The Core 2 Duo SL9380 is a power saving low voltage CPU for thin and light laptops. It offers a good performance for the 1.8 GHz clock rate, as it features the full 6 MB level 2 cache of the used Penryn core. Compared to the SL9400, the SL9380 offers only an FSB with 800 MHz clock rate (instead of 1066) and exactly 1.8 GHz (SL9400 1.86).
The Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 is an entry level dual core processor for cheap laptops. It is based on the Penryn core but offers only 2 MB level 2 cache and a slow clock speed of 2 GHz. The performance should be sufficient for office and other casual tasks but high level gaming and HD video editing for example could be limited by the CPU performance.
The Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 is an entry level dual core processor for laptops. It is based on the Penryn core but offers only 2 MB level 2 cache and a slow clock rate of 2.1 GHz. Compared to the Core 2 Duo T6500, the T6570 offers Virtualization VT-x and is therefore aimed at business notebooks.
The performance should be suited for non demanding applications like office, internet, entry level video editing or image correction. CPU intense games may be limited by the power of the T6570.
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 → NAN%n=
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 → NAN%n=
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card - Average benchmark values for this graphics card * Smaller numbers mean a higher performance 1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
log 07. 01:33:09
#0 checking url part for id 497 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 454 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 466 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 02 Jun 2023 13:55:08 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.029s ... 0.03s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.03s
#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 497 +0.002s ... 0.032s
#8 got single benchmarks 497 +0s ... 0.032s
#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 454 +0.002s ... 0.034s
#10 got single benchmarks 454 +0.051s ... 0.084s
#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 466 +0.002s ... 0.086s
#12 got single benchmarks 466 +0.025s ... 0.111s
#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.111s
#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.091s ... 0.203s