Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1500 vs Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1600 vs Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1700

Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1500

► remove from comparison

The Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1500 is a slow clocked entry level processor for cheap laptops. It is based on the old Merom core, but compared to Core 2 Duo processors, the T1700 offers less features of the architecture. For example power saving functions and hardware virtualization is not enabled. According to Intel the CPU does not support Enhanced Speedstep, but there are some versions in laptops that support the automatic downclocking.

Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1600

► remove from comparison

The Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1600 is a slow clocked entry level processor for cheap laptops. It is based on the old Merom core, but compared to Core 2 Duo processors, the T1700 offers less features of the architecture. For example power saving functions and hardware virtualization is not enabled. According to Intel the CPU does not support Enhanced Speedstep, but there are some versions in laptops that support the automatic downclocking.

Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1700

► remove from comparison

The Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1700 is a slow clocked entry level processor for cheap laptops. It is based on the old Merom core, but compared to Core 2 Duo processors, the T1700 offers less features of the architecture. For example power saving functions and hardware virtualization is not enabled. According to Intel the CPU does not support Enhanced Speedstep, but there are some versions in laptops that support the automatic downclocking.

ModelIntel Celeron Dual-Core T1500Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1600Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1700
SeriesIntel Celeron Dual-CoreIntel Celeron Dual-CoreIntel Celeron Dual-Core
CodenameMeromMeromMerom
Series: Celeron Dual-Core Merom
Intel Celeron Dual-Core T17001.83 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron Dual-Core T16001.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1500 « 1.87 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron Dual-Core T17001.83 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1600 « 1.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron Dual-Core T15001.87 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1700 « 1.83 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron Dual-Core T16001.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron Dual-Core T15001.87 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock1866 MHz1660 MHz1830 MHz
FSB533667667
L2 Cache512 KB1 MB1 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 22 / 2
TDP35 Watt35 Watt35 Watt
65 nm, 1.075-1.175V65 nm, 1.075V-1.175V65 nm, 1.075V-1.175V
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C100 °C
FeaturesIntel 64, eXIntel 64, eXIntel 64, eX, SSE3
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Transistors291 Million291 Million
Die Size143 mm2143 mm2
SocketPPGA478PPGA478
Manufacturerprocessorfinder.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 T1500 +
1625 Points (10%)
108%
1 T1700 +
1750 Points (11%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
2960 Points (2%)
3000 Points (2%)
3270 Points (2%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
1400 Points (3%)
1350 Points (3%)
1456 Points (3%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
39 s (8%)
36 s (8%)
33.8 s (7%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 T1500 +
91 s (4%)
101%
1 T1700 +
75 s (3%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
15900 MIPS (8%)
14100 MIPS (7%)
15600 MIPS (7%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
12000 MFLOPS (9%)
10600 MFLOPS (8%)
11800 MFLOPS (9%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1500 → 100% n=5

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1600 → 95% n=5

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1700 → 102% n=5

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 28. 09:22:22

#0 checking url part for id 428 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 479 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 482 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 05:35:32 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.007s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 428 +0.003s ... 0.01s

#8 got single benchmarks 428 +0.005s ... 0.015s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 479 +0.002s ... 0.017s

#10 got single benchmarks 479 +0.01s ... 0.027s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 482 +0.002s ... 0.03s

#12 got single benchmarks 482 +0.004s ... 0.034s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.034s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.051s ... 0.085s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.085s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)