, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 vs Samsung Exynos 7904

Qualcomm Snapdragon 675

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD 675

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 (SD675) is a fast mid-range ARM-based SoC largely found on Android tablets and smartphones. It features 8 Kryo 460 called cores (64-Bit capable) that are divided in two clusters. A fast cluster of two cores with up to 2 GHz and  based on the ARM Cortex-A76 design. And a power saving efficiency cluster with up to 1.6 GHz and based on much smaller ARM Cortex-A55 cores. Both clusters can also used together.

In addition to the 8 CPU cores, the SoC integrates a lower mid range Adreno 612 GPU, a X12 LTE Modem with up to 600 Mbps download (Cat 12) and 150 Mbps upload (Cat 13), a 802.11ac (Wifi 5) Wave 2 WLAN modem (up to 867 Mbps), a Bluetooth 5.0 radio, satellite positioning (GPS, QZSS, GLONASS, SBAS, Beidou and Galileo) and a video engine (up to 4k30 encoding and support for H.265, H.264, VP8 and VP9).

Performance

Thanks to the two fast Cortex-A76 based cores, the SD675 is able to even best the old high end Snapdragon 835 SoC in some benchmarks. The less powerful Snapdragon 670 e.g. only achieves 70 to 77% of the performance in Geekbench 4.3 (single - multi core test). Current high-end SoCs like the Snapdragon 855 however can still add 50-70% on top of the performance of the 675.

The Snapdragon 675 is produced in the new 11nm LPP (Low Power Plus) process at Samsung which is a combination of 14nm and 10nm. Compared to 14nm LPP, the 11nm LPP process should be able to increase performance by 15% and decrease the chip size by 10% according to Samsung.

Samsung Exynos 7904

► remove from comparison Samsung Exynos 7904

The Samsung Exynos 7904 (also called Exynos 7 Series) is a upper mid-range system-on-a-chip (SoC) for smartphones and tablets. It was launched early 2019 and features two Cortex-A73 cores clocked at up to 1.8 GHz. Furthermore, there are six power efficient Cortex-A53 cores at up to 1.6 GHz, an ARM Mali-G71 MP2 GPU and a LPDDR4x memory controller. The integrated LTE modem supports LTE Cat.12 3CA 600 Mbps download speeds and Cat.13 2CA 150 Mbps upload. 802.11ac WiFi, Bluetooth 5.0 and FM Radio are also in the chip. Compared to the older and faster Exynos 7885, the 7904 offers a slower clocked A73 cores (1.8 versus 2.2 GHz).

It is manufactured in 14nm FinFET at Samsung and therefore a rather power efficient SoC.

Qualcomm Snapdragon 675Samsung Exynos 7904
Qualcomm SnapdragonSamsung Exynos
Kryo 460 Gold (Cortex-A76) / Silver (Cortex-A55)Cortex-A73/-A53
Series: Exynos Cortex-A73/-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 compare1.7 - 2.2 GHz8 / 8 Kryo 460 Gold (Cortex-A76) / Silver (Cortex-A55)
» Qualcomm Snapdragon 6751.6 - 2 GHz8 / 8 Kryo 460 Gold (Cortex-A76) / Silver (Cortex-A55)
Samsung Exynos 7885 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A73/-A53
» Samsung Exynos 79041.8 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A73/-A53
Samsung Exynos 7884B compare1.56 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A73/-A53
1600 - 2000 MHz1800 MHz
8 / 88 / 8
11 14
Adreno 612 GPU, X12 LTE Modem, Hexagon 685 DSP, Spectra 250L ISPARM Mali-G71 MP2, 2x Cortex-A73 (2.2 GHz) + 6x Cortex-A53 (1.6 GHz, big.LITTLE), 2x 32 Bit LPDDR4 Memory Controller
iGPUQualcomm Adreno 612ARM Mali-G71 MP2
ArchitectureARMARM
Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 675

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.1, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Exynos 7904
19.2 pt (31%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
12500 Points (13%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 15461     avg: 17199     median: 16912 (17%)     max: 19511 Points
min: 12321     avg: 12706     median: 12747 (13%)     max: 13009 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 1684     avg: 2448     median: 2548.5 (32%)     max: 3011 Points
min: 1657     avg: 1708     median: 1710 (21%)     max: 1755 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 1657     avg: 2433     median: 2546 (37%)     max: 2984 Points
min: 1677     avg: 1712     median: 1713 (25%)     max: 1745 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
2251 Points (18%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
2956 Points (27%)
1860 Points (17%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
11428 Points (22%)
7368 Points (14%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
5292 Points (11%)
3613 Points (7%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
6668 Points (17%)
4275 Points (11%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
5667 (9%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
1893 (39%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
2376 (37%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
6554 (16%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2266     avg: 2323     median: 2323 (29%)     max: 2380
min: 1268     avg: 1306     median: 1320 (17%)     max: 1329
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5998     avg: 6222     median: 6222 (10%)     max: 6446
min: 4017     avg: 4073     median: 4096 (6%)     max: 4105
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 492     avg: 501     median: 504 (27%)     max: 506
273 (15%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 939     avg: 1389     median: 1610 (10%)     max: 1618
1010 (6%)
Geekbench 5.3 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
486 (26%)
Geekbench 5.3 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
924 (5%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 2806.8     avg: 2848     median: 2848.4 (5%)     max: 2889.9 ms
min: 3703     avg: 4610     median: 4515.3 (8%)     max: 5707.4 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 15689     avg: 15703     median: 15702.5 (23%)     max: 15716 Points
min: 7798     avg: 8407     median: 8372 (12%)     max: 9087 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 70     avg: 76     median: 76 (26%)     max: 82 Points
min: 43     avg: 50.8     median: 52 (18%)     max: 56 Points
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
130196 Points (44%)
min: 71303     avg: 73318     median: 73318 (25%)     max: 75333 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEM
min: 9191     avg: 10080     median: 10079.5 (31%)     max: 10968 Points
min: 2712     avg: 5838     median: 6029.5 (19%)     max: 8580 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UX
min: 42419     avg: 43904     median: 43904 (54%)     max: 45389 Points
min: 27074     avg: 30317     median: 31150.5 (38%)     max: 31891 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPU
min: 33571     avg: 33624     median: 33623.5 (10%)     max: 33676 Points
min: 21269     avg: 22734     median: 23138.5 (7%)     max: 23389 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPU
min: 75583     avg: 77634     median: 77634 (48%)     max: 79685 Points
min: 45380     avg: 46822     median: 46737 (29%)     max: 48432 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score
min: 159646     avg: 163741     median: 163741 (29%)     max: 167836 Points
min: 101367     avg: 105710     median: 105782 (19%)     max: 109906 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
23506 Points (20%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
27124 Points (22%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
6105 Points (1%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
49105 Points (18%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
105840 Points (10%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile CPU Tests
190355 Points (25%)
min: 131628     avg: 133094     median: 133094 (18%)     max: 134560 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
min: 3707     avg: 3748     median: 3748 (20%)     max: 3789 Points
min: 2527     avg: 2548     median: 2547.5 (13%)     max: 2568 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
min: 6738     avg: 8585     median: 8585 (23%)     max: 10432 Points
min: 4371     avg: 5078     median: 5077.5 (14%)     max: 5784 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
min: 7315     avg: 7660     median: 7688 (50%)     max: 7950 Points
min: 5269     avg: 5372     median: 5372.5 (35%)     max: 5474 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
min: 9288     avg: 9371     median: 9304 (47%)     max: 9522 Points
min: 5802     avg: 6452     median: 6542 (33%)     max: 6923 Points

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 → 100% n=32

Average Benchmarks Samsung Exynos 7904 → 63% n=32

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.16
log 25. 19:13:36

#0 checking url part for id 11403 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11376 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 22 Jul 2021 13:08:31 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.011s ... 0.011s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.011s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 11403 +0s ... 0.011s

#7 got single benchmarks 11403 +0.011s ... 0.022s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 11376 +0.003s ... 0.025s

#9 got single benchmarks 11376 +0.009s ... 0.034s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.034s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.02s ... 0.054s

#12 return log +0.004s ... 0.058s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)