, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

ATI Radeon Xpress X1200 vs ATI Radeon Xpress X1270

ATI Radeon Xpress X1200

► remove from comparison ATI Radeon Xpress X1200

The Radeon Xpress X1200 (RS600M or RS690M) is an onboard graphics card for notebooks / laptops and according to AMD optimized for a good price/value. It is based on a X700 design but with less pixel- and vertex-pipelines.

The exact core clock is not clear as it varies from 350 MHz (according to Wikipedia) to 500 MHz (some GPU-Z versions). The different RS600 and RS690 (Xpress X1200, X1250, and X1270) offer the same graphics core, but may have a different core clock. Still the performance should be compareable.

ATI Radeon Xpress X1200 is hardly apt for gamers. Only old games like Quake 3 Arena can be played in 1024x768 with high/medium details fluently. Even Warcraft 3 runs fluently with minimum details. Current, damanding games like FEAR, Doom3 and Quake 4 can hardly be played (e.g. 2 frames per second in battle scenes in Quake 4). Some strategy games like Age of Empires 3 can only be played with minimal details (20-25 fps, tested with a FSC Amilo Pa 2510).

The graphic chip supports Windows Vista Aero surface and all 3D effects run fluently. Due to HyperMemory Aero is supported with high resolutions (tested with 1280x800 + 1920x1200).

Technically the chip has 4 pixel-pipelines and either a texture unit (with 2 vertex shaders) or no vertex shaders (each source tells a different story).

The current consumption of the desktop version lies around 13.8 Watt (TDP) and 8 Watt average. The mobile versions could be more economic as they offer Powerplay support.

ATI Radeon Xpress X1270

► remove from comparison

The Radeon Xpress X1270 (RS690M) is an onboard graphics card for notebooks / laptops and according to AMD optimized for a good price/value. It is based on a X700 design but with less pixel- and vertex-pipelines.

The different RS600 and RS690 (Xpress X1200, X1250, and X1270) offer the same graphics core, but may have a different core clock. Still the performance should be compareable.

ATI Radeon Xpress X1270 is hardly apt for gamers. Only old games like Quake 3 Arena can be played in 1024x768 with high/medium details fluently. Even Warcraft 3 runs fluently with minimum details. Current, damanding games like FEAR, Doom3 and Quake 4 can hardly be played (e.g. 2 frames per second in battle scenes in Quake 4). Some strategy games like Age of Empires 3 can only be played with minimal details.

The graphic chip supports Windows Vista Aero surface and all 3D effects run fluently.

Technically the chip has 4 pixel-pipelines and either a texture unit (with 2 vertex shaders) or no vertex shaders (each source tells a different story).

The current consumption of the desktop version lies around 13.8 Watt (TDP) and 8 Watt average. The mobile versions could be more economic as they offer Powerplay support.

ATI Radeon Xpress X1200ATI Radeon Xpress X1270
ManufacturerATIATI
Radeon Xpress X1200 Series
Radeon Xpress X1270 4/0 cores @ 0.4 GHz
Radeon Xpress X1250 compare 4/0 cores @ 0.35 GHz
Radeon Xpress X1200 4/0 cores @ 0.35 GHz
Radeon Xpress X1270 4/0 cores @ 0.4 GHz
Radeon Xpress X1250 compare 4/0 cores @ 0.35 GHz
Radeon Xpress X1200 4/0 cores @ 0.35 GHz
CodenameRS690MM690T
Pipelines4 / 0 Pixel- / Vertexshader4 / 0 Pixel- / Vertexshader
Core Speed350 MHz400 MHz
Max. Amount of Memory128 MB128 MB
Shared Memoryyesyes
DirectXDirectX 9, Shader 2.0DirectX 9, Shader 2.0
technology80 nm80 nm
Features80/90nm, Avivo Video ProcessorPowerPlay 7.0, 80 or 90nm process, HDMI support!
Date of Announcement01.02.2007 01.02.2007
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttp://www.amd.com/gb-uk/Processors/Prod...http://www.amd.com/gb-uk/Processors/Prod...

Benchmarks

3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
3824 Points (4%)
min: 3166     avg: 4859     median: 5217 (5%)     max: 5860 Points
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
1334 Points (1%)
min: 1200     avg: 1673     median: 1720 (1%)     max: 1970 Points
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 831     avg: 839     median: 831 (1%)     max: 855 Points
min: 773     avg: 983     median: 990 (1%)     max: 1190 Points
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings + ATI Radeon Xpress X1200
3DMark 06
278 (1%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x800 + ATI Radeon Xpress X1200
3DMark 06
235 Points (0%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x800 + ATI Radeon Xpress X1270
min: 337     avg: 363     median: 369.5 (1%)     max: 374 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + ATI Radeon Xpress X1270
3DMark 06
min: 320     avg: 328     median: 327.5 (1%)     max: 335 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1024x768 + ATI Radeon Xpress X1270
3DMark 06
291 Points (1%)
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Grafik (Spiele)
3.1 Points (46%)
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Grafik
3.2 Points (47%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + ATI Radeon Xpress X1270
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 540     avg: 618     median: 559 (3%)     max: 755

Average Benchmarks ATI Radeon Xpress X1200 → 100% n=4

Average Benchmarks ATI Radeon Xpress X1270 → 135% n=4

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

F.E.A.R.

F.E.A.R.

2005
low 640x480
100%
Radeon Xpress X1200:
29 57 ~ 43 fps
167%
Radeon Xpress X1270:
67 76 ~ 72 fps
med. 800x600
100%
Radeon Xpress X1200:
4 12 ~ 8 fps
188%
Radeon Xpress X1270:
15 15 ~ 15 fps
high 1024x768
100%
Radeon Xpress X1200:
1  fps
200%
Radeon Xpress X1270:
2 2 ~ 2 fps
Doom 3

Doom 3

2004
low 640x480
100%
Radeon Xpress X1200:
13.4 24.9 ~ 19 fps
med. 640x480
100%
Radeon Xpress X1200:
14.7 24.5 ~ 20 fps
high 800x600
100%
Radeon Xpress X1200:
10 17 ~ 14 fps
ultra 1024x768
100%
Radeon Xpress X1200:
7.7 10.7 ~ 9 fps
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

1999
high 1024x768
100%
Radeon Xpress X1200:
83.8  fps
113%
Radeon Xpress X1270:
88 89.8 107 ~ 95 fps

Average Gaming ATI Radeon Xpress X1200 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming ATI Radeon Xpress X1270 → 167%

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.16
log 31. 09:23:30

#0 checking url part for id 110 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 111 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 29 Jul 2021 17:21:20 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.042s ... 0.043s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.043s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.043s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 110 +0.023s ... 0.066s

#8 got single benchmarks 110 +0.012s ... 0.078s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 111 +0s ... 0.078s

#10 got single benchmarks 111 +0.013s ... 0.091s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.091s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.005s ... 0.096s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.096s

#14 Got 23 rows for game benchmarks. +0.003s ... 0.099s

#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.099s

#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.1s

#17 benchmarks composed for output. +0.003s ... 0.103s

#18 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.103s

#19 return log +0.003s ... 0.106s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)