Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865

Qualcomm Snapdragon 662

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD 662

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 is a lower mid-range ARM-based SoC largely found in Android tablets and smartphones. It features 8 Kryo 260 cores (custom design, 64-Bit capable) that are divided in two clusters. A fast cluster of four cores with up to 2 GHz (Kryo 260 Gold - Cortex-A73 derivate) and a power saving efficiency cluster with up to 1.8 GHz (Kryo 260 Silver - Cortex A53 derivate). Both clusters can also be used together.

In addition to the 8 CPU cores, the SoC integrates a mid range Adreno 610 GPU with a LPDDR4 memory controller (dual-channel)  and supports Wi-Fi (802.11ac + MIMO, max. 867 Mbps), Bluetooth 5, and LTE (X12 LTE modem with up to 600 Mbps download and 150 Mbps upload).

Power Consumption

Thanks to the new 11 nm LPP process, the energy efficiency should be quite good.

Qualcomm Snapdragon 865

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD 865

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Mobile Platform is a high-end smartphone and tablet SoC that Qualcomm announced in December 2019. The SoC integrates a fast ‘Prime Core’ that clocks up to 2.84 GHz and three further fast ARM Cortex-A77 performance cores, which can reach up to 2.42 GHz. These are complemented by four power-saving ARM Cortex-A55 cores that clock up to a maximum of 1.8 GHz. The difference to the older Snapdragon 855 is the switch from Cortex-A76 to the faster Cortex-A77 architecture. The clock speeds stay the same. 

Therefore, the Snapdragon 865 takes the top spot in mobile processors for Android based systems. In some multi-core workloads, the SD865 can even perform on par with the Apple A13 SoC. Single thread, however is still a strong suit of the Apple SoCs.

Compared to the previous generations, the Snapdragon 865 does not integrate an LTE modem anymore, but has to be paired with the new X55 5G modem, that also supports LTE Cat 24/22. The Wi-Fi module however is still integrated and called FastConnect 6800 with support for Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) and 8x8 MU-MIMU and 60 GHz 802.11ay with up to 10 Gbps. Bluetooth 5.1 is also supported including aptX Adaptive.

The integrated GPU is now called Adreno 650 and should offer 20% more performance than the Adreno 640 in the Snapdragon 855.

The on board Hexagon 698 DSP now offers an improved KI performance of up to 15 TOPS (up from 7 TOPS in the 855) and still uses a combination of CPU, GPU, HVX and Tensor cores. The Spectra 480 ISP is now also significantly faster. The integrated Computer Vision Engine (CV-ISP) now supports Dolby Vision, 8K videos and 200 megapixel photos.

The built-in memory controller now supports LPDDR5 with up to 2,750 MHz and LPDDR4X with 2,133 MHz.

The Snapdragon 865 is manufactured at TSMC in the new improved 7nm process (N7P, DUV-based). The process offers a 7% higher performance or 10% less power consumption compared to the old N7 process.

ModelQualcomm Snapdragon 662Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
CodenameKryo 260Cortex-A77 / A55 (Kryo 585)
SeriesQualcomm SnapdragonQualcomm Snapdragon
Series: Snapdragon Cortex-A77 / A55 (Kryo 585)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 « 1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 compare1.8 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s 4G Gen 1 compare1.8 - 2.1 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 « 2.42 - 2.84 GHz8 / 8 cores4 MB L3 Cortex-A77 / A55 (Kryo 585)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) compare2.42 - 3.1 GHz8 / 8 cores4 MB L3 Cortex-A77 / A55 (Kryo 585)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G compare2.42 - 3.2 GHz8 / 8 cores7 MB L3 Cortex-A77 / A55 (Kryo 585)
Clock1800 - 2000 MHz2420 - 2840 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 8
Technology11 nm7 nm
FeaturesAdreno 610 GPU, X11 LTE Modem, Hexagon 683 DSP, Specra 340T ISPAdreno 650 GPU, Spectra 480 ISP, LPDDR5 2750 MHz / LPDDR4X 2133 MHz Memory Controller
iGPUQualcomm Adreno 610Qualcomm Adreno 650 (250 - 587 MHz)
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.qualcomm.com
L1 Cache1 MB
L2 Cache1.8 MB
L3 Cache4 MB
TDP5 Watt

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - SD 662
0.5 pt (36%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - SD 865
min: 1.186     avg: 1.2     median: 1.2 (91%)     max: 1.3 pt
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 18647     avg: 19225     median: 19223.5 (15%)     max: 19804 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 1588     avg: 2240     median: 2272 (21%)     max: 2534 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 2146     avg: 2330     median: 2384 (27%)     max: 2502 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
min: 330     avg: 331.5     median: 331.5 (8%)     max: 333 Points
1212 Points (28%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
min: 1111     avg: 1129     median: 1129 (4%)     max: 1147 Points
3456 Points (12%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 SD 865 +
932 Points (4%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 SD 865 +
3450 Points (11%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1472 Points (15%)
min: 4261     avg: 4281     median: 4278 (43%)     max: 4304 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
4938 Points (5%)
min: 13186     avg: 13396     median: 13356 (13%)     max: 13589 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
0 Points (0%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
100%
1 SD 865 +
min: 3576     avg: 3816     median: 3918 (21%)     max: 3954 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
100%
1 SD 865 +
min: 4592     avg: 4779     median: 4742 (33%)     max: 5003 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
100%
1 SD 865 +
min: 17346     avg: 18106     median: 18163 (36%)     max: 18810 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
100%
1 SD 865 +
min: 8818     avg: 9056     median: 9174 (18%)     max: 9175 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
100%
1 SD 865 +
min: 10610     avg: 10878     median: 10921 (29%)     max: 11104 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 3779     avg: 4379     median: 4502 (5%)     max: 4650 ms
min: 0     avg: 2031     median: 2032.5 (2%)     max: 2911 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 SD 865 +
312.5 ms (3%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 8893     avg: 9495     median: 9485.5 (6%)     max: 10247 Points
min: 14606     avg: 22518     median: 23734 (15%)     max: 31224 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 51     avg: 53.2     median: 52 (9%)     max: 59 Points
min: 97     avg: 106.7     median: 104 (17%)     max: 127 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
min: 26857     avg: 35819     median: 37388 (31%)     max: 38718 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
min: 32579     avg: 37486     median: 34946 (28%)     max: 46499 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
min: 25724     avg: 33052     median: 33402 (6%)     max: 43315 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
min: 68508     avg: 70945     median: 71065 (26%)     max: 72576 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
min: 167471     avg: 177411     median: 177145 (17%)     max: 185542 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
min: 194505     avg: 200601     median: 198172 (10%)     max: 211557 Points
min: 628715     avg: 671674     median: 671674 (33%)     max: 714632 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
min: 64163     avg: 66339     median: 66230 (16%)     max: 68731 Points
min: 171838     avg: 178785     median: 178785 (45%)     max: 185732 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
100%
1 SD 662 +
16222 Points (2%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random write internal
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 21.7     avg: 22.3     median: 22.3 (14%)     max: 22.9 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq write internal
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 111.1     avg: 112.4     median: 112.5 (3%)     max: 113.8 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random read internal
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 15.3     avg: 15.5     median: 15.5 (7%)     max: 15.6 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq read internal
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 403     avg: 414.5     median: 414.5 (10%)     max: 426 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 10366     avg: 11330     median: 10740 (5%)     max: 12884 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
min: 3195     avg: 5608     median: 5689.5 (20%)     max: 7554 Points
11610 Points (41%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
min: 3090     avg: 3167     median: 3201 (17%)     max: 3211 Points
min: 6478     avg: 8077     median: 6893 (36%)     max: 11637 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
min: 8075     avg: 8811     median: 8076 (17%)     max: 10283 Points
min: 21645     avg: 24717     median: 24097 (51%)     max: 28841 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
min: 5866     avg: 6258     median: 6139 (40%)     max: 7184 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
min: 7247     avg: 7986     median: 8000.5 (40%)     max: 8714 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
100%
1 SD 662 +
328 Points (11%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 3.34     avg: 3.6     median: 3.6 (2%)     max: 3.83 Watt
81%
1 SD 865 +
4.4 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
100%
1 SD 662 +
min: 1.32     avg: 1.6     median: 1.6 (1%)     max: 1.953 Watt
70%
1 SD 865 +
2.3 Watt (2%)
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Average Benchmarks

Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 → 100% n=24

Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 → 271% n=24

Average of the median scores above. 1 ... This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Amazon Logo
  • $188.86
    Samsung 2020 Galaxy Tab A7 10.4’’ (2000x1200) TFT Display Wi-Fi Tablet Bundle, Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, 3GB RAM, Bluetooth, Dolby Atmos Audio, Android 10 OS w/Tigology Accessories (64GB, Gold)
  • $319.99
    XTRONS Qualcomm 662 Android Car Stereo for BMW 3 Series E90-E93 / 5 Series E60 E61 M5 (2005-2008) CCC System, 8.8 Inch IPS Touch Screen 8+128GB GPS Navigation Support Wireless CarPlay Android Auto
  • $159.99
    MANGMI AIR X Handheld Game Console, FHD 5.5'' IPS Screen, Android 14 System 4GB+64GB, Retro Handheld Game Console, Snapdragon 662 Processor, 5000mAh Battery Lasting 8 Hours, Multiple Modes(Black)
  • $259.00
    Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 10.4'' (2000x1200) with Wi-Fi, Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Bluetooth, 3GB RAM, 64GB Storage, Gray
  • $159.99
    MANGMI AIR X Handheld Game Console, FHD 5.5'' IPS Screen, Android 14 System 4GB+64GB, Retro Handheld Game Console, Snapdragon 662 Processor, 5000mAh Battery Lasting 8 Hours, Multiple Modes(Retro)

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.35
log 15. 18:56:42

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12771 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11551 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1773597401s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 13 Mar 2026 15:10:45 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.003s ... 0.004s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 12771 +0.001s ... 0.005s

#8 got single benchmarks 12771 +0.001s ... 0.006s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 11551 +0.002s ... 0.009s

#10 got single benchmarks 11551 +0.017s ... 0.025s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.025s

#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.008s ... 0.033s

#13 min, max, avg, median took s +0.015s ... 0.049s

#14 return log +0.567s ... 0.615s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
Google Logo Add as a preferred
source on Google
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)