Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 vs AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470

AMD Ryzen AI 9 365

► remove from comparison AMD Ryzen AI 9 365

The Ryzen AI 9 365 is a relatively powerful Strix Point family processor that debuted in June 2024. The chip features 10 CPU cores running at 2.0 GHz to 5.0 GHz, along with the 12 CU RDNA 3.5 Radeon 880M graphics adapter and the 50 TOPS XDNA 2 neural engine. Other key features include PCIe 4, USB 4 and LPDDR5x-7500 RAM support.

Of the 10 CPU cores, 4 are full Zen 5 cores with the other 6 being smaller Zen 5c cores. The latter probably run at somewhat lower clock speeds than the former. In the meantime, the more expensive Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 has both more CPU cores and a faster 16 CU integrated graphics adapter.

Architecture and Features

Strix Point family APUs are powered by Zen 5 and Zen 5c microarchitecture cores found in two separate clusters, the latter being a slightly slower, smaller and more energy-efficient version of the former. One of the differences between Zen 5 and Zen 5c is cache size; Zen 5 cores have larger caches to work with.

Either way, mobile Zen 5 implementation is reportedly (ChipsAndCheese) closer to desktop Zen 4 than to desktop Zen 5 due to differing cache sizes, vast differences in AVX-512 throughput and other factors.

Elsewhere, the Ryzen AI 9 chip supports DDR5-5600 and LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, giving system designers a choice between lower latency and higher throughput respectively. The chip is natively compatible with USB 4 (and therefore Thunderbolt). It has PCIe 4.0 support for throughput of 1.9 GB/s per lane, just like its 8000 series predecessors did. The integrated XDNA 2 NPU, which is a lot more complex than first-gen XDNA was, delivers up to 50 INT8 TOPS for accelerating various AI workloads.

As is usual for laptop CPUs, the Ryzen is not user-replaceable as it gets soldered down for good.

Performance

At 30 W, this Ryzen AI 9 series CPU is only just fast enough to compete with much older chips such as the Ryzen 9 4900H and Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS in multi-threaded benchmarks, suggesting power efficiency is the focus here rather than sheer performance.

Graphics

The Radeon 880M is the direct successor to the 780M. It packs just a few differences under the hood, such as faster caches; its 12 RDNA 3.5 architecture CUs/WGPs (768 unified shaders) run at up to 2,900 MHz. With well over 30 fps in both Once Human and The First Descendant (1080p - Low), this iGPU is certainly fast enough for a fair bit of casual as well as competitive gaming.

Naturally, the Radeon is capable of driving four SUHD 4320p60 monitors simultaneously. It can also efficiently encode and decode the most popular video codecs such as AVC, HEVC, VP9 and AV1. The latest addition to that list, the VVC codec, is not supported unlike it is with Intel Lunar Lake chips.

Power consumption

The 365 is supposed to have a base TDP of 28 W, with laptop makers free to crank it up to up to 54 W. Which they will most likely do to maximize performance. According to AMD the configurable TDP (cTDP) ranges from 15 to 54 Watt.

The 4 nm TSMC process that these CPUs are built with makes for above average, as of late 2024, energy efficiency.

AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470

► remove from comparison AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 is a powerful Gorgon Point family processor that debuted at CES in early 2026. The SoC is a refresh of the Strix Point HX 375 with higher clocked CPU and GPU. The APU comes equipped with 12 CPU cores running at 2.0 GHz to 5.2 GHz along with the 16 CU RDNA 3.5 Radeon 890M graphics adapter and the 55 TOPS XDNA 2 neural engine. Other noteworthy features include PCIe 4, USB 4 and LPDDR5x-8533 RAM support.

Of the 12 CPU cores, 4 are full Zen 5 cores and 8 are smaller Zen 5c cores. The latter probably run at somewhat lower clock speeds than the former.

This Ryzen AI 9 series APU shares most of the specifications with the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370.

Architecture and Features

Gorgon Point family APUs are a refresh of Strix Point 300 series APUs and offer higher clock speeds and support for faster LPDDR5x memory. It features the same Zen 5 and Zen 5c microarchitecture cores, the latter being a slightly slower, smaller and more power-efficient version of the full Zen 5 core. One of the differences between Zen 5 and Zen 5c is the cache size; Zen 5 cores have larger caches to work with. According to AMD, Zen 5 APUs deliver a 16% IPC improvement over Zen 4-powered APUs thanks to branch prediction improvements and other refinements.

Elsewhere, the HX 470 supports LPDDR5x-8533 and DDR5-6400 RAM, and is also natively compatible with USB 4 (and therefore Thunderbolt). It has PCIe 4.0 support for a throughput of 1.9 GB/s per lane, just like its 8000 series predecessors did. The integrated XDNA 2 NPU is a lot more complex than the original XDNA was for up to 55 INT8 TOPS for accelerating various AI workloads. 

Performance

Given the striking similarity in specs, the performance of the Ryzen AI 9 HX 475 and 470 should be only slightly better than the old Ryzen AI 9 HX 375. Therefore, the SoC is a very fast mobile CPU that is well suited for demanding applications and games (with enough cooling and a high TDP setting).

Graphics

The Radeon 890M is the most powerful AMD iGPU, as of mid 2024. It features 16 RDNA 3.5 architecture CUs (1024 unified shaders) running at up to 3,100 MHz. Performance-wise, the graphics adapter can be as slow as the Arc 8 or as fast as the RTX 2050 Laptop depending on the benchmark or game. On average, the 890M finds itself very close to the GTX 1650 Laptop making it possible to play 2024 AAA games at 1080p with most settings set to Low.

Naturally, the AMD iGPU is capable of driving four SUHD 4320p60 monitors and it can also efficiently encode and decode the most popular video codecs including first and foremost AVC, HEVC, VP9 and AV1. The latest addition to that list, the VVC codec, is not supported unlike it is with Intel Lunar Lake chips.

Power consumption

The HX 470 is supposed to have a base TDP of 28 W, with laptop makers free to crank it up to up to 54 W if needed. Which they will most likely do to maximize performance.

The TSMC N4P process that the CPU cores are built with make for decent, as of mid 2024, power efficiency.

ModelAMD Ryzen AI 9 365AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470
CodenameStrix Point (Zen 5)Gorgon Point
SeriesAMD Strix / Gorgon PointAMD Strix / Gorgon Point
Series: Strix / Gorgon Point Gorgon Point
AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 « 2 - 5 GHz10 / 20 cores24 MB L3
AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 compare2 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme compare2 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 475 compare2 - 5.2 GHz12 / 24 cores24 MB L3
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 compare2 - 5.2 GHz12 / 24 cores24 MB L3
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 « 2 - 5.2 GHz12 / 24 cores24 MB L3
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470 compare2 - 5.2 GHz12 / 24 cores24 MB L3
AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 compare2 - 5 GHz10 / 20 cores24 MB L3
AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 compare2 - 5 GHz10 / 20 cores24 MB L3
AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 compare2 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 compare2 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 compare2 - 4.6 GHz6 / 12 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 compare2 - 4.8 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 compare2 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 compare2 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores8 MB L3
AMD Ryzen AI 5 430 compare2 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Clock2000 - 5000 MHz2000 - 5200 MHz
L1 Cache800 KB960 KB
L2 Cache10 MB12 MB
L3 Cache24 MB24 MB
Cores / Threads10 / 20
4 x 5.0 GHz AMD Zen 5
6 x AMD Zen 5c
12 / 24
4 x 5.2 GHz AMD Zen 5
8 x 3.3 GHz AMD Zen 5c
TDP28 Watt54 Watt
Technology4 nm4 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketFP8FP8
FeaturesDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, USB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4ALPDDR5x-8533 RAM, PCIe 4, USB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (55 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
iGPUAMD Radeon 880M ( - 2900 MHz)AMD Radeon 890M ( - 3100 MHz)
NPU / AI50 TOPS INT855 TOPS INT8
Chip AI73 TOPS INT886 TOPS INT8
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comwww.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ryzen AI 9 365
41.9 pt (70%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ryzen AI 9 HX 470
44.2 pt (74%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 102.7     avg: 112.1     median: 113.5 (56%)     max: 116.3 Points
119 Points (59%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 590     avg: 907     median: 992.5 (18%)     max: 1112 Points
1118 Points (21%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 11462     avg: 17784     median: 18698 (17%)     max: 20649 Points
23208 Points (22%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1942     avg: 1985     median: 1992 (81%)     max: 2001 Points
2072 Points (84%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 758     avg: 780     median: 782 (85%)     max: 787 Points
815 Points (89%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 5247     avg: 7126     median: 7303 (18%)     max: 8070 Points
9120 Points (22%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1950     avg: 2759     median: 2842 (18%)     max: 3075 Points
3494 Points (22%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 195.7     avg: 287.2     median: 303 (84%)     max: 306 Points
318 Points (88%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 27.35     avg: 30.8     median: 30.8 (40%)     max: 34.29 Points
42.2 Points (55%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 3.47     avg: 3.5     median: 3.5 (84%)     max: 3.62 Points
3.8 Points (90%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 8436     avg: 8446     median: 8446 (51%)     max: 8456 Points
8878 Points (54%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 42669     avg: 45453     median: 45452.5 (33%)     max: 48236 Points
59515 Points (43%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
104121 Points (66%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
16313 Points (20%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
302.8 s (4%)
66.8 s (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
6.7 s (1%)
2.7 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 4480     avg: 11937     median: 11936.5 (19%)     max: 19393 Points
4983 Points (8%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 47754     avg: 65201     median: 69773 (40%)     max: 71722 MIPS
73258 MIPS (42%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5790     avg: 5984     median: 6017 (71%)     max: 6062 MIPS
6368 MIPS (75%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
96.8 fps (2%)
168 fps (4%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
258.7 fps (7%)
300 fps (8%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 18.6     avg: 21.8     median: 22.4 (39%)     max: 24.5 fps
24.9 fps (44%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.3 GB/s (38%)
1.7 GB/s (50%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 2.1     avg: 2.2     median: 2.2 (38%)     max: 2.3 GB/s
2.8 GB/s (48%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 11.8     avg: 12.6     median: 12.6 (33%)     max: 13.3 GB/s
14.4 GB/s (38%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 243     avg: 300.9     median: 270 (3%)     max: 429 Seconds
214 Seconds (3%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 160     avg: 192.3     median: 175 (1%)     max: 270 Seconds
141 Seconds (1%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4091     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4272 sec
0.4 sec (9%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 13687     avg: 14361     median: 14360.5 (24%)     max: 15034 Points
min: 16233     avg: 16908     median: 16908 (28%)     max: 17583 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
8.4 s (2%)
8.1 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 17.8     avg: 17.9     median: 17.9 (1%)     max: 17.9 s
17.2 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
415.6 s (2%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 77702     avg: 78625     median: 78625 (60%)     max: 79548 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 17153     avg: 19025     median: 18698 (46%)     max: 20777 Points
min: 18299     avg: 19651     median: 19650.5 (48%)     max: 21002 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
61739 Points (50%)
min: 73158     avg: 76878     median: 76877.5 (62%)     max: 80597 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 73160     avg: 76778     median: 76777.5 (62%)     max: 80395 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 77353     avg: 78235     median: 78234.5 (63%)     max: 79116 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 13210     avg: 17120     median: 18270.5 (46%)     max: 18728 Points
min: 20671     avg: 21278     median: 21277.5 (54%)     max: 21884 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 19564     avg: 27580     median: 28875 (51%)     max: 29894 Points
min: 28631     avg: 29988     median: 29987.5 (53%)     max: 31344 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 7753     avg: 10008     median: 10247 (43%)     max: 10783 Points
min: 8415     avg: 9516     median: 9515.5 (40%)     max: 10616 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
min: 2778     avg: 2832     median: 2815 (65%)     max: 2920 Points
min: 2881     avg: 2925     median: 2924.5 (68%)     max: 2968 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
min: 12627     avg: 14265     median: 14262 (48%)     max: 15137 Points
min: 11437     avg: 13730     median: 13729.5 (47%)     max: 16022 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
2709 Points (86%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
11056 Points (45%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2062     avg: 2080     median: 2070 (70%)     max: 2104 Points
1967 Points (66%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 9599     avg: 12817     median: 13115 (23%)     max: 14182 Points
12418 Points (22%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
2006 Points (9%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
12413 Points (39%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
8159 Points (81%)
7998 Points (80%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
43651 Points (43%)
50028 Points (49%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 430     avg: 440.5     median: 436.5 (1%)     max: 456 ms
414 ms (0%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 106359     avg: 112650     median: 110756 (72%)     max: 120835 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 255     avg: 271.9     median: 265 (66%)     max: 330 Points
268 Points (67%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 289     avg: 317.2     median: 318.5 (53%)     max: 336 Points
331 Points (56%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1658     avg: 1768     median: 1742 (61%)     max: 1964 Points
1732 Points (61%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 38.9     avg: 77.8     median: 75.8 (13%)     max: 116.1 Watt
83.6 Watt (14%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 72.1     avg: 86.4     median: 83.2 (15%)     max: 113.2 Watt
89.7 Watt (16%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 3.47     avg: 7.2     median: 8.2 (5%)     max: 9.7 Watt
7.7 Watt (5%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 6.86     avg: 8.6     median: 8.5 (6%)     max: 11 Watt
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 32.5     avg: 35.4     median: 34.3 (26%)     max: 39.4 Points per Watt
39 Points per Watt (29%)
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Average Benchmarks

AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 → 100% n=44

AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 → 121% n=44

Average of the median scores above. 1 ... This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.35
log 12. 14:43:32

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 17625 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 20417 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1773323012s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 10 Mar 2026 10:47:11 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.008s ... 0.008s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 17625 +0.003s ... 0.011s

#8 got single benchmarks 17625 +0.013s ... 0.025s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 20417 +0.004s ... 0.028s

#10 got single benchmarks 20417 +0.005s ... 0.033s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.033s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.047s ... 0.08s

#13 return log +0.122s ... 0.202s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
Google Logo Add as a preferred
source on Google
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)