Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Pentium Dual Core SU4100 vs Intel Pentium Dual Core T4500

Intel Pentium Dual Core SU4100

► remove from comparison

The Intel Pentium SU4100 is an entry level dual-core processor for subnotebooks. It is based on the Penryn core, but may feature less power saving functions due to the Pentium brand. The slow clock speed qualifies the CPU only for less demanding tasks.

Intel Pentium Dual Core T4500

► remove from comparison Intel T4500

The Intel Pentium T4500 (or Intel Pentium Dual-Core T4500) is an entry level dual-core CPU for laptops. Compared to the Core 2 Duo CPUs, the T4500 has only 1 MB Level 2 cache and some power saving technology is deactivated. 

Therefore, the power consumption in idle mode should be a bit above similar clocked Core 2 Duo CPUs. Furtheremore, virtualization technology VT-x is also not available for the T4500.

Due to the slow clock rate and the small level 2 cache, the Pentium T4500 will limit the performance of demanding 3D games (e.g. Supreme Commander). For entry level applications like office, SD video cutting, image processing, Internet and casual gaming, the T4500 should be sufficient.

The Pentium T4500 is based on the Intel Penryn core and features 2 integer units, 1 floating point unit, 1 load unit, and 1 store unit in a 14-step pipeline. 

show full text
ModelIntel Pentium Dual Core SU4100Intel Pentium Dual Core T4500
SeriesIntel Pentium Dual CoreIntel Pentium Dual Core
CodenamePenrynPenryn
Series: Pentium Dual Core Penryn
Intel Pentium Dual Core T45002.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Dual Core T4400 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Dual Core T4300 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Dual Core T4200 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Dual Core SU4100 « 1.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Dual Core T4500 « 2.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Dual Core T4400 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Dual Core T4300 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Dual Core T4200 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Dual Core SU41001.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock1300 MHz2300 MHz
FSB800800
L2 Cache2 MB1 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP10 Watt35 Watt
Transistors410 Million410 Million
45 nm45 nm, 1.05-1.15V
Die Size107 mm2107 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C
SocketBGA956PGA478
FeaturesIntel64, Enhanced Speedstep, ExBitMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, Enhanced Intel SpeedStep Technology (EIST), Intel 64, XD bit, iAMT2 (Intel Active Management), TXT
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
L1 Cache128 KB

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 T4500 +
1.3 Points (2%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 1303     avg: 1432     median: 1409 (9%)     max: 1552 Points
min: 2234     avg: 2315     median: 2331 (14%)     max: 2367 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 2639     avg: 2728     median: 2670.5 (2%)     max: 2873 Points
min: 4283     avg: 4366     median: 4337 (3%)     max: 4490 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
2881 Points (2%)
min: 4458     avg: 4594     median: 4578 (3%)     max: 4747 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
1542 Points (2%)
min: 2388     avg: 2447     median: 2416 (3%)     max: 2538 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 1986     avg: 3179     median: 3754 (44%)     max: 3796 s
min: 1137     avg: 1142     median: 1137 (13%)     max: 1152 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 62     avg: 90.2     median: 90.2 (18%)     max: 118.6 s
min: 35.7     avg: 35.9     median: 35.7 (7%)     max: 36.2 s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 1110     avg: 1158     median: 1168.5 (2%)     max: 1183 Points
min: 1887     avg: 1920     median: 1898 (4%)     max: 1995 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 39     avg: 39.8     median: 39.5 (9%)     max: 41 s
min: 25     avg: 25.6     median: 25.6 (6%)     max: 26.2 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 89     avg: 93     median: 94 (4%)     max: 95 s
min: 62     avg: 62.9     median: 62.9 (3%)     max: 63.8 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 2073     avg: 2114     median: 2103.5 (9%)     max: 2175 s
1502 s (7%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
min: 11957     avg: 12003     median: 11963 (6%)     max: 12127 MIPS
21100 MIPS (10%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
min: 8467     avg: 9129     median: 9240.5 (7%)     max: 9566 MFLOPS
15460 MFLOPS (12%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
min: 3108     avg: 3274     median: 3274 (7%)     max: 3440 Points
min: 3747     avg: 3865     median: 3865 (8%)     max: 3983 Points
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
min: 3.9     avg: 4     median: 4 (51%)     max: 4 Points
5.8 Points (74%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Pentium Dual Core SU4100 → 100% n=14

Average Benchmarks Intel Pentium Dual Core T4500 → 142% n=14

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 25. 21:58:33

#0 checking url part for id 504 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 593 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 25 Apr 2024 05:38:32 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.01s ... 0.011s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.011s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 504 +0.003s ... 0.014s

#7 got single benchmarks 504 +0.044s ... 0.058s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 593 +0.003s ... 0.061s

#9 got single benchmarks 593 +0.028s ... 0.089s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.089s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.089s ... 0.179s

#12 return log +0.024s ... 0.202s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)