Notebookcheck Logo

ATI Radeon Xpress 1100 vs ATI Radeon Xpress 1250 vs ATI Radeon Xpress 1150

ATI Radeon Xpress 1100

► remove from comparison ATI Radeon Xpress 1100

The successor of the Xpress M200 integrated shared memory graphic card for notebooks from ATI shows a good performane for graphic cards without own memory. According ATI, integrated X300 graphics are implemented. The Xpress 1100 is the slower clocked version (Xpress 1150 is faster clocked). Furthermore it was praised as Windows Vista Premium Ready by ATI (shall support Aero Glass fully).

Supports the processors: Mobile Sempron, Mobile Athlon 64, Turion 64 (X2)

The performance is sufficient for elder games and the performance should be below a normal X300.

ATI Radeon Xpress 1250

► remove from comparison ATI Radeon Xpress 1250

The ATI Radeon Xpress 1250 is an integrated graphics card based on the dedicated X300 GPU but without dedicated graphics memory. It should be compatible with Windows Vista Aero.

ATI Radeon Xpress 1150

► remove from comparison ATI Radeon Xpress 1150

The successor of the Xpress M200 integrated shared memory graphic card for notebooks from ATI shows a good performane for graphic cards without own memory. According ATI, integrated X300 graphics are implemented. The Xpress 1150 is the faster clocked version (Xpress 1100 is slower clocked). Furthermore it was praised as Windows Vista Premium Ready by ATI (shall support Aero Glass fully).

Supports the processors: Mobile Sempron, Mobile Athlon 64, Turion 64 (X2)


The performance is sufficient for elder games and the performance should be below a normal X300.

show full text
ATI Radeon Xpress 1100ATI Radeon Xpress 1250ATI Radeon Xpress 1150
Radeon Xpress Series
Radeon Xpress 1250 4/0 cores @ 0.4 GHz
Radeon Xpress 1150 2/4/2 cores @ 0.4 GHz
Radeon Xpress 200M 4/2 cores @ 0.35 GHz
Radeon Xpress 1100 4/2 cores @ 0.3 GHz
Radeon Xpress 1250 4/0 cores @ 0.4 GHz
Radeon Xpress 1150 2/4/2 cores @ 0.4 GHz
Radeon Xpress 200M 4/2 cores @ 0.35 GHz
Radeon Xpress 1100 4/2 cores @ 0.3 GHz
Radeon Xpress 1250 4/0 cores @ 0.4 GHz
Radeon Xpress 1150 2/4/2 cores @ 0.4 GHz
Radeon Xpress 200M 4/2 cores @ 0.35 GHz
Radeon Xpress 1100 4/2 cores @ 0.3 GHz
Pipelines4 / 2 Pixel- / Vertexshader4 / 0 Pixel- / Vertexshader2/4 / 2 Pixel- / Vertexshader
Core Speed300 MHz400 MHz400 MHz
Memory Typeshared Memoryshared Memory
Shared Memorynoyesyes
APIDirectX 9b, Shader 2.0DirectX 9, Shader 2.0DirectX 9b, Shader 2.0
technology110 nm80 nm110 nm
Date of Announcement01.06.2006 30.08.2006 01.06.2006
Informationselben Features wie Mobility Radeon X300selben Features wie Mobility Radeon X300
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.ati.comati.amd.comwww.ati.com
Features

Avivo Display, Multimonitor Support, Windows Vista Premium Ready (Aero), MPEG-2 Hardware Decoder, optional HDMI output possible

CodenameRS482M

Benchmarks

3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
4127 Points (4%)
min: 3940     avg: 4654     median: 4576 (5%)     max: 5447 Points
min: 2189     avg: 4279     median: 4712.5 (5%)     max: 5500 Points
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
min: 1100     avg: 1215     median: 1215 (1%)     max: 1330 Points
min: 1310     avg: 1976     median: 2006 (1%)     max: 2580 Points
min: 592     avg: 1235     median: 1424 (1%)     max: 1500 Points
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 335     avg: 367     median: 367 (0%)     max: 399 Points
min: 869     avg: 988     median: 928 (1%)     max: 1167 Points
min: 416     avg: 633     median: 697.5 (1%)     max: 720 Points
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings + ATI Radeon Xpress 1100
3DMark 06
min: 71     avg: 97     median: 97 (0%)     max: 123 Points
3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings + ATI Radeon Xpress 1150
min: 150     avg: 195.3     median: 212 (0%)     max: 224 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + ATI Radeon Xpress 1250
3DMark 06
445 Points (1%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + ATI Radeon Xpress 1150
219 Points (0%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x800 + ATI Radeon Xpress 1250
3DMark 06
min: 290     avg: 305     median: 305 (0%)     max: 320 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Grafik (Spiele)
3.5 Points (51%)
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Grafik
4.2 Points (62%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + ATI Radeon Xpress 1250
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
669 Points (0%)

Average Benchmarks ATI Radeon Xpress 1100 → 100% n=3

Average Benchmarks ATI Radeon Xpress 1250 → 176% n=3

Average Benchmarks ATI Radeon Xpress 1150 → 140% n=3

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

F.E.A.R.

F.E.A.R.

2005
low 640x480
Radeon Xpress 1250:
60  fps
med. 800x600
Radeon Xpress 1250:
12  fps
high 1024x768
Radeon Xpress 1250:
1  fps
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

1999
high 1024x768
100%
Radeon Xpress 1100:
61.4  fps
102%
Radeon Xpress 1250:
62.7  fps
138%
Radeon Xpress 1150:
81 89.5 ~ 85 fps

Average Gaming ATI Radeon Xpress 1100 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming ATI Radeon Xpress 1250 → 102%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 102%

Average Gaming ATI Radeon Xpress 1150 → 138%

ATI Radeon Xpress 1250lowmed.highultraQHD4K
F.E.A.R.60121
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo62.7
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

1
1


1

1









ATI Radeon Xpress 1100lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo61.4
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps







1









ATI Radeon Xpress 1150lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo85
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps







1









For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.26
log 19. 03:05:01

#0 checking url part for id 51 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 77 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 52 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 16 Apr 2024 05:39:00 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.124s ... 0.125s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.125s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.125s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 51 +0.037s ... 0.162s

#9 got single benchmarks 51 +0.017s ... 0.179s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 77 +0.002s ... 0.181s

#11 got single benchmarks 77 +0.02s ... 0.201s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 52 +0.002s ... 0.203s

#13 got single benchmarks 52 +0.017s ... 0.22s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.22s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.257s ... 0.478s

#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.478s

#17 Got 7 rows for game benchmarks. +0.003s ... 0.481s

#18 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.481s

#19 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.482s

#20 benchmarks composed for output. +0.005s ... 0.487s

#21 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.487s

#22 return log +0.002s ... 0.489s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)