Notebookcheck Logo
, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 vs Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400

Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300

► remove from comparison

The Core 2 Duo SL9300 is a power saving low voltage CPU for thin and light laptops. It offers a good performance for the 1.6 GHz clock rate, as it features the full 6 MB level 2 cache of the used Penryn core.

Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400

► remove from comparison Intel SL9400

The Core 2 Duo SL9400 is a power saving low voltage CPU for thin and light laptops. It offers a good performance for the 1.86 GHz clock rate, as it features the full 6 MB level 2 cache of the used Penryn core.

show full text
ModelIntel Core 2 Duo SL9300Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenamePenrynPenryn
Series: Core 2 Duo Penryn
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL94001.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo SL93001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo SL94001.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL93001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock1600 MHz1860 MHz
FSB10661066
L2 Cache6 MB6 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP17 Watt17 Watt
Transistors410 Million410 Million
45 nm45 nm1.050V - 1.150V
Die Size107 mm2107 mm2
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C
SocketBGA956BGA956
FeaturesEnhanced Speedstep, Intel VT, TXTEnhanced Speedstep, Intel VT, TXT
Architecturex86x86
$284 U.S.$284 U.S.
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo SL9300Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 SL9400 +
1.1 Points (2%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 SL9400 +
min: 2029     avg: 2126     median: 2144 (19%)     max: 2205 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 SL9400 +
min: 3831     avg: 3848     median: 3850 (5%)     max: 3864 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 SL9400 +
min: 1329     avg: 1355     median: 1354.5 (16%)     max: 1380 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 SL9400 +
min: 41.93     avg: 43.1     median: 43.1 (9%)     max: 44.3 s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 SL9400 +
min: 909     avg: 1300     median: 1300 (3%)     max: 1691 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 SL9400 +
min: 23     avg: 23.8     median: 23 (5%)     max: 25.4 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 SL9400 +
min: 53     avg: 56.6     median: 58 (2%)     max: 58.9 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 SL9400 +
min: 1372     avg: 1428     median: 1433 (6%)     max: 1480 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 SL9400 +
min: 17246     avg: 17255     median: 17255 (8%)     max: 17264 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 SL9400 +
min: 13673     avg: 13693     median: 13692.5 (11%)     max: 13712 MFLOPS
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 SL9400 +
min: 3921     avg: 4158     median: 4158 (26%)     max: 4395 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 SL9400 +
4.8 Points (69%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 SL9400 +
5.3 Points (68%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 SL9400 +
3809 Points (4%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 → NAN% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 16. 16:57:02

#0 checking url part for id 423 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 422 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 13 May 2022 13:12:21 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.008s ... 0.009s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.003s ... 0.012s

#6 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#43 composed specs +0s ... 0.013s

#44 did output specs +0s ... 0.013s

#45 getting avg benchmarks for device 423 +0s ... 0.013s

#46 got single benchmarks 423 +0s ... 0.013s

#47 getting avg benchmarks for device 422 +0s ... 0.013s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#49 got single benchmarks 422 +0.004s ... 0.017s

#50 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.017s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.018s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.018s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.018s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.018s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.018s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.018s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.018s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.018s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.018s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.018s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.018s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.018s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.018s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.018s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.018s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.018s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.019s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.019s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.019s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.019s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.019s

#72 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.019s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.019s

#74 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.019s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.019s

#76 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.019s

#77 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.019s

#78 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.019s

#79 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.019s

#80 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.02s

#81 return log +0.004s ... 0.023s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)