Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Radeon R9 M390X vs AMD Radeon R9 M385

AMD Radeon R9 M390X

► remove from comparison AMD Radeon R9 M390X

The AMD Radeon R9 M390X is a mobile high-end graphics card for laptops. It is most likely based on the same chip as the AMD Radeon R9 M295X in the iMac 5K Late 2014. That means it should be based on the third generation of GCN (desktop Tonga chip). The amount of shader cores is identical but the core clock is reduced by 15% (from 850 MHz to 723 MHz) and the memory is also clocked slower (5448 MHz vs 5000 MHz).

The performance should be a bit below the M295X. Compared to the competition, the R9-M390X should be positioned somewhere between the GeForce GTX 965M and 970M and therefore suitable for high-end games in 1080p resolution and high detail settings.

The card was first mentioned by Alienware on their twitter account and should feature 4GB VRAM according to the tweet.

The power consumption should be rated around 100 Watt TDP and therefore suited only for large and bulky laptops (like the Alienware M17x it was announced in).

AMD Radeon R9 M385

► remove from comparison

The AMD Radeon R9 M385 is a mid-range notebook graphics card for laptops. It features a GCN (Graphics Core Next) based architecture and is manufactured in 28nm. Up to now only a GFXBench 3.1 OpenGL benchmarks leaked.

The most likely a bit slower Radeon R9 M380 features 12 compute cores clocked at 1 GHz and a GDDR5 memory controller. According to the naming, the performance should be quite similar to it.

AMD Radeon R9 M390XAMD Radeon R9 M385
Radeon R9 M300 Series
Radeon R9 M395X compare 2048 @ 0.91 GHz256 Bit @ 5460 MHz
Radeon R9 M390X 2048 @ 0.72 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Radeon R9 M395 compare 1792 @ 0.83 GHz256 Bit @ 5460 MHz
Radeon R9 M390 compare 1024 @ 0.96 GHz256 Bit @ 5460 MHz
Radeon R9 M385X compare 896 @ 1.1 GHz128 Bit @ 6000 MHz
Radeon R9 M385128 Bit @ 6000 MHz
Radeon R9 M380 compare 768 @ 1 GHz128 Bit @ 6000 MHz
Radeon R9 M370X compare 640 @ 0.8 GHz128 Bit @ 4500 MHz
Radeon R9 M365X compare 640 @ 0.9 - 0.93 GHz128 Bit @ 4500 MHz
Radeon R9 M375 compare 640 @ 1.02 GHz128 Bit @ 2200 MHz
Radeon R9 M395X compare 2048 @ 0.91 GHz256 Bit @ 5460 MHz
Radeon R9 M390X 2048 @ 0.72 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Radeon R9 M395 compare 1792 @ 0.83 GHz256 Bit @ 5460 MHz
Radeon R9 M390 compare 1024 @ 0.96 GHz256 Bit @ 5460 MHz
Radeon R9 M385X compare 896 @ 1.1 GHz128 Bit @ 6000 MHz
Radeon R9 M385128 Bit @ 6000 MHz
Radeon R9 M380 compare 768 @ 1 GHz128 Bit @ 6000 MHz
Radeon R9 M370X compare 640 @ 0.8 GHz128 Bit @ 4500 MHz
Radeon R9 M365X compare 640 @ 0.9 - 0.93 GHz128 Bit @ 4500 MHz
Radeon R9 M375 compare 640 @ 1.02 GHz128 Bit @ 2200 MHz
CodenameAmethyst (XT) / Tonga
ArchitectureGCN 3GCN
Pipelines2048 - unified
Core Speed723 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed5000 MHz6000 MHz
Memory Bus Width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5GDDR5
Max. Amount of Memory4 GB4 GB
Shared Memorynono
APIDirectX 12 (FL 12_0), Shader 5.0, OpenGL 4.3 / VulkanDirectX 11.1, Shader 5.0, OpenGL 4.3
Power Consumption125 Watt
Transistors5 Billion1.5 Billion
technology28 nm28 nm
FeaturesDirectX 12, OpenCL 1.2, OpenGL 4.3, Vulkan, MantleDirectCompute 5.0, OpenCL
Notebook Sizelargemedium sized
Date of Announcement09.06.2015 16.06.2015

Benchmarks

3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
9082 Points (18%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
9448 Points (14%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Radeon R9 M390X → NAN% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 26. 10:48:50

#0 checking url part for id 6372 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 6419 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 24 Jun 2022 17:25:51 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.055s ... 0.055s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.057s

#6 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#14 composed specs +0s ... 0.057s

#15 did output specs +0s ... 0.057s

#16 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.057s

#17 getting avg benchmarks for device 6372 +0.027s ... 0.085s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.085s

#19 got single benchmarks 6372 +0.004s ... 0.089s

#20 getting avg benchmarks for device 6419 +0s ... 0.09s

#21 got single benchmarks 6419 +0s ... 0.09s

#22 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.09s

#23 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.09s

#24 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.09s

#25 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.09s

#26 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.09s

#27 Got 0 rows for game benchmarks. +0.001s ... 0.092s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.093s

#29 return log +0.002s ... 0.095s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)