ERROR: No GPU found with the ID:340

getGPUInfos: Perhaps the translation is missing or the German GPU is not selected in the page header (or a wrong one is selected) ATI Radeon IGP 340M vs vs ATI Mobility Radeon 7000 IGP
Notebookcheck Logo

ATI Radeon IGP 340M vs vs ATI Mobility Radeon 7000 IGP

ATI Radeon IGP 340M

► remove from comparison

The ATI Radeon IGP 340M is an onboard (shared memory) graphics card for Intel Pentium 4M based laptops. It features an integrated Mobility Radeon M6 graphics core without Hardware T&L. The IGP320M is able to steer up to two displays (using Hydravision).

A review of the similar IGP 320M (Athlon XP version, with a bit different clock speed) with benchmarks can be found at Tomshardware.

 

ATI Mobility Radeon 7000 IGP

► remove from comparison

The ATI Mobilty Radeon 7000 IGP is an onboard (shared memory) graphics card for Intel Pentium 4M based notebooks. It supports dual display and Powerplay. The integrated graphics core is based on the Mobility Radeon M6 (R100) core. Compared to the IGP 320M and 340M, the 7000 IGP is similar but classified a bit faster (performance class).

ATI Radeon IGP 340MATI Mobility Radeon 7000 IGP
Mobility Radeon IGP Series
Mobility Radeon 9100 IGP 2/1 cores @ 0.4 GHz
Mobility Radeon 9000 IGP 2/1 cores @ 0.3 GHz
Mobility Radeon 7000 IGP
Radeon IGP 340M @ 0.18 GHz
Radeon IGP 320M @ 0.16 GHz
Mobility Radeon 9100 IGP 2/1 cores @ 0.4 GHz
Mobility Radeon 9000 IGP 2/1 cores @ 0.3 GHz
Mobility Radeon 7000 IGP
Radeon IGP 340M @ 0.18 GHz
Radeon IGP 320M @ 0.16 GHz
Pipelines0 / 2 Pixel- / Vertexshader0 / 2 Pixel- / Vertexshader
Core Speed180 MHz
Shared Memoryyesyes
APIDirectX 7DirectX 7
Features
  • HyperZ™ memory optimization technology
  • Pixel Tapestry™ architecture
  • Multi-texturing with 3 texture units
  • On-chip texel, pixel, and vertex caches
  • Supports 3D textures and Microsoft® DirectX® texture compression
  • Support for Emboss, Dot-Product 3, and Cubic Environment bump mapping
  • Bilinear, trilinear and anisotropic texture filtering
  • Full Screen Anti-Aliasing (FSAA)
  • Alpha blending
  • Exponential pixel fog
  • 32-bit or 16-bit Z buffer, 32-bit or 16-bit W buffer, and 8-bit Stencil buffer
  • Extensive 3D mode support
  • Optimized for full performance in true color triple buffered 32BPP acceleration modes
HyperZ, FSAA, 32Bit ZBuffer
Date of Announcement05.10.2002 01.03.2003
Link to Manufacturer Pageati.amd.comati.amd.com
CodenameR100

Benchmarks

3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
1235 Points (1%)
min: 1450     avg: 1625     median: 1625 (2%)     max: 1800 Points
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
55.1 Points (0%)
min: 70     avg: 82.5     median: 82.5 (0%)     max: 95 Points

Average Benchmarks ATI Radeon IGP 340M → 0% n=

Average Benchmarks ATI Mobility Radeon 7000 IGP → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.26
log 28. 23:14:19

#0 checking url part for id 172 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 340 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 171 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 05:37:00 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.103s ... 0.104s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.104s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.104s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 172 +0.036s ... 0.139s

#9 got single benchmarks 172 +0.005s ... 0.145s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 340 +0.001s ... 0.146s

#11 got single benchmarks 340 +0s ... 0.146s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 171 +0.001s ... 0.148s

#13 got single benchmarks 171 +0.005s ... 0.153s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.153s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.008s ... 0.161s

#16 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.161s

#17 Got 0 rows for game benchmarks. +0.001s ... 0.162s

#18 return log +0.002s ... 0.164s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)