Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1600 vs Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1700 vs Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1500

Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1600

► remove from comparison

The Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1600 is a slow clocked entry level processor for cheap laptops. It is based on the old Merom core, but compared to Core 2 Duo processors, the T1700 offers less features of the architecture. For example power saving functions and hardware virtualization is not enabled. According to Intel the CPU does not support Enhanced Speedstep, but there are some versions in laptops that support the automatic downclocking.

Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1700

► remove from comparison

The Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1700 is a slow clocked entry level processor for cheap laptops. It is based on the old Merom core, but compared to Core 2 Duo processors, the T1700 offers less features of the architecture. For example power saving functions and hardware virtualization is not enabled. According to Intel the CPU does not support Enhanced Speedstep, but there are some versions in laptops that support the automatic downclocking.

Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1500

► remove from comparison

The Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1500 is a slow clocked entry level processor for cheap laptops. It is based on the old Merom core, but compared to Core 2 Duo processors, the T1700 offers less features of the architecture. For example power saving functions and hardware virtualization is not enabled. According to Intel the CPU does not support Enhanced Speedstep, but there are some versions in laptops that support the automatic downclocking.

ModelIntel Celeron Dual-Core T1600Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1700Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1500
SeriesIntel Celeron Dual-CoreIntel Celeron Dual-CoreIntel Celeron Dual-Core
CodenameMeromMeromMerom
Series: Celeron Dual-Core Merom
Intel Celeron Dual-Core T17001.83 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1600 « 1.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron Dual-Core T15001.87 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1700 « 1.83 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron Dual-Core T16001.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron Dual-Core T15001.87 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron Dual-Core T17001.83 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron Dual-Core T16001.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1500 « 1.87 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock1660 MHz1830 MHz1866 MHz
FSB667667533
L2 Cache1 MB1 MB512 KB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 22 / 2
TDP35 Watt35 Watt35 Watt
Transistors291 Million291 Million
65 nm, 1.075V-1.175V65 nm, 1.075V-1.175V65 nm, 1.075-1.175V
Die Size143 mm2143 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C100 °C
SocketPPGA478PPGA478
FeaturesIntel 64, eXIntel 64, eX, SSE3Intel 64, eX
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerprocessorfinder.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 T1700 +
1750 Points (11%)
93%
1 T1500 +
1625 Points (10%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
3000 Points (2%)
3270 Points (2%)
2960 Points (2%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
1350 Points (3%)
1456 Points (3%)
1400 Points (3%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
36 s (8%)
33.8 s (7%)
39 s (8%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 T1700 +
75 s (3%)
99%
1 T1500 +
91 s (4%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
14100 MIPS (7%)
15600 MIPS (7%)
15900 MIPS (8%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
10600 MFLOPS (8%)
11800 MFLOPS (9%)
12000 MFLOPS (9%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1600 → 100% n=5

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1700 → 108% n=5

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1500 → 106% n=5

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 25. 00:29:37

#0 checking url part for id 479 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 482 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 428 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 23 Apr 2024 05:40:15 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.008s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 479 +0.002s ... 0.011s

#8 got single benchmarks 479 +0.012s ... 0.022s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 482 +0.002s ... 0.025s

#10 got single benchmarks 482 +0.006s ... 0.03s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 428 +0.002s ... 0.032s

#12 got single benchmarks 428 +0.005s ... 0.038s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.038s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.051s ... 0.089s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.089s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)