Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 vs Intel Core 2 Duo P8800

Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400

► remove Intel SL9400

The Core 2 Duo SL9400 is a power saving low voltage CPU for thin and light laptops. It offers a good performance for the 1.86 GHz clock rate, as it features the full 6 MB level 2 cache of the used Penryn core.

Intel Core 2 Duo P8800

► remove Intel P8800

The Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 is a dual core processor for laptops. It features 2.66 GHz and a shared level 2 cache of 3 MB. Due to the smaller cache (Core 2 Duo T-Models got usually 6 MB at this clock rate), the TDP is only 25 Watt (instead of the 35 Watt of the T-models).

Due to the relatively high clock speed, modern games (in 2009) should not be limited by the CPU speed (in conjunction with a middle class graphics card). High end gamers should choose a higher clocked Dual Core instead (when using a high end GPU).

The P8800 uses a Penryn (Montevina Update) core that features 2 integer units, 1 floating point unit, 1 load unit, and 1 store unit in a 14-stages long pipeline. Due to the Wide Dynamic Execution Technology, the core is able to simultaneously execute up to four instructions.

The integrated Enhanced Speedstep is able to downclock the core dynamically as low as 1200 MHz to save power (in idle mode).

The Core 2 Duo P8800 can be used in a Socket P socket with 479 pins: Socket P / Micro Flip-Chip Pin Grid Array (Micro-FCPGA) requires 479-pin surface mount Zero Insertion Force (ZIF) socket (mPGA479M socket) or Micro Flip-Chip Ball Grid Array (Micro-FCBGA) for surface mount (479-ball)

Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400Intel Core 2 Duo P8800
Intel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
PenrynPenryn
: Core 2 Duo Penryn
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3060 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2920 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2800 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2800 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2660 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2660 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2600 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2530 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2530 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2530 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P88002660 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2500 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2530 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2400 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2400 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2400 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2260 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2260 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2260 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2260 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2300 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2130 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2130 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2200 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2200 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2100 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2000 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2000 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2100 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2100 MHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo SL94001860 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1800 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2000 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1600 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1600 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1400 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1300 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1200 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3060 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2920 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2800 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2800 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2660 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2660 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2600 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2530 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2530 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2530 MHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo P88002660 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2500 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2530 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2400 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2400 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2400 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2260 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2260 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2260 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2260 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2300 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2130 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2130 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2200 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2200 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2100 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2000 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2000 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2100 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2100 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL94001860 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1800 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2000 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1600 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1600 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1400 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1300 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1200 MHz2 / 2
1860 MHz2660 MHz
10661066
6 MB3 MB
2 / 22 / 2
17 25
410 410
45 1.050V - 1.150V45 1.00V-1.25V
107 mm2107 mm2
105 °C105 °C
BGA956BGA479, PGA478
Enhanced Speedstep, Intel VT, TXTSSE4.1, Virtualization Technology, Execute Disable Bit, Enhanced Speedstep, Ehnaced Halt State (C1E), 64 Bit, Trusted Execution Technology
$284 U.S.$241 U.S.
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400Intel Core 2 Duo P8800
128 KB

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
1.1 Points (3%)
1.5 Points (3%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 2029     avg: 2126     median: 2144 (22%)     max: 2205
min: 2798     avg: 2890     median: 2932 (30%)     max: 2940
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 3831     avg: 3848     median: 3850 (6%)     max: 3864
min: 5240     avg: 5357     median: 5370 (9%)     max: 5460
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 1329.49     avg: 1355     median: 1354.7 (16%)     max: 1379.9 s
min: 982     avg: 993     median: 993.4 (12%)     max: 1004.7 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 41.932     avg: 43.1     median: 43.1 (9%)     max: 44.3 s
min: 30.8     avg: 31.4     median: 31.4 (6%)     max: 31.9 s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 909     avg: 1300     median: 1300 (9%)     max: 1691 Points
min: 2309     avg: 2355     median: 2355 (16%)     max: 2401 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 23     avg: 23.8     median: 23 (5%)     max: 25.4 s
min: 19     avg: 19.5     median: 19.5 (4%)     max: 19.9 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 53     avg: 56.6     median: 58 (2%)     max: 58.9 s
min: 44     avg: 45.6     median: 45.6 (2%)     max: 47.2 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 1372     avg: 1428     median: 1433 (6%)     max: 1480 s
min: 961     avg: 1048     median: 1048.4 (5%)     max: 1135.7 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
min: 17246     avg: 17255     median: 17255 (8%)     max: 17264 MIPS
min: 24450     avg: 26155     median: 26155 (12%)     max: 27860 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
min: 13673     avg: 13693     median: 13692.5 (11%)     max: 13712 MFLOPS
18000 MFLOPS (14%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
min: 3921     avg: 4158     median: 4158 (26%)     max: 4395 Points
min: 3921     avg: 4158     median: 4158 (26%)     max: 4395 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
4.8 Points (69%)
4.8 Points (69%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
5.3 Points (68%)
6.3 Points (81%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
3809 Points (5%)
4658 Points (7%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 → 100% n=15

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 → 122% n=15

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2020, 2019
v1.15
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)