Notebookcheck Logo
, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 vs Intel Core 2 Duo P9700

Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300

► remove from comparison

The Core 2 Duo SL9300 is a power saving low voltage CPU for thin and light laptops. It offers a good performance for the 1.6 GHz clock rate, as it features the full 6 MB level 2 cache of the used Penryn core.

Intel Core 2 Duo P9700

► remove from comparison Intel P9700

The Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 is a high end dual core CPU for laptops (at the time of introduction). It is the fastest Core 2 Duo P-model and the performance is comparable to the Core 2 Duo T9600. Still the TDP rating is considerably better (28 versus 35 Watt).

Due to the high clock speed, the P9700 offers enough performance for demanding games (in 2009) and applications. 

The P9700 uses a Penryn core that features 2 integer units, 1 floating point unit, 1 load unit, and 1 store unit in a 14-stages long pipeline. Due to the Wide Dynamic Execution Technology, the core is able to simultaneously execute up to four instructions.

The integrated Enhanced Speedstep is able to downclock the core dynamically (in idle mode).

The Core 2 Duo P9700 can be used in a Socket P socket with 479 pins.

show full text
ModelIntel Core 2 Duo SL9300Intel Core 2 Duo P9700
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenamePenrynPenryn
Series: Core 2 Duo Penryn
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P97002.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo SL93001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo P97002.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL93001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock1600 MHz2800 MHz
FSB10661066
L2 Cache6 MB6 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP17 Watt28 Watt
Transistors410 Million410 Million
45 nm45 nm1.012-1.175V
Die Size107 mm2107 mm2
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C
SocketBGA956PGA478
FeaturesEnhanced Speedstep, Intel VT, TXTVirtualization (VT-x), Trusted Execution, Intel 64, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable Bit
Architecturex86x86
$284 U.S.$348 U.S.
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo SL9300Intel Core 2 Duo P9700
L1 Cache128 KB

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 P9700 +
min: 3060     avg: 3330     median: 3425 (31%)     max: 3506 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 P9700 +
min: 5680     avg: 6143     median: 6133 (8%)     max: 6616 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 P9700 +
1737 s (21%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 P9700 +
54.6 s (11%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 P9700 +
min: 2506     avg: 2552     median: 2540 (5%)     max: 2610 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 P9700 +
16 s (3%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 P9700 +
39 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 P9700 +
1030 s (5%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 P9700 +
25753 MIPS (12%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 P9700 +
19374 MFLOPS (15%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 P9700 +
7348 Points (46%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 P9700 +
5396 Points (6%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 → NAN% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 23. 16:34:29

#0 checking url part for id 423 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 476 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 23 May 2022 13:12:29 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.006s ... 0.006s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.005s ... 0.011s

#6 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#43 composed specs +0s ... 0.012s

#44 did output specs +0s ... 0.012s

#45 getting avg benchmarks for device 423 +0s ... 0.012s

#46 got single benchmarks 423 +0s ... 0.012s

#47 getting avg benchmarks for device 476 +0s ... 0.013s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#49 got single benchmarks 476 +0.008s ... 0.021s

#50 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.021s

#51 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.021s

#52 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.021s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.022s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.022s

#55 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.022s

#56 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.022s

#57 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.022s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.023s

#59 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.023s

#60 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.023s

#61 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.023s

#62 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.023s

#63 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.024s

#64 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.024s

#65 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.024s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.024s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.025s

#68 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.025s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.025s

#70 return log +0.004s ... 0.029s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)