Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Radeon R9 M365X vs AMD Radeon R9 M390X

AMD Radeon R9 M365X

► remove from comparison AMD Radeon R9 M365X

The AMD Radeon R9 M365X is a mid range DirectX 12 compatible graphics card for laptops. It is based on the GCN architecture and manufactured in 28nm. The older Radeon R9 M270 and the current Radeon R9 M370X are very similar (see for gaming benchmarks).

The R9 M365X uses 640 shader cores (10 compute units) clocked at 925 MHz (max.) and supports according to the AMD website 4 GB GDDR5 at 1125 MHz (4 GHz effective). The only used version in a Toshiba laptop so far however only uses 2 GB GDDR5.

AMD Radeon R9 M390X

► remove from comparison AMD Radeon R9 M390X

The AMD Radeon R9 M390X is a mobile high-end graphics card for laptops. It is most likely based on the same chip as the AMD Radeon R9 M295X in the iMac 5K Late 2014. That means it should be based on the third generation of GCN (desktop Tonga chip). The amount of shader cores is identical but the core clock is reduced by 15% (from 850 MHz to 723 MHz) and the memory is also clocked slower (5448 MHz vs 5000 MHz).

The performance should be a bit below the M295X. Compared to the competition, the R9-M390X should be positioned somewhere between the GeForce GTX 965M and 970M and therefore suitable for high-end games in 1080p resolution and high detail settings.

The card was first mentioned by Alienware on their twitter account and should feature 4GB VRAM according to the tweet.

The power consumption should be rated around 100 Watt TDP and therefore suited only for large and bulky laptops (like the Alienware M17x it was announced in).

AMD Radeon R9 M365XAMD Radeon R9 M390X
Radeon R9 M300 Series
Radeon R9 M395X compare 2048 @ 0.91 GHz256 Bit @ 5460 MHz
Radeon R9 M390X 2048 @ 0.72 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Radeon R9 M395 compare 1792 @ 0.83 GHz256 Bit @ 5460 MHz
Radeon R9 M390 compare 1024 @ 0.96 GHz256 Bit @ 5460 MHz
Radeon R9 M385X compare 896 @ 1.1 GHz128 Bit @ 6000 MHz
Radeon R9 M385 compare128 Bit @ 6000 MHz
Radeon R9 M380 compare 768 @ 1 GHz128 Bit @ 6000 MHz
Radeon R9 M370X compare 640 @ 0.8 GHz128 Bit @ 4500 MHz
Radeon R9 M365X 640 @ 0.9 - 0.93 GHz128 Bit @ 4500 MHz
Radeon R9 M375 compare 640 @ 1.02 GHz128 Bit @ 2200 MHz
Radeon R9 M395X compare 2048 @ 0.91 GHz256 Bit @ 5460 MHz
Radeon R9 M390X 2048 @ 0.72 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Radeon R9 M395 compare 1792 @ 0.83 GHz256 Bit @ 5460 MHz
Radeon R9 M390 compare 1024 @ 0.96 GHz256 Bit @ 5460 MHz
Radeon R9 M385X compare 896 @ 1.1 GHz128 Bit @ 6000 MHz
Radeon R9 M385 compare128 Bit @ 6000 MHz
Radeon R9 M380 compare 768 @ 1 GHz128 Bit @ 6000 MHz
Radeon R9 M370X compare 640 @ 0.8 GHz128 Bit @ 4500 MHz
Radeon R9 M365X 640 @ 0.9 - 0.93 GHz128 Bit @ 4500 MHz
Radeon R9 M375 compare 640 @ 1.02 GHz128 Bit @ 2200 MHz
ArchitectureGCNGCN 3
Pipelines640 - unified2048 - unified
Core Speed900 - 925 (Boost) MHz723 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed4500 MHz5000 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5GDDR5
Max. Amount of Memory4 GB4 GB
Shared Memorynono
APIDirectX 12, Shader 5.0, OpenGL 4.4DirectX 12 (FL 12_0), Shader 5.0, OpenGL 4.3 / Vulkan
technology28 nm28 nm
FeaturesMantle, PCIe 3.0, Zero Core, PowerTuneDirectX 12, OpenCL 1.2, OpenGL 4.3, Vulkan, Mantle
Notebook Sizemedium sizedlarge
Date of Announcement06.05.2015 09.06.2015
CodenameAmethyst (XT) / Tonga
Power Consumption125 Watt
Transistors5 Billion

Benchmarks

3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
9082 Points (18%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
9448 Points (13%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Radeon R9 M390X → NAN% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.18
log 29. 16:34:54

#0 checking url part for id 7166 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 6372 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 27 Sep 2022 17:27:11 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.042s ... 0.043s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.005s ... 0.047s

#6 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#14 composed specs +0s ... 0.048s

#15 did output specs +0s ... 0.048s

#16 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.048s

#17 getting avg benchmarks for device 7166 +0.026s ... 0.073s

#18 got single benchmarks 7166 +0s ... 0.074s

#19 getting avg benchmarks for device 6372 +0s ... 0.074s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.074s

#21 got single benchmarks 6372 +0.004s ... 0.079s

#22 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.079s

#23 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.079s

#24 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.079s

#25 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.08s

#26 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.08s

#27 Got 0 rows for game benchmarks. +0.001s ... 0.081s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.082s

#29 return log +0.002s ... 0.084s

Please share our article, every link counts!
.170
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)