Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B vs AMD Ryzen 5 2400G vs AMD Ryzen 7 2800H

AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B

► remove from comparison AMD Ryzen V1605B

The AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B is an embedded APU for mini PCs and embedded solutions that was announced in February 2017. Compared to the similar consumer Ryzen 5 2500U, the V1605B offers different support and availability options.

It includes four Zen cores clocked at 2 to 3.6 GHz and offers 4 MB L3-Cache. The integrated graphics card is called Radeon RX Vega 8 and offers 8 CUs (512 Shaders) clocked at up to 1100 MHz. The TDP is configurable between 12 and 25 Watt (15 Watt nominal). More information on Raven Ridge can be found in our launch article.

AMD Ryzen 5 2400G

► remove from comparison AMD R5 2400G

The AMD Ryzen 5 2400G is a desktop APU that was announced in early 2018. It is the fastest Raven Ridge APU at that time and features all four Zen cores (8 threads due to SMT support) clocked at 3.6 - 3.9 GHz with a Radeon RX Vega 11 graphics card with 11 CUs (all of the 704 Shaders on the chip) clocked at up to 1250 MHz. The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR-2933. The TDP is specified at 65 Watt and the CPU, GPU and memory are unlocked for overclocking. More information on Raven Ridge can be found in our launch article.

AMD Ryzen 7 2800H

► remove from comparison AMD R7 2800H

The AMD Ryzen 7 2800H is a mobile SoC that was announced late 2018. It is intended for mid-sized to big laptops and combines four Zen cores (8 threads) clocked at 3.3 (base) - 3.8 GHz (boost) with a Radeon RX Vega 11 Mobile graphics card with 11 CUs (704 Shaders). The integrated dual-channel memory controller supports up to DDR4-3200 memory.

Compared to the older Ryzen 7 2700U for slim and light laptops, the 2800H offers a higher TDP (45 Watt versus 15 Watt), higher clocked memory, a higher base clock (3.4 versus 2.2 GHz), and a faster integrated GPU.

More information on Raven Ridge can be found in our launch article.

Performance

While we have not tested a single system built around the 2800H as of August 2023, it's safe to expect the chip to be 10% to 15% faster than Ryzen 3 1200, as far as multi-thread performance is concerned.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are, and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Power consumption

This Ryzen 7 has a default TDP (also known as the long-term power limit) of 45 W, a value that laptop manufacturers are free to change to anything between 35 W and 54 W with clock speeds and performance changing correspondingly. All the values are rather high, making a high-performance cooling solution with two or three fans pretty much a necessity.

The CPU is built on an old, as of late 2022, 14 nm process for subpar energy efficiency.

ModelAMD Ryzen Embedded V1605BAMD Ryzen 5 2400GAMD Ryzen 7 2800H
SeriesAMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU)AMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU)AMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU)
CodenameZenZenRaven Ridge (Zen)
Series: Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU) Zen
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G3.6 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U2.2 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U2.2 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G3.5 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 2600H3.2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B « 2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 2300U2 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U2 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen Embedded R1606G2.6 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 2200U2.5 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U2.5 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen Embedded R1505G2.4 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Athlon 300U2.4 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G « 3.6 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U2.2 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U2.2 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G3.5 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 2600H3.2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 2300U2 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U2 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen Embedded R1606G2.6 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 2200U2.5 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U2.5 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen Embedded R1505G2.4 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Athlon 300U2.4 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Clock2000 - 3600 MHz3600 - 3900 MHz3300 - 3800 MHz
L1 Cache384 KB384 KB192 KB
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB2 MB
L3 Cache4 MB4 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 84 / 84 / 8
TDP15 Watt65 Watt45 Watt
Transistors4500 Million4500 Million4500 Million
Technology14 nm14 nm14 nm
max. Temp.105 °C95 °C
SocketAM4AM4FP5
FeaturesXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA
iGPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) ( - 1100 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 ( - 1250 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 ( - 1300 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comproducts.amd.comwww.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ryzen V1605B
25.3 pt (35%)
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R5 2400G
28.2 pt (39%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
3160 Points (3%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
841 Points (36%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
334 Points (37%)
min: 381     avg: 382.5     median: 382.5 (43%)     max: 384 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
1235 Points (3%)
min: 1804     avg: 1850     median: 1849.5 (5%)     max: 1895 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
654 Points (4%)
min: 828     avg: 844     median: 846.5 (5%)     max: 856 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
128 Points (39%)
min: 153.2     avg: 155.6     median: 155.7 (47%)     max: 158 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
9.5 Points (12%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
1.8 Points (44%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
4805 Points (29%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
21024 Points (15%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
30473 Points (21%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
7495 Points (9%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
198 s (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
6.9 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
3846 Points (6%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
16708 MIPS (10%)
min: 19478     avg: 20059     median: 19885 (11%)     max: 20814 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
3374 MIPS (40%)
min: 3855     avg: 3972     median: 3909 (47%)     max: 4153 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
48 fps (17%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
171.6 fps (40%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
3.6 fps (6%)
min: 4.86     avg: 12.2     median: 5.1 (9%)     max: 26.5 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.5 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.8 GB/s (14%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
5.2 GB/s (14%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
791 Seconds (6%)
min: 550     avg: 551     median: 550.5 (4%)     max: 551 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.8 sec (17%)
min: 0.648     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (15%)     max: 0.683 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
6672 Points (14%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
11.3 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
25.1 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
624 s (3%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
7177 Points (19%)
min: 7325     avg: 8058     median: 8241 (22%)     max: 8607 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
58446 Points (47%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
57457 Points (47%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 32977     avg: 55118     median: 65172 (55%)     max: 67206 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
6640 Points (17%)
min: 6650     avg: 7355     median: 7465 (19%)     max: 7951 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
9195 Points (16%)
min: 10705     avg: 10784     median: 10784 (19%)     max: 10863 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
3033 Points (13%)
min: 3198     avg: 3414     median: 3414 (14%)     max: 3630 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
819 Points (35%)
min: 970     avg: 1081     median: 1001 (42%)     max: 1223 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
3184 Points (6%)
min: 3462     avg: 4780     median: 3885 (7%)     max: 6372 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
846 Points (4%)
min: 967     avg: 989     median: 990 (4%)     max: 1010 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
3264 Points (10%)
min: 3557     avg: 3736     median: 3825 (12%)     max: 3826 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
3800 Points (38%)
min: 4181     avg: 4319     median: 4268 (43%)     max: 4508 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
12100 Points (13%)
min: 13259     avg: 13858     median: 13653 (15%)     max: 14662 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
4226 Points (58%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
13211 Points (32%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
1258 ms (1%)
min: 962     avg: 980     median: 978 (1%)     max: 1000 ms
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
149 Points (31%)
min: 169     avg: 170.7     median: 170 (35%)     max: 173 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 100.5     avg: 103.5     median: 103.5 (18%)     max: 106.5 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 95.3     avg: 99.7     median: 99.7 (18%)     max: 104.1 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
9 Points per Watt (7%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B → 0% n=

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 5 2400G → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 29. 01:59:28

#0 checking url part for id 13197 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 9894 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 10144 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 05:35:32 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.034s ... 0.035s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.035s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 13197 +0.017s ... 0.052s

#8 got single benchmarks 13197 +0.009s ... 0.061s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 9894 +0.016s ... 0.077s

#10 got single benchmarks 9894 +0.014s ... 0.091s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 10144 +0.003s ... 0.095s

#12 got single benchmarks 10144 +0s ... 0.095s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.095s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.278s ... 0.373s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.373s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)