The Core 2 Duo SP9300 is a power efficient (25W TDP) dual core CPU for laptops. Compared to other Core 2 Duo with 2.26 GHz, the SP9300 features the full 6 MB level 2 cache of the Penryn core. Usually 3MB are enabled for 25 W CPUs at this clock range (e.g. P8400). Therefore, the performance is a bit better than similar clocked C2D CPUs.
The Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 is a power efficient subnotebook processor based on the Penryn 3M core. It features all functions of the Penryn core, like Virtualization (VT-x), Trusted Execution and Speedstep. Due to the low core clock, the performance is a bit limited, but should be sufficient for everyday tasks.
The Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 is an entry level dual core processor for laptops. It is based on the Penryn core but offers only 2 MB level 2 cache and a slow clock rate of 2.1 GHz. Compared to the Core 2 Duo T6500, the T6570 offers Virtualization VT-x and is therefore aimed at business notebooks.
The performance should be suited for non demanding applications like office, internet, entry level video editing or image correction. CPU intense games may be limited by the power of the T6570.
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card - Average benchmark values for this graphics card * Smaller numbers mean a higher performance 1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
v1.26
log 19. 13:30:45
#0 checking url part for id 421 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 473 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 466 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 19 Apr 2024 05:38:49 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.026s ... 0.027s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.027s
#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 421 +0.003s ... 0.03s
#8 got single benchmarks 421 +0.015s ... 0.045s
#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 473 +0.003s ... 0.048s
#10 got single benchmarks 473 +0.007s ... 0.055s
#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 466 +0.003s ... 0.058s
#12 got single benchmarks 466 +0.02s ... 0.078s
#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.078s
#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.089s ... 0.167s