Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 vs Intel Core 2 Duo P8400

Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300

► remove

The Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 is a CULV laptop processor for small and light laptops. Due to the small clock speed, the CPU is specified with a TDP of only 10 Watt. For non demanding tasks, the performance of both cores is sufficient. Many laptops with the SU7300 feature an overclocking option to run the CPU at higher clock rates (e.g. 1.7 GHz in the Asus UL series). Compared to the Atom series, the SU7300 is signifantly faster.

Intel Core 2 Duo P8400

► remove Intel P8400

The Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 is a dual core processor for laptops. It features 2.26 GHz and a shared level 2 cache of 3 MB. Due to the smaller cache (Core 2 Duo T-Models got usually 6 MB at this clock rate), the TDP is only 25 Watt (instead of the 35 Watt of the T-models).

The performance of the P8400 is on par with the fast Turion II Ultra with about 2.4 to 2.6 GHz. Modern demanding games like Supreme Commander may be limited by the CPU performance. High end gamers should choose a higher clocked Core 2 Duo (or Core i5 / i7).

The P8400 uses a Penryn (Montevina Update) core that features 2 integer units, 1 floating point unit, 1 load unit, and 1 store unit in a 14-stages long pipeline. Due to the Wide Dynamic Execution Technology, the core is able to simultaneously execute up to four instructions.

The integrated Enhanced Speedstep is able to downclock the core dynamically as low as 800 MHz to save power (in idle mode).

The Core 2 Duo P8400 can be used in a Socket P socket with 479 pins: Socket P / Micro Flip-Chip Pin Grid Array (Micro-FCPGA) requires 479-pin surface mount Zero Insertion Force (ZIF) socket (mPGA479M socket) or Micro Flip-Chip Ball Grid Array (Micro-FCBGA) for surface mount (479-ball)

Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300Intel Core 2 Duo P8400
Intel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
PenrynPenryn
: Core 2 Duo Penryn
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P84002.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo SU73001.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo P84002.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU73001.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
1300 MHz2260 MHz
8001066
3 MB3 MB
2 / 22 / 2
10 25
410 410
45 45 1.05-1.15
107 mm2107 mm2
105 °C105 °C
BGA956Socket P
Enhanced Speedstep, VT-x, TXTSSE4.1, Virtualization Technology, Execute Disable Bit, Enhanced Speedstep, Ehnaced Halt State (C1E), 64 Bit, Trusted Execution Technology
Architecturex86x86
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300Intel Core 2 Duo P8400
128 KB
$209 U.S.

Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
100%
1 SU7300 +
84 Points (13%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
100%
1 SU7300 +
160 Points (2%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 SU7300 +
min: 72     avg: 72.2     median: 72.2 (2%)     max: 72.43 Points
01020304050607080Tooltip
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 SU7300 +
min: 38.39     avg: 38.7     median: 38.7 (14%)     max: 39 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 SU7300 +
min: 0.77     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (2%)     max: 0.79 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
0.4 Points (13%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 869     avg: 1462     median: 1496 (13%)     max: 1645
min: 2418     avg: 2527     median: 2497 (22%)     max: 2882
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 1642     avg: 2777     median: 2813 (5%)     max: 3181
min: 4507     avg: 4701     median: 4630 (8%)     max: 5314
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 SU7300 +
min: 3020     avg: 3045     median: 3045.5 (3%)     max: 3067 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 SU7300 +
min: 1501     avg: 1576     median: 1586 (12%)     max: 1629 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 SU7300 +
min: 2029     avg: 3417     median: 3615 (43%)     max: 4607.85 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 37.2     avg: 67.6     median: 61.3 (12%)     max: 118.483 s
34.2 s (7%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
885 (6%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
100%
1 SU7300 +
2537 MIPS (2%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
100%
1 SU7300 +
1445 MIPS (10%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
4.8 fps (2%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
26.5 fps (8%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
100%
1 SU7300 +
0.5 fps (1%)
010Tooltip
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
1 SU7300 +
0 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
1 SU7300 +
0.1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
1 SU7300 +
0.1 GB/s (0%)
Blender 2.79 - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
100%
1 SU7300 +
8394 Seconds (59%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
100%
1 SU7300 +
2.9 sec (62%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 1078     avg: 1167     median: 1178 (7%)     max: 1229 Points
min: 1922     avg: 2030     median: 2036 (11%)     max: 2084 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 22     avg: 34.2     median: 37.2 (8%)     max: 38 s
min: 21.746     avg: 22.1     median: 22 (5%)     max: 22.714 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 54     avg: 78     median: 85 (4%)     max: 88 s
min: 50.65     avg: 51.5     median: 51.7 (2%)     max: 52.229 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 1341     avg: 1830     median: 2059 (9%)     max: 2091 s
1212 s (5%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
min: 10480     avg: 11679     median: 11968.5 (6%)     max: 12300 MIPS
21204 MIPS (10%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
min: 8790     avg: 9118     median: 8911 (7%)     max: 9860 MFLOPS
15993 MFLOPS (12%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
min: 2440     avg: 2819     median: 2819 (18%)     max: 3198 Points
min: 3410     avg: 5117     median: 5201.5 (33%)     max: 6255 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
4.2 Points (60%)
5.2 Points (74%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 SU7300 +
4.1 Points (53%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 2303     avg: 2494     median: 2579 (3%)     max: 2600 Points
min: 3518     avg: 4111     median: 4340 (5%)     max: 4475 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 SU7300 +
11926 Points (8%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
100%
1 SU7300 +
983 Points (2%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
1536 (2%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
855 (17%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1024 (14%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
1707 (3%)
Geekbench 5.1 - 5.3 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.3 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 SU7300 +
207 (12%)
Geekbench 5.1 - 5.3 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.3 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 SU7300 +
392 (2%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 → 100% n=12

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 → 146% n=12

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2020, 2019
v1.16
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)