Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 vs Intel Core 2 Duo P9600
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 ► remove
The Core 2 Duo SL9380 is a power saving low voltage CPU for thin and light laptops. It offers a good performance for the 1.8 GHz clock rate, as it features the full 6 MB level 2 cache of the used Penryn core. Compared to the SL9400, the SL9380 offers only an FSB with 800 MHz clock rate (instead of 1066) and exactly 1.8 GHz (SL9400 1.86).
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 ► remove
The Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 is an entry level dual core processor for laptops. It is based on the Penryn core but offers only 2 MB level 2 cache and a slow clock rate of 2.1 GHz. Compared to the Core 2 Duo T6570, the T6500 does not offer Virtualization VT-x and is therefore aimed at consumer notebooks.
The performance should be suited for non demanding applications like office, internet, entry level video editing or image correction. CPU intense games may be limited by the power of the T6500.
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 ► remove
The Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 was a upper middle class dual core CPU for laptops, at the time of introduction. It is similar to the Core 2 Duo T9550 except for the lower TDP of 25 versus 35 Watt).
Due to the relatively high clock speed and 6MB Level 2 cache, the P9600 offers enough performance for demanding games (in 2009) and applications. The newer Core i3-330M should deliver a similar performance due to the hyperthreading support.
The P9600 uses a Penryn (Montevina Update) core that features 2 integer units, 1 floating point unit, 1 load unit, and 1 store unit in a 14-stages long pipeline. Due to the Wide Dynamic Execution Technology, the core is able to simultaneously execute up to four instructions.
The integrated Enhanced Speedstep is able to downclock the core dynamically to save power (in idle mode).
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Single 32Bit
min: 2197 avg: 2282.8 median: 2249 (25%) max: 2487 Points
2971 Points (32%)
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
min: 3800 avg: 4253.8 median: 4262 (9%) max: 4757 Points
5507 Points (11%)
wPrime 2.0x - 1024m *
min: 1158.21 avg: 1171.6 median: 1171.6 (14%) max: 1184.92 seconds
wPrime 2.0x - 32m *
min: 36.5 avg: 36.9 median: 37 (7%) max: 37.237 seconds
3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 1867 avg: 1875.7 median: 1879 (13%) max: 1881 Points
2375 Points (16%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 1280x800
1887 Points (66%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - Standard 1280x768 1280x768
1768 Points (58%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 22 avg: 24.2 median: 24.5 (5%) max: 25.584 Seconds
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 54 avg: 58.3 median: 58.5 (3%) max: 62.306 Seconds
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 1339 avg: 1347.7 median: 1341 (6%) max: 1363 Seconds
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
19458 MIPS (9%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
15381 MFLOPS (12%)
PCMark 05 - Standard 1024x768
min: 4087 avg: 4922.2 median: 5278 (33%) max: 5522 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - CPU
min: 5 avg: 5.1 median: 5.1 (73%) max: 5.1 Points
3DMark Vantage - P CPU no PhysX 1280x1024
min: 3945 avg: 4014.5 median: 4014.5 (7%) max: 4084 Points
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 → 100%
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 → 129%
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance1
This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)
Top 10 Laptops
Multimedia, Budget Multimedia, Gaming, Budget Gaming, Lightweight Gaming, Business, Budget Office, Workstation, Subnotebooks, Ultrabooks, Chromebooks
under 300 USD/Euros, under 500 USD/Euros, 1.000 USD/Euros
Best Displays, for University Students
Top 10 Smartphones
Smartphones, Phablets, ≤5-inch, Camera SmartphonesNotebookcheck's Top 10 Smartphones under 160 Euros