Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 vs Intel Core 2 Duo P7570

Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 is a power efficient ULV subnotebook processor based on the Penryn 3M core. It features all functions of the Penryn core, like Virtualization (VT-x), Trusted Execution and Speedstep. Due to the low core clock, the performance is limited.

Intel Core 2 Duo P7570

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 is a dual core processor for laptops. It features 2.26 GHz and a shared level 2 cache of 3 MB. It is an OEM CPU and similar to the Core 2 Duo P8400 (additional Trusted Execution Technology) and Core 2 Duo P7550 (lacks Virtualization VT-x).

The performance of the P7570 is on par with the fast Turion II Ultra with about 2.4 to 2.6 GHz. Modern demanding games like Supreme Commander may be limited by the CPU performance. High end gamers should choose a higher clocked Core 2 Duo (or Core i5 / i7).

The P7570 uses a Penryn (Montevina Update) core that features 2 integer units, 1 floating point unit, 1 load unit, and 1 store unit in a 14-stages long pipeline. Due to the Wide Dynamic Execution Technology, the core is able to simultaneously execute up to four instructions.

The integrated Enhanced Speedstep is able to downclock the core dynamically as low as 800 MHz to save power (in idle mode).

 

show full text
ModelIntel Core 2 Duo SU9300Intel Core 2 Duo P7570
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenamePenrynPenryn
Series: Core 2 Duo Penryn
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P75702.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo SU93001.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo P75702.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU93001.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock1200 MHz2260 MHz
FSB8001066
L2 Cache3 MB3 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP10 Watt25 Watt
Transistors410 Million410 Million
Technology45 nm1.050V-1.150V45 nm
Die Size107 mm2107 mm2
max. Temp.105 °C90 °C
SocketBGA956PGA478
FeaturesEnhanced Speedstep, VT, TXTEnhanced Speedstep, Intel 64, ExBit
Architecturex86x86
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo SU9300Intel Core 2 Duo P7570

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 1373     avg: 1392     median: 1391.5 (12%)     max: 1410 Points
2470 Points (22%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 2435     avg: 2463     median: 2463 (3%)     max: 2491 Points
4600 Points (6%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 1014     avg: 1028     median: 1028 (2%)     max: 1042 Points
2050 Points (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 P7570 +
22 s (5%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 P7570 +
52.4 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 SU9300 +
1992 s (9%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
9372 MIPS (4%)
19300 MIPS (9%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
8811 MFLOPS (7%)
16600 MFLOPS (13%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 SU9300 +
min: 2608     avg: 2827     median: 2827 (18%)     max: 3046 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 → 100% n=5

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 → 192% n=5

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 11. 07:26:45

#0 checking url part for id 425 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 567 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 06 Aug 2022 13:13:32 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.005s ... 0.005s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.008s

#6 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#43 composed specs +0s ... 0.008s

#44 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#45 getting avg benchmarks for device 425 +0s ... 0.009s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#47 got single benchmarks 425 +0.011s ... 0.02s

#48 getting avg benchmarks for device 567 +0s ... 0.02s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.021s

#50 got single benchmarks 567 +0.004s ... 0.025s

#51 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.025s

#52 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.026s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.026s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.026s

#55 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.027s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.027s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.027s

#58 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.027s

#59 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.028s

#60 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.028s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.028s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.029s

#63 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.029s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.029s

#65 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.029s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.03s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.03s

#68 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.031s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.031s

#70 return log +0.004s ... 0.035s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)