Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro

Qualcomm Snapdragon 660

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD 660

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (SD660) is a fast mid-range ARM-based SoC largely found on Android tablets and smartphones. Announced in mid 2017, the SD660 is the successor to the Snapdragon 625. It features 8 Kryo 260 cores (custom design, 64-Bit capable) that are divided in two clusters. A fast cluster of four cores with up to 2.2 GHz and a power saving efficiency cluster with up to 1.8 GHz. Both clusters can also used together.

In addition to the 8 CPU cores, the SoC integrates a mid range Adreno 512 GPU with a LPDDR4 memory controller (dual-channel 1866 MHz)  and supports Wi-Fi (802.11ac + MIMO, max. 867 Mbps), Bluetooth 5, and LTE (X12 LTE modem with up to 600 Mbps download and 150 Mbps upload).

Performance

In Benchmarks of the Oppo R11, the CPU part of the Snapdragon SD660 performs between former high end Socs like the Snapdragon 821 in the Pixel XL and the Snapdragon 835. The graphics performance is however much lower, as the Adreno 512 is only a slight upgrade of the older Adreno 510 (due to the higher clock speed).

CPU

The Snapdragon 660 is based on a similar concept as ARM's big.LITTLE, which combines a low power CPU cluster (2x Kyro clocked at up to 1.8 GHz) and a performance CPU cluster (2x Kyro clocked at up to 2.2 GHz). The clock speed of each cluster can be individually adjusted (but not per core) and the lowest clock speed is 310 MHz (unverified).

Power Consumption

Thanks to the new 14 nm process, the energy efficiency has been improved noticeably compared to its 20 nm predecessors.

Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD 821

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 is a high-end ARM-based SoC largely found on Android tablets and smartphones. Announced in mid 2016, the S820 is the successor to the Snapdragon 820 and from a technical perspective a higher clocked version of the SoC. In addition to 4 CPU cores (two slower clocked and two faster clocked Kryo cores), the SoC integrates an Adreno 530 GPU with a LPDDR4 memory controller  and supports Wi-Fi (802.11ad + MIMO), Bluetooth 4.1, and LTE.

CPU

The Snapdragon 821 is based on a similar concept as ARM's big.LITTLE, which combines a low power CPU cluster (2x Kyro clocked at up to 1.6 GHz?) and a performance CPU cluster (2x Kyro clocked at up to 2.4 GHz). The clock speed of each cluster can be individually adjusted (but not per core) and the lowest clock speed is 310 MHz. The performance cluster features 1 MB L2 cache and the power saving one 512 KB. Both should be using the same architecture and fully support the ARMv8-ISA instruction set.

Although only four cores are used, the performance of the 821 is located in the high end of mobile CPUs for smartphones and tablets. The performance advantage of the 821 compared to the 820 depends on the used clock speed. E.g. in the Google Pixel, the SoC is only clocked at 2.15 GHz and therefore identical to many 820 SoCs.

GPU

The Adreno 530 outperforms the previous Adreno 430 especially in high demanding benchmarks. Therefore it is well suited of modern 3D games on Android devices and should rank slightly below the Tegra X1 GPU. Compared to the 530 in the 820, the 821 version should be up to 5 % faster, which speaks for a slightly higher clock speed.

Features

The Snapdragon 821 offers numerous wireless technologies such as Bluetooth 4.1, WLAN 802.11a/b/g/n/ac/ad (60 GHz) + MIMO as well as a dual-SIM cellular modem supporting LTE cat. 12/13 .

The SoC can encode and decode 4K videos using dedicated hardware (H.264 and H.265).

Power Consumption

Thanks to the new 14 nm process, the energy efficiency has been improved noticeably compared to its 20 nm predecessors.

ModelQualcomm Snapdragon 660Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro
SeriesQualcomm SnapdragonQualcomm Snapdragon
CodenameKryo 260Kryo
Series: Snapdragon Kryo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 compare1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 « 2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 compare1.8 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro « 2.4 GHz4 / 4 cores Kryo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 compare2.2 GHz4 / 4 cores Kryo
Clock2200 MHz2400 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 84 / 4
Technology14 nm14 nm
FeaturesAdreno 512 GPU, X12 LTE Modem, Hexagon 680 DSP, Specra ISPAdreno 530, LTE Hexagon 680 DSP, UMTS, GSM, WCDMA, Dual-SIM, eMMC 5.0, UHS-I, 802.11a/b/g/n/ac (2.4/5 GHz) + MIMO, Bluetooth 4.1, USB 3.0, Dual-Channel LPDDR4 Memory Controller
iGPUQualcomm Adreno 512 ( - 850 MHz)Qualcomm Adreno 530 ( - 653 MHz)
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.qualcomm.comwww.qualcomm.com
L1 Cache256 KB
L2 Cache1.5 MB

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - SD 660
0.5 pt (40%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
0 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
0 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 15088     avg: 19093     median: 19488.5 (16%)     max: 21016 Points
min: 15027     avg: 21197     median: 22353.5 (19%)     max: 22860 Points
min: 1665     avg: 1968     median: 2028 (24%)     max: 2109 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 2238     avg: 2695     median: 2752 (31%)     max: 2815 Points
min: 1493     avg: 1916     median: 2009 (23%)     max: 2123 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 SD 660 +
min: 294     avg: 322.8     median: 330.5 (14%)     max: 336 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 SD 660 +
min: 1304     avg: 1445     median: 1440.5 (3%)     max: 1595 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 SD 660 +
min: 313     avg: 321.5     median: 321.5 (1%)     max: 330 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 SD 660 +
min: 1127     avg: 1305     median: 1305 (4%)     max: 1483 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1431     avg: 1598     median: 1617 (16%)     max: 1646 Points
min: 1746     avg: 1827     median: 1834.5 (18%)     max: 1891 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 4895     avg: 5694     median: 5850 (7%)     max: 5913 Points
min: 3327     avg: 4102     median: 4356 (5%)     max: 4369 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1609     avg: 1628     median: 1628 (22%)     max: 1647 Points
min: 1482     avg: 1675     median: 1685.5 (23%)     max: 1881 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5846     avg: 5860     median: 5859.5 (14%)     max: 5873 Points
min: 3983     avg: 4164     median: 4201.5 (10%)     max: 4292 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
100%
1 SD 660 +
min: 1038     avg: 1079     median: 1079 (9%)     max: 1120 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
100%
1 SD 660 +
min: 2981     avg: 2996     median: 2995.5 (27%)     max: 3010 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
100%
1 SD 660 +
min: 9892     avg: 10223     median: 10223 (20%)     max: 10554 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
100%
1 SD 660 +
min: 5295     avg: 5302     median: 5301.5 (11%)     max: 5308 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
100%
1 SD 660 +
min: 6031     avg: 6141     median: 6141 (16%)     max: 6251 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 3796     avg: 4115     median: 3954 (5%)     max: 4769 ms
min: 2400     avg: 2832     median: 2617 (3%)     max: 4141 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 SD 660 +
630 ms (7%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 8463     avg: 9973     median: 10070 (9%)     max: 10945 Points
min: 5511     avg: 9098     median: 9493 (9%)     max: 10506 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
100%
1 SD 660 +
min: 47     avg: 57.1     median: 59 (12%)     max: 63 Points
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Metal
100%
1 SD 821 +
min: 2938     avg: 3334     median: 3334 (89%)     max: 3730 Points
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Multicore Beta
100%
1 SD 821 +
min: 3235     avg: 3254     median: 3253.5 (72%)     max: 3272 Points
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Browser
100%
1 SD 821 +
min: 6032     avg: 6152     median: 6151.5 (81%)     max: 6271 Points
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
min: 105973     avg: 116194     median: 117165 (40%)     max: 120479 Points
min: 138072     avg: 147293     median: 149386 (51%)     max: 159866 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEM
min: 6301     avg: 7335     median: 7220.5 (22%)     max: 8424 Points
min: 5377     avg: 6815     median: 6006 (18%)     max: 9063 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UX
min: 33509     avg: 37799     median: 38669.5 (47%)     max: 39182 Points
min: 35656     avg: 39007     median: 39646 (49%)     max: 41720 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPU
min: 21675     avg: 28666     median: 30372.5 (9%)     max: 30829 Points
min: 56935     avg: 61408     median: 58997 (18%)     max: 68292 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPU
min: 48764     avg: 63355     median: 64877.5 (40%)     max: 66862 Points
min: 32615     avg: 45268     median: 49601 (30%)     max: 53589 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score
min: 116346     avg: 137699     median: 140898 (25%)     max: 143551 Points
min: 142395     avg: 152499     median: 156176 (28%)     max: 158926 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
100%
1 SD 660 +
min: 26647     avg: 30836     median: 32596 (27%)     max: 33266 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
100%
1 SD 660 +
min: 28919     avg: 31931     median: 32883 (27%)     max: 33992 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
100%
1 SD 660 +
min: 33505     avg: 36822     median: 35936 (7%)     max: 41026 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
100%
1 SD 660 +
min: 62411     avg: 68266     median: 66442 (24%)     max: 75946 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
100%
1 SD 660 +
min: 157877     avg: 167856     median: 161462 (16%)     max: 184230 Points
AndEBench - AndEBench Java
100%
1 SD 660 +
3240 Iter./s (100%)
AndEBench - AndEBench Native
100%
1 SD 660 +
28882 Iter./s (95%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
min: 2487     avg: 125771     median: 186416 (25%)     max: 188411 Points
215105 Points (28%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
100%
1 SD 660 +
6514 Points (30%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
min: 3032     avg: 3285     median: 3363 (18%)     max: 3486 Points
min: 2947     avg: 3112     median: 3111.5 (16%)     max: 3276 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
min: 2889     avg: 4395     median: 4250 (9%)     max: 5913 Points
min: 2983     avg: 3426     median: 3426 (7%)     max: 3869 Points
min: 5152     avg: 5648     median: 5437 (36%)     max: 6461 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
min: 6274     avg: 6676     median: 6723 (34%)     max: 7026 Points
min: 4739     avg: 5697     median: 5440.5 (27%)     max: 7659 Points

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 → 100% n=20

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro → 99% n=20

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 26. 00:03:48

#0 checking url part for id 9944 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 8301 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 25 Apr 2024 05:38:32 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.02s ... 0.022s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.022s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 9944 +0.015s ... 0.036s

#7 got single benchmarks 9944 +0.038s ... 0.074s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 8301 +0.003s ... 0.077s

#9 got single benchmarks 8301 +0.023s ... 0.1s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.1s

#11 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.007s ... 0.107s

#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.006s ... 0.113s

#13 min, max, avg, median took s +0.148s ... 0.261s

#14 return log +0.034s ... 0.295s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)