The Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 is a power efficient ULV subnotebook processor based on the Penryn 3M core. It features all functions of the Penryn core, like Virtualization (VT-x), Trusted Execution and Speedstep. Due to the low core clock, the performance is limited.
The Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 is an entry level dual core processor for cheap laptops. It is based on the Penryn core but offers only 2 MB level 2 cache and a slow clock speed of 2 GHz. The performance should be sufficient for office and other casual tasks but high level gaming and HD video editing for example could be limited by the CPU performance.
The Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 was a upper middle class dual core CPU for laptops, at the time of introduction. It is similar to the Core 2 Duo T9400 except for the lower TDP of 25 versus 35 Watt).
Due to the relatively high clock speed and 6MB Level 2 cache, the P9500 offers enough performance for most demanding games (in 2009) and applications.
The P9500 uses a Penryn (Montevina Update) core that features 2 integer units, 1 floating point unit, 1 load unit, and 1 store unit in a 14-stages long pipeline. Due to the Wide Dynamic Execution Technology, the core is able to simultaneously execute up to four instructions.
The integrated Enhanced Speedstep is able to downclock the core dynamically to save power (in idle mode).
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 → 100%n=7
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 → 161%n=7
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 → 205%n=7
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card - Average benchmark values for this graphics card * Smaller numbers mean a higher performance 1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
log 02. 00:32:09
#0 checking url part for id 425 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 454 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 405 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 30 Mar 2023 15:08:37 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.03s ... 0.031s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.031s
#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 425 +0.002s ... 0.033s
#8 got single benchmarks 425 +0.022s ... 0.055s
#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 454 +0.002s ... 0.057s
#10 got single benchmarks 454 +0.047s ... 0.104s
#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 405 +0.002s ... 0.106s
#12 got single benchmarks 405 +0.029s ... 0.135s
#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.135s
#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.084s ... 0.22s