The Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 is a power efficient ULV subnotebook processor based on the Penryn 3M core. It features all functions of the Penryn core, like Virtualization (VT-x), Trusted Execution and Speedstep. Due to the low core clock, the performance is limited.
The Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 was a upper middle class dual core CPU for laptops, at the time of introduction. It is similar to the Core 2 Duo T9400 but features a slower clocked front side bus.
Due to the relatively high clock speed and 6MB Level 2 cache, the T9300 offers enough performance for most demanding games (in 2009) and applications.
The T9300 uses a Penryn (Montevina Update) core that features 2 integer units, 1 floating point unit, 1 load unit, and 1 store unit in a 14-stages long pipeline. Due to the Wide Dynamic Execution Technology, the core is able to simultaneously execute up to four instructions.
The integrated Enhanced Speedstep is able to downclock the core dynamically to save power (in idle mode).
The Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 is an entry level dual core processor for cheap laptops. It is based on the Penryn core but offers only 2 MB level 2 cache and a slow clock speed of 2 GHz. The performance should be sufficient for office and other casual tasks but high level gaming and HD video editing for example could be limited by the CPU performance.
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 → 100%n=7
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 → 200%n=7
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 → 161%n=7
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card - Average benchmark values for this graphics card * Smaller numbers mean a higher performance 1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
log 30. 03:33:34
#0 checking url part for id 425 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 377 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 454 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 25 Mar 2023 14:08:33 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.033s ... 0.034s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.034s
#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 425 +0.002s ... 0.036s
#8 got single benchmarks 425 +0.023s ... 0.058s
#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 377 +0.002s ... 0.06s
#10 got single benchmarks 377 +0.064s ... 0.124s
#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 454 +0.002s ... 0.126s
#12 got single benchmarks 454 +0.054s ... 0.18s
#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.18s
#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.088s ... 0.268s