Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo SP7500 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T5870

Intel Core 2 Duo SP7500

► remove from comparison

The Core 2 Duo SP7500 is a low power Core 2 Duo based on the Merom core that was used in the MacBook Air (but due to throttling could not show the full performance).

Intel Core 2 Duo T5870

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core 2 Duo T5870 is an entry level dual core processor based on the old Merom core. It features a reduced level 2 cache to 2 MB and no virtualization functions. Furthermore, the clock rate of 2 GHz is relatively slow.

ModelIntel Core 2 Duo SP7500Intel Core 2 Duo T5870
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenameMeromMerom
Series: Core 2 Duo Merom
Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7600 compare2.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 compare2.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5850 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58702 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5800 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5750 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7100 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5600 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5550 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5500 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5300 compare1.73 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo SP75001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5200 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7300 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7100 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7600 compare2.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 compare2.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5850 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T58702 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5800 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5750 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7100 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5600 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5550 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5500 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5300 compare1.73 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP75001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5200 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7300 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7100 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock1600 MHz2000 MHz
FSB800800
L2 Cache4 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP20 Watt34 Watt
65 nm65 nm, 1.075V-1.175V
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Transistors291 Million
Die Size143 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C
FeaturesIntel 64, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable Bit
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo T5870

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
1766 Points (16%)
min: 1875     avg: 2092     median: 2088.5 (19%)     max: 2316 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
2781 Points (4%)
min: 3480     avg: 3855     median: 3809.5 (5%)     max: 4319 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 T5870 +
min: 1355     avg: 1916     median: 1915.5 (23%)     max: 2476 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 T5870 +
min: 42.47     avg: 60     median: 60 (12%)     max: 77.6 s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
982 Points (2%)
min: 1560     avg: 1606     median: 1628 (3%)     max: 1630 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
36.9 s (8%)
min: 26.78     avg: 27.4     median: 27 (6%)     max: 28.27 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
79.8 s (3%)
min: 61.8     avg: 63.9     median: 63.9 (3%)     max: 66 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
2296 s (10%)
1492 s (7%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 T5870 +
16620 MIPS (8%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 T5870 +
12000 MFLOPS (9%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
2752 Points (17%)
min: 3903     avg: 3926     median: 3925.5 (25%)     max: 3948 Points
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 T5870 +
4.9 Points (63%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo SP7500 → 100% n=7

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T5870 → 124% n=7

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.18
log 05. 01:21:01

#0 checking url part for id 382 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 442 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 30 Sep 2022 13:14:19 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.004s ... 0.004s

#5 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#7 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#8 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#9 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#10 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#11 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#25 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#26 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#31 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#33 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#34 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#35 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#37 composed specs +0s ... 0.005s

#38 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#39 getting avg benchmarks for device 382 +0s ... 0.006s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#41 got single benchmarks 382 +0.007s ... 0.013s

#42 getting avg benchmarks for device 442 +0s ... 0.013s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#44 got single benchmarks 442 +0.009s ... 0.023s

#45 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.023s

#46 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.024s

#47 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.024s

#48 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.024s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.024s

#50 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.024s

#51 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.024s

#52 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.024s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.025s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.025s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.025s

#56 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.025s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.025s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.026s

#59 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.026s

#60 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.026s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.026s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.026s

#63 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.027s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.027s

#65 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.027s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.027s

#67 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.028s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.028s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.029s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.029s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.03s

#72 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.03s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.031s

#74 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.032s

#75 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.032s

#76 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.032s

#77 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.032s

#78 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.023s ... 0.055s

#79 return log +0.004s ... 0.059s

Please share our article, every link counts!
.170
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)