, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

AMD Radeon Pro 560 vs AMD Radeon Pro 555X

AMD Radeon Pro 560

► remove from comparison AMD Radeon Pro 560

The AMD Radeon Pro 560 is a mobile graphics card based on the small Polaris 21 chip (not verified) from AMD. It is an option for the 15-inch Apple MacBook Pro (Mid 2017) and is probably very similar to the Radeon Pro 460 (except for the slightly improved process for the new Polaris 21 chip). It is similar to the desktop Radeon RX 460, but not with all 1024 shader units.

Compared to the slower Radeon Pro 555 (entry-level model), the Radeon pro 460 is equipped with 4 GB GDDR5 memory. The average gaming performance in Windows of the Radeon Pro 460 is just above the GeForce GTX 960M and below an average GTX 965M ein. Compared to the slightly raised clocks of the desktop 500-series models, the Radeon Pro 560 should only be slightly faster.

The mobile Radeon Pro 560 should support all features of the desktop RX 460/560 like DisplayPort 1.2 (Polaris actually supports up to 1.4), HDMI 2.0 (via USB-C adapter), new H.265 video de- and encoder as well as architectural improvements. More information about the Polaris architecture is available in our dedicated review.

The Polaris 21 chip is manufactured in a slightly improved 14nm FinFET process according to AMD. The power consumption of the Radeon Pro 460 is 35 Watts according to AMD, so this should also be the case for the Pro 560.

AMD Radeon Pro 555X

► remove from comparison AMD Radeon Pro 555X

The AMD Radeon Pro 555X is a mobile graphics card based on the small Polaris 21 chip from AMD. It is available in the 15-inch Apple MacBook Pro (Mid 2018 model with Coffee Lake) and is the performance is similar to the old Radeon Pro 455 / 555. The difference is the slightly higher clock rate of 907 MHz versus 855 MHz (+6%) and the bigger graphics memory (4 GB versus 2 GB GDDR5). The Polaris 21 chip is produced in a 14nm FinFET process and is the smaller Polaris chip.

Both the performance and the power consumption are roughly on par with the Nvidia GeForce MX150 (laptop version of the GT 1030), which is also equipped with 2 GB GDDR5-VRAM.

More information about the Polaris architecture is available in our dedicated article. More benchmarks including gaming tests are listed on the dedicated page for the similarly powerful Radeon Pro 555Radeon Pro 455.

AMD Radeon Pro 560AMD Radeon Pro 555X
ManufacturerAMDAMD
Radeon RX 500M Series
Radeon Pro 560 1024 @ 0.91 GHz128 Bit @ 5080 MHz
Radeon Pro 555X 768 @ 0.86 GHz128 Bit @ 5080 MHz
Radeon Pro 555 compare 768 @ 0.86 GHz128 Bit @ 5080 MHz
Radeon Pro 560 1024 @ 0.91 GHz128 Bit @ 5080 MHz
Radeon Pro 555X 768 @ 0.86 GHz128 Bit @ 5080 MHz
Radeon Pro 555 compare 768 @ 0.86 GHz128 Bit @ 5080 MHz
CodenamePolaris 21Polaris 21
ArchitecturePolarisPolaris
Pipelines1024 - unified768 - unified
Core Speed907 MHz855 MHz
Memory Speed5080 MHz5080 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5GDDR5
Max. Amount of Memory4096 MB2048 MB
Shared Memorynono
DirectXDirectX 12DirectX 12
Transistors3000 Million3000 Million
technology14 nm14 nm
FeaturesDisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready, HDMI 2.0, AMD FreeSyncDisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready, HDMI 2.0, AMD FreeSync
Notebook Sizelargelarge
Date of Announcement05.06.2017 05.06.2017

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
1519 Points (8%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
1376 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
198867 Points (31%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
15047 Points (20%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
23105 Points (11%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
3576 Points (9%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
3892 Points (8%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
5718 Points (13%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
5305 Points (9%)
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + AMD Radeon Pro 560
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
18982 Points (19%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + AMD Radeon Pro 560
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
17782 Points (16%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1024x768 + AMD Radeon Pro 560
3DMark 06
24516 Points (46%)
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
18.2 fps (9%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + AMD Radeon Pro 560
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
9792 (46%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + AMD Radeon Pro 560
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
74.3 fps (32%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + AMD Radeon Pro 560
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
86.8 fps (24%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + AMD Radeon Pro 560
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.5 % (100%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + AMD Radeon Pro 560
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
284 fps (2%)
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + AMD Radeon Pro 560
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16
59.5 fps (2%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
70 fps (8%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan
41.9 fps (11%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
79.4 fps (0%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Onscreen
31.1 fps (1%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
686 Samples/s (7%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
1323 Samples/s (4%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
3756 (8%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Radeon Pro 560 → NAN% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.16
log 18. 15:24:46

#0 checking url part for id 8066 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 8892 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 17 Sep 2021 17:22:03 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.048s ... 0.048s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.048s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.048s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 8066 +0.024s ... 0.073s

#8 got single benchmarks 8066 +0.006s ... 0.078s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 8892 +0s ... 0.079s

#10 got single benchmarks 8892 +0.004s ... 0.082s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.082s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.008s ... 0.09s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.09s

#14 Got 0 rows for game benchmarks. +0.002s ... 0.091s

#15 return log +0.003s ... 0.094s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)