Notebookcheck Logo

ATI Radeon Xpress 200M vs ATI Radeon Xpress 1150

ATI Radeon Xpress 200M

► remove from comparison ATI Radeon Xpress 200M

ATI Radeon Xpress 200M is the shared memory integrated graphic card from ATI. It is a derivate of the Mobility Radeon X300 graphic card, but slower because of the lack of own memory and slower clock speed. Sometimes it is called Mobility Radeon X200. It is a bit faster than the Intel GMA 950 graphic core and threrefore not really suited for actual gaming.

ATI Radeon Xpress 1150

► remove from comparison ATI Radeon Xpress 1150

The successor of the Xpress M200 integrated shared memory graphic card for notebooks from ATI shows a good performane for graphic cards without own memory. According ATI, integrated X300 graphics are implemented. The Xpress 1150 is the faster clocked version (Xpress 1100 is slower clocked). Furthermore it was praised as Windows Vista Premium Ready by ATI (shall support Aero Glass fully).

Supports the processors: Mobile Sempron, Mobile Athlon 64, Turion 64 (X2)


The performance is sufficient for elder games and the performance should be below a normal X300.

show full text
ATI Radeon Xpress 200MATI Radeon Xpress 1150
Radeon Xpress Series
Radeon Xpress 1250 compare 4/0 cores @ 0.4 GHz
Radeon Xpress 1150 2/4/2 cores @ 0.4 GHz
Radeon Xpress 200M 4/2 cores @ 0.35 GHz
Radeon Xpress 1100 compare 4/2 cores @ 0.3 GHz
Radeon Xpress 1250 compare 4/0 cores @ 0.4 GHz
Radeon Xpress 1150 2/4/2 cores @ 0.4 GHz
Radeon Xpress 200M 4/2 cores @ 0.35 GHz
Radeon Xpress 1100 compare 4/2 cores @ 0.3 GHz
Pipelines4 / 2 Pixel- / Vertexshader2/4 / 2 Pixel- / Vertexshader
Core Speed350 MHz400 MHz
Max. Amount of Memory0 (shared) MB
Shared Memorynoyes
APIDirectX 9b, Shader 2.0DirectX 9b, Shader 2.0
technology130 nm110 nm
FeaturesUp to 256 MB taken from main memory.
Date of Announcement18.02.2005 01.06.2006
InformationSame technical features as the X300 core.selben Features wie Mobility Radeon X300
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttp://www.ati.com/products/radeonxpress...http://www.ati.com/products/radeonxpress...
CodenameRS482M
Memory Typeshared Memory

Benchmarks

3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
min: 3200     avg: 4168     median: 4441 (5%)     max: 4863 Points
min: 2189     avg: 4279     median: 4712.5 (5%)     max: 5500 Points
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
min: 1100     avg: 1261     median: 1312 (1%)     max: 1370 Points
min: 592     avg: 1235     median: 1424 (1%)     max: 1500 Points
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 450     avg: 587     median: 648 (1%)     max: 663 Points
min: 416     avg: 633     median: 697.5 (1%)     max: 720 Points
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings + ATI Radeon Xpress 200M
3DMark 06
min: 140     avg: 193     median: 193 (0%)     max: 246 Points
3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings + ATI Radeon Xpress 1150
min: 150     avg: 195.3     median: 212 (0%)     max: 224 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + ATI Radeon Xpress 200M
3DMark 06
202 Points (0%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + ATI Radeon Xpress 1150
219 Points (0%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + ATI Radeon Xpress 200M
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
194 Points (1%)

Average Benchmarks ATI Radeon Xpress 200M → 100% n=5

Average Benchmarks ATI Radeon Xpress 1150 → 108% n=5

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

F.E.A.R.

F.E.A.R.

2005
low 640x480
100%
Radeon Xpress 200M:
48  fps
med. 800x600
100%
Radeon Xpress 200M:
10  fps
high 1024x768
100%
Radeon Xpress 200M:
3  fps
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

1999
high 1024x768
100%
Radeon Xpress 200M:
82.5 87 ~ 85 fps
100%
Radeon Xpress 1150:
81 89.5 ~ 85 fps

Average Gaming ATI Radeon Xpress 200M → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming ATI Radeon Xpress 1150 → 100%

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 26. 21:54:21

#0 checking url part for id 50 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 52 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 24 Jun 2022 17:25:51 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.118s ... 0.119s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.12s

#6 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.12s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.12s

#8 composed specs +0s ... 0.12s

#9 did output specs +0s ... 0.12s

#10 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.12s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 50 +0.037s ... 0.157s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.159s

#13 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.159s

#14 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.16s

#15 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.16s

#16 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.161s

#17 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.162s

#18 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.162s

#19 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.163s

#20 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.164s

#21 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.164s

#22 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.167s

#23 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.168s

#24 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.168s

#25 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.17s

#26 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.17s

#27 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.171s

#28 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.172s

#29 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.173s

#30 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.173s

#31 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.174s

#32 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.174s

#33 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.175s

#34 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.176s

#35 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.176s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.177s

#37 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.177s

#38 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.178s

#39 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.18s

#40 got single benchmarks 50 +0.005s ... 0.185s

#41 getting avg benchmarks for device 52 +0s ... 0.185s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.186s

#43 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.005s ... 0.191s

#44 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.193s

#45 got single benchmarks 52 +0.004s ... 0.197s

#46 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.197s

#47 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.197s

#48 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.197s

#49 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.198s

#50 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.198s

#51 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.198s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.198s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.198s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.199s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.199s

#56 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.199s

#57 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.199s

#58 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.199s

#59 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.199s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.199s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.199s

#62 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.199s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.199s

#64 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.199s

#65 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.2s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.2s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.2s

#68 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.2s

#69 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.2s

#70 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.2s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.201s

#72 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.201s

#73 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.201s

#74 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.201s

#75 Got 7 rows for game benchmarks. +0.004s ... 0.205s

#76 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.205s

#77 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.206s

#78 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.207s

#79 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.207s

#80 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.207s

#81 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.208s

#82 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.208s

#83 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.208s

#84 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.208s

#85 benchmarks composed for output. +0s ... 0.208s

#86 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.208s

#87 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.066s ... 0.274s

#88 return log +0.003s ... 0.277s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)