Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 vs Samsung Exynos 2200

Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD 8 Gen 1

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 Mobile Platform is a high-end SoC for smartphones that was introduced in late 2021 and manufactured in 4 nm at Samsung. Integrates one “Prime Core” based on a ARM Cortex-X2 architecture clocked at up to 3 GHz. Three more performance cores are based on the Cortex-A710 but clocked up to 2.5 GHz. Furthermore, four energy saving cores are integrated that are based on the ARM Cortex-A510 architecture and clocked at up to 1.8 GHz. All cores can use the shared 6 MB level 3 cache.

Compared to the Snapdragon 888 (Plus), the CPU part gains 20% performance and 30% power savings according to Qualcomm. This means that the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 is the fastest CPU for Android based smartphones and should be positioned between the Apple A13 and A14 CPU.

The integrated AI Engine can offer up to 4x faster AI performance thanks to the bigger Tensor engine. The 18-Bit-Spectra-ISP also saw some big improvements and is now called Snapdragon Sight.

The integrated Adreno 730 offers a 30% graphics boost compared to the previous Adreno 660.

The integrated Snapdragon X65 5G modem is also new and offers faster transfer rates (up to 10 Gbps download and 3 Gbps upload). The FastConnect 6900 offers support for the current Wifi 6E and Bluetooth 5.2.

Samsung Exynos 2200

► remove from comparison Samsung Exynos 2200

The Samsung Exynos 2200  is a high end SoC with 8 cores in three clusters. One fast ARM Cortex-S2 with up to 2.8 GHz for single thread performance. Three more slower ARM Cortex-A710 with up to 2.52 GHz for performance tasks and four efficient cores using the ARM Cortex-A510 architecture clocked at up to 1.82 GHz.

The SoC also integrates a 5G modem with up to 7.35 Gbps (5G NR Sub-6Hz, 5G NR mmWave, LTE Cat.24 DL / Cat.22 UL) similar to the Exynos 2100. In addition to this, an image processor for 200mP in single camera mode and 8K video, an AI engine with a dual-core NPU and DPS and various GNSS systems (GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo).

As a first, the Exynos 2200 integrates a graphics card based on the AMD RDNA 2 architecture called Samsung Xclipse 920).

The CPU performance in our benchmarks was slightly below the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (fastest Android SoC currently) and the Apple A15 in the iPhone 13.

The chip is produced in the modern 4nm process at Samsung using EUV.

ModelQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1Samsung Exynos 2200
CodenameCortex-X2 / A710 / A510 (Kryo) WaipioExynos X2 / Cortex-A710 / A510
SeriesQualcomm Snapdragon 8Samsung Exynos
Series: Snapdragon 8 Cortex-X2 / A710 / A510 (Kryo) Waipio
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 compare1.8 - 3.2 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 « 1.8 - 3 GHz8 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Clock1800 - 2995 MHz1820 - 2800 MHz
L3 Cache6 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 8
1 x 3.0 GHz ARM Cortex-X2
3 x 2.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A710
4 x 1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A510
8 / 8
Technology4 nm4 nm
FeaturesAdreno 730 GPU, Spectra ISP, Hexagon, X65 5G Modem, FastConnect 6900 WiFi, LPDDR5-6400 Memory Controller5G NR Sub-6GHz, 5G NR mmWave, LTE Cat. 24/22, LPDDR5-RAM, Dual-Core NPU, Wi-Fi 6E, Bluetooth 5.2
iGPUQualcomm Adreno 730Samsung Xclipse 920 ( - 555 MHz)
ArchitectureARM v9ARM
Announced
Manufacturersemiconductor.samsung.com

Benchmarks

min: 3909     avg: 4039     median: 3978.5 (37%)     max: 4288 Points
min: 3923     avg: 4120     median: 4085.5 (47%)     max: 4385 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
1610 Points (40%)
1601 Points (40%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
3860 Points (15%)
3938 Points (15%)
min: 1133     avg: 1148     median: 1149.5 (45%)     max: 1161 Points
min: 3474     avg: 3600     median: 3579.5 (6%)     max: 3768 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 6273     avg: 6608     median: 6668 (67%)     max: 6984 Points
min: 5788     avg: 5830     median: 5829.5 (58%)     max: 5871 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 14289     avg: 15053     median: 15021 (15%)     max: 15948 Points
min: 15209     avg: 15260     median: 15259.5 (15%)     max: 15310 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
5038 Points (56%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
13465 Points (19%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
7296 Points (11%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
3017 Points (45%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
4412 Points (36%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
8709 Points (79%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
12775 Points (25%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
5715 Points (12%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
8654 Points (23%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 813.5     avg: 1010     median: 897.3 (1%)     max: 1440.1 ms
min: 840.3     avg: 1306     median: 1408.5 (2%)     max: 1566 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
302.5 ms (3%)
281.5 ms (3%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 27730     avg: 42391     median: 45945 (35%)     max: 50626 Points
min: 34055     avg: 42162     median: 41695 (32%)     max: 51202 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 68     avg: 93     median: 92.5 (25%)     max: 119 Points
130 Points (36%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 79     avg: 142.9     median: 151 (27%)     max: 193 Points
min: 124     avg: 142     median: 149 (27%)     max: 153 Points
min: 704479     avg: 797881     median: 818322 (40%)     max: 850401 Points
min: 145904     avg: 195898     median: 208772 (52%)     max: 220142 Points
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 Total Score
1124910 Points (37%)
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 CPU
327492 Points (10%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random write internal
min: 36.15     avg: 47.6     median: 43.5 (30%)     max: 69.62 MB/s
70.5 MB/s (48%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq write internal
min: 831     avg: 1096     median: 1169.1 (33%)     max: 1193.1 MB/s
685 MB/s (19%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random read internal
min: 29.04     avg: 32.6     median: 30.1 (15%)     max: 42.71 MB/s
41.6 MB/s (20%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq read internal
min: 1283     avg: 1482     median: 1526.6 (42%)     max: 1662.25 MB/s
1300 MB/s (36%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
min: 19708     avg: 30794     median: 30302 (13%)     max: 44918 Points
min: 31101     avg: 33630     median: 33934.5 (15%)     max: 35551 Points
min: 12579     avg: 13805     median: 13820.5 (51%)     max: 14998 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
min: 11351     avg: 11629     median: 11628.5 (76%)     max: 11906 Points
min: 12233     avg: 12402     median: 12402 (81%)     max: 12571 Points
min: 888     avg: 979     median: 949.5 (36%)     max: 1129 Points
min: 6.24     avg: 6.7     median: 6.8 (3%)     max: 7.01 Watt
min: 0.625     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (1%)     max: 0.913 Watt

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 → 100% n=23

Average Benchmarks Samsung Exynos 2200 → 101% n=23

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 24. 15:57:28

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14029 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 14146 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1750773448s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 22 Jun 2025 05:19:33 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.005s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 14029 +0.001s ... 0.005s

#8 got single benchmarks 14029 +0.015s ... 0.02s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 14146 +0.001s ... 0.021s

#10 got single benchmarks 14146 +0.005s ... 0.026s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.026s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.021s ... 0.047s

#13 return log +0s ... 0.047s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)