Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Pentium Dual Core T3200 vs Intel Pentium Dual Core T2330

Intel Pentium Dual Core T3200

The Intel Pentium T3200 (or Intel Pentium Dual-Core T3200) is an entry level dual-core CPU for laptops. Compared to the Core 2 Duo CPUs, the T3200 has only 1 MB Level 2 cache and some power saving technology is deactivated. It is based on the older Merom core (compared to the T4200 that is based on the Penryn core).

Due to the slow clock rate and the small level 2 cache, the Pentium T3200 will limit the performance of demanding 3D games (e.g. Sumpreme Commander). For entry level applications like office, SD video cutting, image processing, Internet and casual gaming, the T4200 should be sufficient.

 

Intel Pentium Dual Core T2330

► remove from comparison

ModelIntel Pentium Dual Core T3200Intel Pentium Dual Core T2330
SeriesIntel Pentium Dual CoreIntel Pentium Dual Core
CodenameMeromMerom
Series: Pentium Dual Core Merom
Intel Pentium Dual Core T3400 compare2.16 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Pentium Dual Core T32002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Pentium Dual Core T2410 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Pentium Dual Core T2390 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Pentium Dual Core T2370 compare1.73 GHz2 / 2
Intel Pentium Dual Core T23301.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Pentium Dual Core T2310 compare1.46 GHz2 / 2
Intel Pentium Dual Core T3400 compare2.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Pentium Dual Core T32002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Pentium Dual Core T2410 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Pentium Dual Core T2390 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Pentium Dual Core T2370 compare1.73 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Pentium Dual Core T23301.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Pentium Dual Core T2310 compare1.46 GHz2 / 2
Clock2000 MHz1600 MHz
FSB667533
L2 Cache1 MB1 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP35 Watt35 Watt
Transistors291 Million
Technology65 nm, 1.075V-1.175V65 nm
Die Size143 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C
FeaturesMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, Enhanced Intel SpeedStep Technology (EIST), Intel 64, XD bit (an NX bit implementation)MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, Intel 64, EIST, XD-Bit
Architecturex86x86
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Pentium Dual Core T3200

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 T2330 +
min: 1514     avg: 1532     median: 1538 (14%)     max: 1544 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
3600 Points (5%)
min: 2807     avg: 2855     median: 2869 (4%)     max: 2888 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 T2330 +
1620 s (19%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 T2330 +
51 s (10%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 T2330 +
min: 1266     avg: 1297     median: 1281 (3%)     max: 1344 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 T2330 +
min: 38     avg: 39.8     median: 38.5 (8%)     max: 42.84 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 T2330 +
2200 s (10%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 T2330 +
min: 2470     avg: 3226     median: 3379 (21%)     max: 3645 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 T2330 +
4.7 Points (67%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Pentium Dual Core T3200 → 100% n=1

Average Benchmarks Intel Pentium Dual Core T2330 → 80% n=1

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.18
log 03. 09:41:22

#0 checking url part for id 443 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 372 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 30 Sep 2022 13:14:19 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.002s

#5 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.004s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.004s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.004s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.004s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.004s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.004s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.004s

#13 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#14 composed specs +0s ... 0.004s

#15 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#16 getting avg benchmarks for device 443 +0s ... 0.004s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.005s

#18 got single benchmarks 443 +0.016s ... 0.021s

#19 getting avg benchmarks for device 372 +0s ... 0.021s

#20 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.022s

#21 got single benchmarks 372 +0.015s ... 0.037s

#22 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.037s

#23 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.037s

#24 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.038s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.038s

#26 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.038s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.038s

#28 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.038s

#29 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.039s

#30 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.039s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.039s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.039s

#33 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.04s

#34 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.04s

#35 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.04s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.04s

#37 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.04s

#38 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.04s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.04s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.04s

#41 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.04s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#44 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.041s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#46 return log +0.004s ... 0.045s

Please share our article, every link counts!
.170
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)