The Core 2 Duo SL9300 is a power saving low voltage CPU for thin and light laptops. It offers a good performance for the 1.6 GHz clock rate, as it features the full 6 MB level 2 cache of the used Penryn core.
The Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 was at the time of announcement a fast dual-core CPU for laptops with 3 MB level 2 cache. It is based on the Penryn core with all features enabled (but without the full 6MB level 2 cache). The later announced Core 2 Duo P7450 was cheaper and used less power.
The Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 was a upper middle class dual core CPU for laptops at the time of introduction. It was intended to be used in the Santa Rosa platform due to the 800 MHz FSB. The T9550 is only slightly higher clocked but offers already a FSB1066.
Due to the relatively high clock speed and 6MB Level 2 cache, the T9500 offers enough performance for demanding games (in 2009) and applications.
The T9500 uses a Penryn (Montevina Update) core that features 2 integer units, 1 floating point unit, 1 load unit, and 1 store unit in a 14-stages long pipeline. Due to the Wide Dynamic Execution Technology, the core is able to simultaneously execute up to four instructions.
The integrated Enhanced Speedstep is able to downclock the core dynamically to save power (in idle mode).
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 → NAN%n=
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 → NAN%n=
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card - Average benchmark values for this graphics card * Smaller numbers mean a higher performance 1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
log 28. 04:45:00
#0 checking url part for id 423 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 379 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 376 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 25 Jan 2023 08:57:11 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.026s ... 0.027s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.027s
#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 423 +0.002s ... 0.029s
#8 got single benchmarks 423 +0s ... 0.029s
#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 379 +0.002s ... 0.031s
#10 got single benchmarks 379 +0.043s ... 0.074s
#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 376 +0.002s ... 0.076s
#12 got single benchmarks 376 +0.02s ... 0.096s
#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.096s
#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.046s ... 0.143s