB Level 2 cache and some power saving technology is deactivated. It is based on the older Merom core (compared to the T4200 that is based on the Penryn core).

Due to the slow clock rate and the small level 2 cache, the Pentium T3200 will limit the performance of demanding 3D games (e.g. Sumpreme Commander). For entry level applications like office, SD video cutting, image processing, Internet and casual gaming, the T4200 should be sufficient.

 

ModelIntel Pentium Dual Core T3400Intel Pentium Dual Core T3200
SeriesIntel Pentium Dual CoreIntel Pentium Dual Core
CodenameMeromMerom
Series: Pentium Dual Core Merom
Intel Pentium Dual Core T3400 « 2.16 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Dual Core T32002 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Dual Core T2410 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Dual Core T2390 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Dual Core T2370 compare1.73 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Dual Core T2330 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Dual Core T2310 compare1.46 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Dual Core T34002.16 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Dual Core T3200 « 2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Dual Core T2410 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Dual Core T2390 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Dual Core T2370 compare1.73 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Dual Core T2330 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Dual Core T2310 compare1.46 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock2160 MHz2000 MHz
FSB667667
L2 Cache1 MB1 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP35 Watt35 Watt
Transistors291 Million291 Million
65 nm, 1.075V-1.175V65 nm, 1.075V-1.175V
Die Size143 mm2143 mm2
SocketPPGA478
FeaturesMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, Enhanced Intel SpeedStep Technology (EIST), Intel 64, XD bit (an NX bit implementation), iAMT2 (Intel Active Management), TXTMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, Enhanced Intel SpeedStep Technology (EIST), Intel 64, XD bit (an NX bit implementation)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
max. Temp.100 °C

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 T3400 +
min: 2022     avg: 2026     median: 2026 (12%)     max: 2030 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 3803     avg: 3817     median: 3816.5 (3%)     max: 3830 Points
3600 Points (3%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 T3400 +
38.5 s (8%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 T3400 +
min: 1770     avg: 1779     median: 1779 (4%)     max: 1789 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 T3400 +
min: 29.36     avg: 29.8     median: 29.8 (6%)     max: 30.3 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 T3400 +
73 s (3%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 T3400 +
18440 MIPS (9%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 T3400 +
13910 MFLOPS (11%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 T3400 +
4428 Points (9%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Pentium Dual Core T3400 → 100% n=1

Average Benchmarks Intel Pentium Dual Core T3200 → 94% n=1

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 23. 12:01:01

#0 checking url part for id 444 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 443 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 23 Apr 2024 05:40:15 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.012s ... 0.013s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.013s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 444 +0.003s ... 0.016s

#7 got single benchmarks 444 +0.028s ... 0.044s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 443 +0.003s ... 0.047s

#9 got single benchmarks 443 +0.026s ... 0.073s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.073s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.028s ... 0.101s

#12 return log +0.021s ... 0.122s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)