Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Radeon R9 M385 vs AMD Radeon R9 M395

AMD Radeon R9 M385

► remove from comparison

The AMD Radeon R9 M385 is a mid-range notebook graphics card for laptops. It features a GCN (Graphics Core Next) based architecture and is manufactured in 28nm. Up to now only a GFXBench 3.1 OpenGL benchmarks leaked.

The most likely a bit slower Radeon R9 M380 features 12 compute cores clocked at 1 GHz and a GDDR5 memory controller. According to the naming, the performance should be quite similar to it.

AMD Radeon R9 M395

► remove from comparison

The AMD Radeon R9 M395 is a high-end mobile graphics card that can be found in the 2015 iMac 5K 27-inch. It offers 1792 shader cores (28 compute cores) clocked at 834 MHz. The 2 GB GDDR5 dedicated graphics memory is connected with a 256 Bit bus at 1365 (= 5460 effective) MHz.

The performance should be between the older Radeon R9 M295X and the Desktop Radeon R7 370. Therefore, demanding Windows games like Fallout 4 or Call of Duty: Black Ops 3 should run in maximum details at 1920x1080 (with no headroom).

AMD Radeon R9 M385AMD Radeon R9 M395
Radeon R9 M300 Series
Radeon R9 M395X compare 2048 @ 0.91 GHz256 Bit @ 5460 MHz
Radeon R9 M390X compare 2048 @ 0.72 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Radeon R9 M395 1792 @ 0.83 GHz256 Bit @ 5460 MHz
Radeon R9 M390 compare 1024 @ 0.96 GHz256 Bit @ 5460 MHz
Radeon R9 M385X compare 896 @ 1.1 GHz128 Bit @ 6000 MHz
Radeon R9 M385128 Bit @ 6000 MHz
Radeon R9 M380 compare 768 @ 1 GHz128 Bit @ 6000 MHz
Radeon R9 M370X compare 640 @ 0.8 GHz128 Bit @ 4500 MHz
Radeon R9 M365X compare 640 @ 0.9 - 0.93 GHz128 Bit @ 4500 MHz
Radeon R9 M375 compare 640 @ 1.02 GHz128 Bit @ 2200 MHz
Radeon R9 M395X compare 2048 @ 0.91 GHz256 Bit @ 5460 MHz
Radeon R9 M390X compare 2048 @ 0.72 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Radeon R9 M395 1792 @ 0.83 GHz256 Bit @ 5460 MHz
Radeon R9 M390 compare 1024 @ 0.96 GHz256 Bit @ 5460 MHz
Radeon R9 M385X compare 896 @ 1.1 GHz128 Bit @ 6000 MHz
Radeon R9 M385128 Bit @ 6000 MHz
Radeon R9 M380 compare 768 @ 1 GHz128 Bit @ 6000 MHz
Radeon R9 M370X compare 640 @ 0.8 GHz128 Bit @ 4500 MHz
Radeon R9 M365X compare 640 @ 0.9 - 0.93 GHz128 Bit @ 4500 MHz
Radeon R9 M375 compare 640 @ 1.02 GHz128 Bit @ 2200 MHz
ArchitectureGCNGCN
Memory Speed6000 MHz5460 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5GDDR5
Max. Amount of Memory4 GB2048 MB
Shared Memorynono
APIDirectX 11.1, Shader 5.0, OpenGL 4.3DirectX 12 (FL 12_0), Shader 5.0, OpenGL 4.3 / Vulkan
Transistors1.5 Billion5 Billion
technology28 nm28 nm
FeaturesDirectCompute 5.0, OpenCLDirectX 12, OpenCL 1.2, OpenGL 4.3, Vulkan, Mantle
Notebook Sizemedium sizedlarge
Date of Announcement16.06.2015 09.06.2015
Pipelines1792 - unified
Core Speed834 MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - Radeon R9 M395
18.3 pt (20%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
16305 Points (20%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
38490 Points (16%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
5920 Points (15%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
6819 Points (13%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
203122 Points (27%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
8305 Points (17%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
8656 Points (12%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Radeon R9 M395 → NAN% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 01. 03:59:34

#0 checking url part for id 6419 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 6937 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 29 Jun 2022 17:25:55 +0200 +0s ... 0.001s

#4 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.043s ... 0.043s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.044s

#6 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#14 composed specs +0s ... 0.044s

#15 did output specs +0s ... 0.044s

#16 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.044s

#17 getting avg benchmarks for device 6419 +0.029s ... 0.073s

#18 got single benchmarks 6419 +0s ... 0.074s

#19 getting avg benchmarks for device 6937 +0.008s ... 0.082s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.082s

#21 got single benchmarks 6937 +0.004s ... 0.086s

#22 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.086s

#23 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.086s

#24 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.086s

#25 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.087s

#26 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.087s

#27 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.087s

#28 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.088s

#29 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.088s

#30 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.088s

#31 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.088s

#32 Got 0 rows for game benchmarks. +0.001s ... 0.09s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.091s

#34 return log +0.002s ... 0.093s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)