Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Pentium Dual Core T3200 vs Intel Pentium Dual Core T3400 vs Intel Pentium Dual Core T2370

Intel Pentium Dual Core T3200

► remove from comparison

The Intel Pentium T3200 (or Intel Pentium Dual-Core T3200) is an entry level dual-core CPU for laptops. Compared to the Core 2 Duo CPUs, the T3200 has only 1 MB Level 2 cache and some power saving technology is deactivated. It is based on the older Merom core (compared to the T4200 that is based on the Penryn core).

Due to the slow clock rate and the small level 2 cache, the Pentium T3200 will limit the performance of demanding 3D games (e.g. Sumpreme Commander). For entry level applications like office, SD video cutting, image processing, Internet and casual gaming, the T4200 should be sufficient.

 

Intel Pentium Dual Core T3400

► remove from comparison

The Intel Pentium T3400 is an entry-level dual core processor based on the old Merom core. Compared to Core 2 Duo CPUs, the Pentium brand offers less level 2 cache and some reduced power saving functions. Still the Pentium offers more power saving as a Celeron counterpart. Hardware Virtualization is also deactivated in the core.

Intel Pentium Dual Core T2370

► remove from comparison

The Intel Pentium Dual-Core T2370 is an entry level dual-core processor that was announced in 2008. It is based on the old Merom core with some deactivated features (power saving, Virtualization). Due to the low clock rate, the slow FSB, and the small level 2 cache, the performance is only suited for non-demanding tasks.

show full text
ModelIntel Pentium Dual Core T3200Intel Pentium Dual Core T3400Intel Pentium Dual Core T2370
SeriesIntel Pentium Dual CoreIntel Pentium Dual CoreIntel Pentium Dual Core
CodenameMeromMeromMerom
Series: Pentium Dual Core Merom
Intel Pentium Dual Core T34002.16 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Dual Core T3200 « 2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Dual Core T24102 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Dual Core T23901.86 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Dual Core T23701.73 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Dual Core T23301.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Dual Core T23101.46 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Dual Core T3400 « 2.16 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Dual Core T32002 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Dual Core T24102 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Dual Core T23901.86 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Dual Core T23701.73 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Dual Core T23301.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Dual Core T23101.46 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Dual Core T34002.16 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Dual Core T32002 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Dual Core T24102 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Dual Core T23901.86 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Dual Core T2370 « 1.73 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Dual Core T23301.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Dual Core T23101.46 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock2000 MHz2160 MHz1730 MHz
FSB667667533
L2 Cache1 MB1 MB1 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 22 / 2
TDP35 Watt35 Watt35 Watt
Transistors291 Million291 Million291 Million
65 nm, 1.075V-1.175V65 nm, 1.075V-1.175V65 nm, 1.075-1.175
Die Size143 mm2143 mm2143 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
FeaturesMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, Enhanced Intel SpeedStep Technology (EIST), Intel 64, XD bit (an NX bit implementation)MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, Enhanced Intel SpeedStep Technology (EIST), Intel 64, XD bit (an NX bit implementation), iAMT2 (Intel Active Management), TXTMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, Intel 64, EIST, XD-Bit
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.comark.intel.com
SocketPPGA478PPGA478

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 T3400 +
min: 2022     avg: 2026     median: 2026 (12%)     max: 2030 Points
79%
1 T2370 +
min: 1556     avg: 1601     median: 1600.5 (10%)     max: 1645 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
3600 Points (3%)
min: 3803     avg: 3817     median: 3816.5 (3%)     max: 3830 Points
min: 3030     avg: 3063     median: 3062.5 (2%)     max: 3095 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 T3400 +
38.5 s (8%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 T3400 +
min: 1770     avg: 1779     median: 1779 (4%)     max: 1789 Points
80%
1 T2370 +
min: 1393     avg: 1422     median: 1422.5 (3%)     max: 1450 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 T3400 +
min: 29.36     avg: 29.8     median: 29.8 (6%)     max: 30.3 s
98%
1 T2370 +
36.4 s (8%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 T3400 +
73 s (3%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 T3400 +
18440 MIPS (9%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 T3400 +
13910 MFLOPS (11%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 T3400 +
4428 Points (9%)
87%
1 T2370 +
min: 3370     avg: 3837     median: 3836.5 (8%)     max: 4303 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Pentium Dual Core T3200 → 100% n=1

Average Benchmarks Intel Pentium Dual Core T3400 → 106% n=1

Average Benchmarks Intel Pentium Dual Core T2370 → 85% n=1

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 24. 00:25:58

#0 checking url part for id 443 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 444 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 389 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 23 Apr 2024 05:40:15 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.018s ... 0.019s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.019s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 443 +0.002s ... 0.021s

#8 got single benchmarks 443 +0.024s ... 0.045s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 444 +0.002s ... 0.047s

#10 got single benchmarks 444 +0.019s ... 0.066s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 389 +0.002s ... 0.068s

#12 got single benchmarks 389 +0.015s ... 0.082s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.082s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.042s ... 0.124s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.124s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)