ERROR: No GPU found with the ID:340

getGPUInfos: Perhaps the translation is missing or the German GPU is not selected in the page header (or a wrong one is selected) ATI Radeon IGP 340M vs vs ATI Mobility Radeon 9000 IGP
Notebookcheck Logo

ATI Radeon IGP 340M vs vs ATI Mobility Radeon 9000 IGP

ATI Radeon IGP 340M

► remove from comparison

The ATI Radeon IGP 340M is an onboard (shared memory) graphics card for Intel Pentium 4M based laptops. It features an integrated Mobility Radeon M6 graphics core without Hardware T&L. The IGP320M is able to steer up to two displays (using Hydravision).

A review of the similar IGP 320M (Athlon XP version, with a bit different clock speed) with benchmarks can be found at Tomshardware.

 

► remove from comparison

ATI Mobility Radeon 9000 IGP

► remove from comparison

The ATI Radeon 9100 (PRO) IGP is an onboard (shared memory) graphics card with the Codename RS350. The chip supports DirectX 8.1 and is therefore not suited for Aero effects (Windows Vista upwards). Compared to the ATI Radeon 9100 IGP, the 9000 supports only single channel main memory.

show full text
ATI Radeon IGP 340MATI Mobility Radeon 9000 IGP
Mobility Radeon IGP Series
Mobility Radeon 9100 IGP 2/1 cores @ 0.4 GHz
Mobility Radeon 9000 IGP 2/1 cores @ 0.3 GHz
Mobility Radeon 7000 IGP
Radeon IGP 340M @ 0.18 GHz
Radeon IGP 320M @ 0.16 GHz
Mobility Radeon 9100 IGP 2/1 cores @ 0.4 GHz
Mobility Radeon 9000 IGP 2/1 cores @ 0.3 GHz
Mobility Radeon 7000 IGP
Radeon IGP 340M @ 0.18 GHz
Radeon IGP 320M @ 0.16 GHz
Pipelines0 / 2 Pixel- / Vertexshader2 / 1 Pixel- / Vertexshader
Core Speed180 MHz300 MHz
Shared Memoryyesno
APIDirectX 7DirectX 8.1
Features
  • HyperZ™ memory optimization technology
  • Pixel Tapestry™ architecture
  • Multi-texturing with 3 texture units
  • On-chip texel, pixel, and vertex caches
  • Supports 3D textures and Microsoft® DirectX® texture compression
  • Support for Emboss, Dot-Product 3, and Cubic Environment bump mapping
  • Bilinear, trilinear and anisotropic texture filtering
  • Full Screen Anti-Aliasing (FSAA)
  • Alpha blending
  • Exponential pixel fog
  • 32-bit or 16-bit Z buffer, 32-bit or 16-bit W buffer, and 8-bit Stencil buffer
  • Extensive 3D mode support
  • Optimized for full performance in true color triple buffered 32BPP acceleration modes
  • Hardware with Pixel Shader 1.4 support
  • Supports up to 2048x1536 @ 32bpp.
  • Anisotropic texture filtering and Full Screen Anti-Aliasing (FSAA)
Date of Announcement05.10.2002 01.05.2003
Link to Manufacturer Pageati.amd.comati.amd.com
CodenameRC350

Benchmarks

3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
1235 Points (1%)
7450 Points (8%)
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
55.1 Points (0%)
min: 500     avg: 707     median: 706.5 (0%)     max: 913 Points

Average Benchmarks ATI Radeon IGP 340M → 0% n=

Average Benchmarks ATI Mobility Radeon 9000 IGP → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.26
log 20. 05:10:14

#0 checking url part for id 172 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 340 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 174 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 19 Apr 2024 05:40:26 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.16s ... 0.161s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.161s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.161s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 172 +0.058s ... 0.22s

#9 got single benchmarks 172 +0.007s ... 0.227s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 340 +0.002s ... 0.229s

#11 got single benchmarks 340 +0s ... 0.229s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 174 +0.002s ... 0.232s

#13 got single benchmarks 174 +0.007s ... 0.238s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.238s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.009s ... 0.247s

#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.247s

#17 Got 0 rows for game benchmarks. +0.002s ... 0.249s

#18 return log +0.002s ... 0.251s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)