The Core 2 Duo SP9300 is a power efficient (25W TDP) dual core CPU for laptops. Compared to other Core 2 Duo with 2.26 GHz, the SP9300 features the full 6 MB level 2 cache of the Penryn core. Usually 3MB are enabled for 25 W CPUs at this clock range (e.g. P8400). Therefore, the performance is a bit better than similar clocked C2D CPUs.
The Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 is an entry level dual core processor for cheap laptops. It is based on the Penryn core but offers only 2 MB level 2 cache and a slow clock speed of 2 GHz. The performance should be sufficient for office and other casual tasks but high level gaming and HD video editing for example could be limited by the CPU performance.
The Core 2 Duo SL9400 is a power saving low voltage CPU for thin and light laptops. It offers a good performance for the 1.86 GHz clock rate, as it features the full 6 MB level 2 cache of the used Penryn core.
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 → 100%n=11
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 → 96%n=11
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 → 91%n=11
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card - Average benchmark values for this graphics card * Smaller numbers mean a higher performance 1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
v1.26
log 29. 02:35:26
#0 checking url part for id 421 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 454 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 422 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 05:35:32 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.029s ... 0.03s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.03s
#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 421 +0.003s ... 0.033s
#8 got single benchmarks 421 +0.015s ... 0.048s
#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 454 +0.003s ... 0.05s
#10 got single benchmarks 454 +0.059s ... 0.109s
#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 422 +0.003s ... 0.112s
#12 got single benchmarks 422 +0.015s ... 0.127s
#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.127s
#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.124s ... 0.251s