Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G

Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD 778G+ 5G

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G (SDM778G Plus 5G Mobile Platform) is a fast mid-range ARM-based SoC largely found on Android tablets and smartphones. It integrates eight cores (octa-core) divided into two clusters. A fast performance cluster with four cores based on the ARM Cortex-A78 architecture with up to 2.5 GHz and a power efficiency cluster with four small ARM Cortex-A55 cores at up to 1.9 GHz. Depending on the workload only single clusters or all cores can run at different clock speeds. Compared to the older non-plus variant, the 778G+ offers 100 MHz higher clocked CPU cores.

Thanks to the new Cortex-A78 cores, the CPU performance increases by up to 40% compared to the old Snapdragon 768G according to Qualcomm. In our benchmarks, the 778G+ is able to reach the performance of the old high end chip Kirin 990

The integrated X53 5G modem supports up to 3.3 Gbps with sub 6Ghz. The FastConnect 6900 Wi-Fi modem supports the current Wi-Fi 6e standard with 6GHz.

The integrated Qualcomm Adreno 642L offers a 40% higher performance compared to the old Adreno 620 in the predecessor. This is partly thanks to the fast memory controller with LPDDR5-3200 support.

The integrated 6th gen AI engine called Hexagon 770 offers a 2x improvement and up to 12 TOPS of performance. The Spectra 570 ISP (image signal processor) supports up to three cameras. The satellite system supports all major standards like Beidou, Galileo, GLONASS and GPS.

The G specifies an optimized SoC for gaming and e.g. Qualcomm offers updates for the graphics driver.

The Snapdragon 778G Plus is manufactured in the modern 6 nm process at TSMC (vs the 5LPE of the 780G).

Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD 780G 5G

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G (SM7350-AB Mobile Platform) is a fast mid-range ARM-based SoC largely found on Android tablets and smartphones. It integrates eight cores (octa-core) divided into three clusters. A fast prime core for single thread performance based on the ARM Cortex-A78 architecture with up to 2.4 GHz. Three additional A78 based performance cores with up to 2.2 GHz and a power efficiency cluster with four small ARM Cortex-A55 cores at up to 1.9 GHz. Depending on the workload only single clusters or all cores can run at different clock speeds.

Thanks to the new Cortex-A78 cores, the CPU performance increases by up to 40% compared to the old Snapdragon 768G according to Qualcomm. In our benchmarks, the 780G is able to reach the performance of the old high end chip Kirin 990. The multi-thread performance is similar to the old Snapdragon 865+ in the Galaxy Z Fold2, but using a single core, the 780G is trailing behind.

The integrated X53 5G modem supports up to 3.3 Gbps with sub 6Ghz. The FastConnect 6900 Wi-Fi modem supports the current Wi-Fi 6e standard with 6GHz.

The integrated Qualcomm Adreno 642 offers a 50% higher performance compared to the old Adreno 620 in the predecessor. This is partly thanks to the fast memory controller with LPDDR4X-4200 support.

The integrated 6th gen AI engine called Hexagon 770 offers a 2x improvement and up to 12 TOPS of performance. The Spectra 570 ISP (image signal processor) supports up to three cameras. The satellite system supports all major standards like Beidou, Galileo, GLONASS and GPS.

The G specifies an optimized SoC for gaming and e.g. Qualcomm offers updates for the graphics driver.

The Snapdragon 780G is manufactured in the modern 5 nm process at Samsung (5LPE with EUV).

ModelQualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G
SeriesQualcomm SnapdragonQualcomm Snapdragon
CodenameKryo 670 (Cortex-A78/A55)Kryo 670 (Cortex-A78/A55)
Series: Snapdragon Kryo 670 (Cortex-A78/A55)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G1.9 - 2.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 670 (Cortex-A78/A55)
Qualcomm QCM6490 compare1.96 - 2.71 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 670 (Cortex-A78/A55)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G « 1.9 - 2.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 670 (Cortex-A78/A55)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G compare1.8 - 2.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 670 (Cortex-A78/A55)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 4G compare1.8 - 2.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 670 (Cortex-A78/A55)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G « 1.9 - 2.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 670 (Cortex-A78/A55)
Qualcomm QCM6490 compare1.96 - 2.71 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 670 (Cortex-A78/A55)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G1.9 - 2.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 670 (Cortex-A78/A55)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G compare1.8 - 2.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 670 (Cortex-A78/A55)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 4G compare1.8 - 2.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 670 (Cortex-A78/A55)
Clock1900 - 2500 MHz1900 - 2400 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 8
Technology6 nm5 nm
FeaturesAdreno 642L GPU, X53 5G Modem, Hexagon 770 DSP, Spectra 570L ISP, Wi-Fi 6EAdreno 642 GPU, X53 5G Modem, Hexagon 770 DSP, Specra 570 ISP, FasctConnect 6900 Wi-Fi 6E
iGPUQualcomm Adreno 642LQualcomm Adreno 642
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.qualcomm.comwww.qualcomm.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - SD 780G 5G
min: 1.074     avg: 1.1     median: 1.1 (83%)     max: 1.3 pt
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 4518     avg: 4659     median: 4547 (18%)     max: 4912 Points
2354 Points (9%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
4732 Points (54%)
2567 Points (29%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 813     avg: 821     median: 824 (35%)     max: 826 Points
809 Points (34%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 2872     avg: 2933     median: 2929 (5%)     max: 2998 Points
2998 Points (5%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 3758     avg: 3760     median: 3760 (38%)     max: 3762 Points
3674 Points (37%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11089     avg: 11342     median: 11342 (12%)     max: 11595 Points
11965 Points (13%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 3632     avg: 3641     median: 3640.5 (50%)     max: 3649 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 10488     avg: 10675     median: 10674.5 (26%)     max: 10861 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 10323     avg: 11834     median: 11833.5 (19%)     max: 13344 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2966     avg: 3441     median: 3440.5 (52%)     max: 3915 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
2679 Points (22%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
3563 Points (32%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
17573 Points (34%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
7678 Points (15%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
9815 Points (26%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1236.1     avg: 1456     median: 1335 (2%)     max: 1796.1 ms
1802 ms (2%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 24488     avg: 29797     median: 32109 (29%)     max: 32794 Points
26943 Points (24%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 69     avg: 85     median: 93 (27%)     max: 93 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 102     avg: 115     median: 116 (24%)     max: 127 Points
106 Points (22%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
75496 Points (63%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
78048 Points (63%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
158362 Points (29%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
156362 Points (57%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
468196 Points (45%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
min: 553328     avg: 564791     median: 558781 (34%)     max: 582264 Points
521880 Points (32%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
min: 138027     avg: 154764     median: 162368 (44%)     max: 163897 Points
161037 Points (44%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
min: 6225     avg: 6514     median: 6514 (1%)     max: 6803 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
min: 30076     avg: 30829     median: 30828.5 (49%)     max: 31581 Points
20384 Points (32%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
min: 11662     avg: 13225     median: 12820 (59%)     max: 15194 Points
11218 Points (52%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
6971 Points (37%)
6393 Points (34%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
11690 Points (76%)
10689 Points (70%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
0 Points (0%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
9712 Points (49%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 730     avg: 741     median: 732 (28%)     max: 760 Points
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 4.05     avg: 4.6     median: 4.4 (2%)     max: 5.36 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 0     avg: 0.9     median: 1.1 (1%)     max: 1.58 Watt

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G → 100% n=15

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G → 88% n=15

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 18. 17:53:50

#0 checking url part for id 14526 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13201 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 17 May 2024 11:21:47 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.024s ... 0.025s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.025s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 14526 +0.003s ... 0.028s

#7 got single benchmarks 14526 +0.012s ... 0.04s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 13201 +0.015s ... 0.055s

#9 got single benchmarks 13201 +0.007s ... 0.062s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.062s

#11 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.112s ... 0.174s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.009s ... 0.183s

#13 return log +0.024s ... 0.207s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)