Notebookcheck Logo

ATI Radeon Xpress 200M vs ATI Radeon Xpress 1250

ATI Radeon Xpress 200M

► remove from comparison ATI Radeon Xpress 200M

ATI Radeon Xpress 200M is the shared memory integrated graphic card from ATI. It is a derivate of the Mobility Radeon X300 graphic card, but slower because of the lack of own memory and slower clock speed. Sometimes it is called Mobility Radeon X200. It is a bit faster than the Intel GMA 950 graphic core and threrefore not really suited for actual gaming.

ATI Radeon Xpress 1250

► remove from comparison ATI Radeon Xpress 1250

The ATI Radeon Xpress 1250 is an integrated graphics card based on the dedicated X300 GPU but without dedicated graphics memory. It should be compatible with Windows Vista Aero.

ATI Radeon Xpress 200MATI Radeon Xpress 1250
Radeon Xpress Series
Radeon Xpress 1250 4/0 cores @ 0.4 GHz
Radeon Xpress 1150 compare 2/4/2 cores @ 0.4 GHz
Radeon Xpress 200M 4/2 cores @ 0.35 GHz
Radeon Xpress 1100 compare 4/2 cores @ 0.3 GHz
Radeon Xpress 1250 4/0 cores @ 0.4 GHz
Radeon Xpress 1150 compare 2/4/2 cores @ 0.4 GHz
Radeon Xpress 200M 4/2 cores @ 0.35 GHz
Radeon Xpress 1100 compare 4/2 cores @ 0.3 GHz
Pipelines4 / 2 Pixel- / Vertexshader4 / 0 Pixel- / Vertexshader
Core Speed350 MHz400 MHz
Max. Amount of Memory0 (shared) MB
Shared Memorynoyes
APIDirectX 9b, Shader 2.0DirectX 9, Shader 2.0
technology130 nm80 nm
FeaturesUp to 256 MB taken from main memory.

Avivo Display, Multimonitor Support, Windows Vista Premium Ready (Aero), MPEG-2 Hardware Decoder, optional HDMI output possible

Date of Announcement18.02.2005 30.08.2006
InformationSame technical features as the X300 core.
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttp://www.ati.com/products/radeonxpress...http://ati.amd.com/products/Radeonxpress...

Benchmarks

3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
min: 3200     avg: 4168     median: 4441 (5%)     max: 4863 Points
min: 3940     avg: 4654     median: 4576 (5%)     max: 5447 Points
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
min: 1100     avg: 1261     median: 1312 (1%)     max: 1370 Points
min: 1310     avg: 1976     median: 2006 (1%)     max: 2580 Points
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 450     avg: 587     median: 648 (1%)     max: 663 Points
min: 869     avg: 988     median: 928 (1%)     max: 1167 Points
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings + ATI Radeon Xpress 200M
3DMark 06
min: 140     avg: 193     median: 193 (0%)     max: 246 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + ATI Radeon Xpress 200M
3DMark 06
202 Points (0%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + ATI Radeon Xpress 1250
445 Points (1%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x800 + ATI Radeon Xpress 1250
3DMark 06
min: 290     avg: 305     median: 305 (0%)     max: 320 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Grafik (Spiele)
3.5 Points (51%)
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Grafik
4.2 Points (62%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + ATI Radeon Xpress 200M
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
194 Points (1%)
Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + ATI Radeon Xpress 1250
669 Points (3%)

Average Benchmarks ATI Radeon Xpress 200M → 100% n=5

Average Benchmarks ATI Radeon Xpress 1250 → 193% n=5

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

F.E.A.R.

F.E.A.R.

2005
low 640x480
100%
Radeon Xpress 200M:
48  fps
125%
Radeon Xpress 1250:
60  fps
med. 800x600
100%
Radeon Xpress 200M:
10  fps
120%
Radeon Xpress 1250:
12  fps
high 1024x768
100%
Radeon Xpress 200M:
3  fps
33%
Radeon Xpress 1250:
1  fps
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

1999
high 1024x768
100%
Radeon Xpress 200M:
82.5 87 ~ 85 fps
74%
Radeon Xpress 1250:
62.7  fps

Average Gaming ATI Radeon Xpress 200M → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming ATI Radeon Xpress 1250 → 88%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 99%

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 25. 10:04:56

#0 checking url part for id 50 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 77 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 24 Jun 2022 17:25:51 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.043s ... 0.044s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.045s

#6 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#8 composed specs +0s ... 0.045s

#9 did output specs +0s ... 0.045s

#10 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.045s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 50 +0.027s ... 0.073s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.074s

#13 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.074s

#14 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.075s

#15 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.075s

#16 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.076s

#17 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.077s

#18 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.077s

#19 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.079s

#20 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.079s

#21 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.08s

#22 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.082s

#23 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.082s

#24 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.082s

#25 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.084s

#26 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.084s

#27 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.084s

#28 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.085s

#29 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.086s

#30 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.086s

#31 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.086s

#32 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.087s

#33 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.088s

#34 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.089s

#35 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.089s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.09s

#37 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.09s

#38 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.091s

#39 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.093s

#40 got single benchmarks 50 +0.004s ... 0.097s

#41 getting avg benchmarks for device 77 +0s ... 0.097s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.097s

#43 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.1s

#44 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.102s

#45 got single benchmarks 77 +0.005s ... 0.106s

#46 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.106s

#47 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.107s

#48 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.107s

#49 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.107s

#50 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.107s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.107s

#52 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.107s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.108s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.108s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.108s

#56 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.108s

#57 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.108s

#58 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.108s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.108s

#60 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.108s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.108s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.108s

#63 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.109s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.109s

#65 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.109s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.109s

#67 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.11s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.11s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.11s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.111s

#71 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.111s

#72 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.111s

#73 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.112s

#74 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.112s

#75 Got 9 rows for game benchmarks. +0.003s ... 0.114s

#76 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.114s

#77 got data and put it in $dataArray +0s ... 0.115s

#78 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.117s

#79 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.117s

#80 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.117s

#81 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.117s

#82 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.117s

#83 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.117s

#84 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.118s

#85 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.118s

#86 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.118s

#87 benchmarks composed for output. +0s ... 0.118s

#88 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.118s

#89 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.118s

#90 return log +0.002s ... 0.121s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)