• Translated pages UID: 4063, Title:
  • Translated pages UID: 4064, Title:
    Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus APQ8060A vs
    , , , , , ,
    search relation.
    , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
     

    Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus APQ8060A vs

    Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus APQ8060A

    ► remove from comparison Qualcomm S4 Plus APQ8060A

    The Qualcomm APQ8060A (Snapdragon S4 series) is a ARM based high-end smartphone SoC in 2012. It contains two Krait (ARMv7) CPU cores, a Adreno 225 GPU (400 MHz), a LPDDR2 memory controller (up to 500 MHz). Compared to the MSM8260A it does not feature radio elements like GSM, GPRS, UMTS or LTE (only WLAN and BT). The chip is produced in 28nm LP (low power process) at TSMC.

    The Krait cores offer a slightly better performance as the standard Cortex-A9 cores and are compatible to the NEON SIMD extensions.

    Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus APQ8060A
    Qualcomm Snapdragon
    ARMv7
    Series:
    Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Pro APQ8064A compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 ARMv7
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928 compare1.6 GHz4 / 4 ARMv7
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8028 compare1.6 GHz4 / 4 ARMv7
    Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Pro MSM8960T compare1.7 GHz2 / 2 ARMv7
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 8930AB compare1.7 GHz2 / 2 ARMv7
    » Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus APQ8060A1.5 GHz2 / 2 ARMv7
    Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 ARMv7
    Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8260A compare1.7 GHz2 / 2 ARMv7
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8926 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 ARMv7
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8226 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 ARMv7
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8026 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 ARMv7
    Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8930 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 ARMv7
    Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM82301.2 GHz2 / 2 ARMv7
    Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM82301.2 GHz2 / 2 ARMv7
    Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8227 compare1 GHz2 / 2 ARMv7
    Qualcomm Snapdragon S3 MSM8660 compare1.7 GHz2 / 2 ARMv7
    Qualcomm Snapdragon S3 MSM8260 compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 ARMv7
    Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 QSD8250 compare1 GHz1 / 1 ARMv7
    1500 MHz
    64 KB
    1 MB
    2 / 2
    28
    iGPUQualcomm Adreno 225 (266 MHz)
    ArchitectureARM

    Benchmarks

    3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
    5324 Points (3%)
    86%
     +
    min: 4020     avg: 4586     median: 4586 (3%)     max: 5152 Points
    3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
    5422 Points (6%)
    74%
     +
    4038 Points (4%)
    3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
    5570 Points (6%)
    Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
    624 Points (5%)
    86%
     +
    536 Points (4%)
    Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
    1677 Points (15%)
    79%
     +
    1320 Points (12%)
    Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
    2109 Points (4%)
    72%
     +
    1515 Points (3%)
    Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
    963 Points (2%)
    70%
     +
    670 Points (1%)
    Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
    1473 Points (4%)
    73%
     +
    1082 Points (3%)
    Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
    100%
    1  +
    457 (1%)
    Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
    100%
    1  +
    454 (9%)
    Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Multi Thread
    182 MFLOPS (6%)
    107%
     +
    min: 183.533     avg: 195     median: 194.6 (7%)     max: 205.691 MFLOPS
    Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
    104 MFLOPS (10%)
    83%
     +
    min: 37.712     avg: 85.8     median: 85.8 (8%)     max: 133.919 MFLOPS
    Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
    43092 ms (72%)
    264%
     +
    16231 ms (27%)
    Sunspider - Sunspider 0.9.1 Total Score *
    min: 942.2     avg: 1297     median: 997.3 (9%)     max: 1951.4 ms
    99%
     +
    min: 1054.8     avg: 1261     median: 1124.7 (11%)     max: 1604.1 ms
    Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
    100%
    1  +
    min: 1154     avg: 1812     median: 1811.7 (20%)     max: 2469.3 ms
    Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
    5015 points (12%)
    93%
     +
    min: 4202     avg: 4658     median: 4658 (11%)     max: 5114 points
    AnTuTu v3 - AnTuTu v3 CPU
    100%
    1  +
    2394 Points (16%)
    AnTuTu v4 - AnTuTu v4 Total Score
    100%
    1  +
    14895 Points (35%)
    AndEBench - AndEBench Java
    100%
    1  +
    236 Iter./s (7%)
    AndEBench - AndEBench Native
    100%
    1  +
    5123 Iter./s (17%)
    PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile CPU Tests
    100%
    1  +
    min: 3723     avg: 4294     median: 4294 (1%)     max: 4865 Points

    Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus APQ8060A → 100% n=12

    Average Benchmarks → 99% n=12

    - Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
    - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
    * Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
    1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

    Add one or more devices and compare

    In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

    restrict list:

    show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
    v1.16
    log 17. 18:41:50

    #0 checking url part for id 3588 +0s ... 0s

    #1 checking url part for id 4062 +0s ... 0s

    #2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

    #3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 15 Sep 2021 13:09:12 +0200 +0s ... 0s

    #4 composed specs +0.049s ... 0.05s

    #5 did output specs +0s ... 0.05s

    #6 getting avg benchmarks for device 3588 +0.001s ... 0.05s

    #7 got single benchmarks 3588 +0.007s ... 0.057s

    #8 getting avg benchmarks for device 4062 +0s ... 0.058s

    #9 got single benchmarks 4062 +0.007s ... 0.065s

    #10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.065s

    #11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.011s ... 0.076s

    #12 return log +0.004s ... 0.08s

    Please share our article, every link counts!
    > Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
    Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)