Notebookcheck Logo

ATI Radeon HD 4270 vs ATI Radeon HD 4225

ATI Radeon HD 4270

► remove from comparison

The AMD ATI Radeon HD 4270 (sometimes also ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4270 called) is an onboard (shared Memory) graphics chip in the RS880M chipset. It is based on the HD 3400 graphics core and features the UVD 2 video engine to decode HD videos (Avivo HD - can decode two HD streams simultaneously). Compared to the HD 4250, the 4270 is a higher clocked version.

Compared to the old HD 3200, the 4270 supports DirectX 10.1 and features the UVD2 video decoder.

The UVD 2 video engine is able to decode HD videos (H.264 and VC-1 in all stages, MPEG-2 only IDCT) and allows the fluent playback of HD videos (e.g. Blu-ray) with a relative low CPU utilization (called Avivo HD). The HD 3200 was the first onboard graphics card that allows the fluent playback of Blu-ray videos. The UVD 2 in the HD 4270 supports the decoding of two video stream and therefore got a full Blu-Ray support.

The graphics core of the HD 4270 stems from the Mobility Radeon HD 3400 series and is therefore DirectX 10.1 capable. Because of the missing graphics memory, the performance of the card is a bit lower than of the HD 34x0. Theroretically, dedicated memory chips can be directly added to the chip, making it a dedicated graphics card. Because of pricing it is unclear if any manufacturer will add memory to the chip.

Current (and less demanding games) like Starcraft 2 or Left4Dead are playable in low details in conjunction with a fast CPU. Furthermore older games like Doom 3 or Quake 4 should also be playable with slower processors. Compared to older onboad graphic chips (e.g., GMA 4500MHD), the HD 4270 is much faster. The new Intel HD Graphics in the Core ix Arrandale CPUs, offers a similar performance, but the driver support by AMD should be better.

ATI Radeon HD 4225

► remove from comparison

The AMD ATI Radeon HD 4225 (sometimes also ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4225 called) is an onboard (shared Memory) graphics chip in the RS880M chipset. It is based on the HD 3400 graphics core and features the UVD 2 video engine to decode HD videos (Avivo HD - can decode two HD streams simultaneously). Compared to the HD 4200 and 4250, the 4225 offers a worse performance due to the slow clock speed.

The UVD 2 video engine is able to decode HD videos (MPEG-2, H.264, and VC-1) in all stages and allows the fluent playback of HD videos (e.g. Blu-ray) with a relative low CPU utilization (called Avivo HD). The HD 3200 was the first onboard graphics card that allows the fluent playback of Blu-ray videos. The UVD 2 in the HD 4225 supports the decoding of two video stream and therefore got a full Blu-Ray support.

The graphics core of the HD 4225 stems from the Mobility Radeon HD 3400 series and is therefore DirectX 10.1 capable. Because of the missing graphics memory, the performance of the card is a bit lower than of the HD 34x0. Theroretically, dedicated memory chips can be directly added to the chip, making it a dedicated graphics card. Because of pricing it is unclear if any manufacturer will add memory to the chip.

Still older games like Doom 3 or Quake 4 should be barly playable

ATI Radeon HD 4270ATI Radeon HD 4225
Radeon HD 4000 Series
Radeon HD 4270 40 @ 0.59 GHz
Radeon HD 4250 compare 40 @ 0.5 GHz
Radeon HD 4200 compare 40 @ 0.5 GHz
Radeon HD 4225 40 @ 0.38 GHz
Radeon HD 4100 compare 40 @ 0.35 GHz
Radeon HD 4270 40 @ 0.59 GHz
Radeon HD 4250 compare 40 @ 0.5 GHz
Radeon HD 4200 compare 40 @ 0.5 GHz
Radeon HD 4225 40 @ 0.38 GHz
Radeon HD 4100 compare 40 @ 0.35 GHz
CodenameRS880MRS880M
ArchitectureRV6xxRV6xx
Pipelines40 - unified40 - unified
Core Speed590 MHz380 MHz
Max. Amount of Memory512 MB512 MB
Shared Memoryyesyes
APIDirectX 10.1, Shader 4.0DirectX 10.1, Shader 4.0
technology55 nm55 nm
FeaturesAvivo HD (UVD2), Hybrid Graphics Technology, PCI-E 2.0, Vari-Bright (Bildschirmhelligkeit automtisch anpassen), HDCP support, Display CacheAvivo HD (UVD2), Hybrid Graphics Technology, PCI-E 2.0, Vari-Bright (Bildschirmhelligkeit automtisch anpassen), HDCP support, Display Cache
Date of Announcement01.05.2010 01.05.2010

Benchmarks

3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + ATI Radeon HD 4270
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
230 Points (0%)
3DM Vant. Perf. total + ATI Radeon HD 4225
min: 116     avg: 146.5     median: 140.5 (0%)     max: 189 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + ATI Radeon HD 4270
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
179 Points (0%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + ATI Radeon HD 4225
min: 88     avg: 112     median: 107.5 (0%)     max: 145 Points
3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
min: 6129     avg: 6645     median: 6695 (7%)     max: 7061 Points
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
3668 Points (2%)
min: 2567     avg: 2771     median: 2812 (1%)     max: 2864 Points
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
2926 Points (3%)
min: 2071     avg: 2365     median: 2278.5 (2%)     max: 2868 Points
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + ATI Radeon HD 4270
3DMark 06
1402 Points (2%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + ATI Radeon HD 4225
min: 980     avg: 1093     median: 1053 (1%)     max: 1297 Points
3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings + ATI Radeon HD 4225
3DMark 06
1118 Points (1%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x768 + ATI Radeon HD 4225
3DMark 06
1181 Points (2%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Gaming graphics
5.3 Points (67%)
min: 4     avg: 4.9     median: 5 (63%)     max: 5.2 Points
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Graphics
3.7 Points (47%)
min: 3.2     avg: 3.6     median: 3.4 (43%)     max: 4.2 Points
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + ATI Radeon HD 4270
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
2220 Points (2%)
Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + ATI Radeon HD 4225
min: 1464     avg: 1684     median: 1665.5 (1%)     max: 1946 Points
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + ATI Radeon HD 4270
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
3.8 fps (1%)
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + ATI Radeon HD 4225
min: 2.1     avg: 2.6     median: 2.7 (1%)     max: 2.85 fps

Average Benchmarks ATI Radeon HD 4270 → 100% n=9

Average Benchmarks ATI Radeon HD 4225 → 76% n=9

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Sims 3

Sims 3

2009
low 800x600
Radeon HD 4225:
69.9 69.9 ~ 70 fps
med. 1024x768
Radeon HD 4225:
14.5  fps
Left 4 Dead

Left 4 Dead

2008
low 640x480
Radeon HD 4225:
26.3 26.3 29.6 33.7 ~ 29 fps
high 1024x768
Radeon HD 4225:
12 13.1 ~ 13 fps
Trackmania Nations Forever

Trackmania Nations Forever

2008
low 640x480
Radeon HD 4225:
77.6  fps
high 1024x768
Radeon HD 4225:
14.3  fps
Crysis - GPU Benchmark

Crysis - GPU Benchmark

2007
low 1024x768
Radeon HD 4225:
18.7  fps
Crysis - CPU Benchmark

Crysis - CPU Benchmark

2007
low 1024x768
Radeon HD 4225:
15.2  fps
World in Conflict - Benchmark

World in Conflict - Benchmark

2007
low 800x600
Radeon HD 4225:
28  fps
med. 1024x768
Radeon HD 4225:
4  fps
ATI Radeon HD 4225lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Sims 37014.5
Left 4 Dead2913
Trackmania Nations Forever77.614.3
Crysis - GPU Benchmark18.7
Crysis - CPU Benchmark15.2
World in Conflict - Benchmark284
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
4

2
2


2











For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 16. 11:00:54

#0 checking url part for id 1823 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 1821 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 16 Apr 2024 05:39:00 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.076s ... 0.077s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.077s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.077s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 1823 +0.024s ... 0.102s

#8 got single benchmarks 1823 +0.008s ... 0.11s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 1821 +0.001s ... 0.111s

#10 got single benchmarks 1821 +0.04s ... 0.152s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.152s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.216s ... 0.367s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.368s

#14 Got 15 rows for game benchmarks. +0.006s ... 0.374s

#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.374s

#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.003s ... 0.376s

#17 benchmarks composed for output. +0.016s ... 0.392s

#18 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.392s

#19 return log +0.071s ... 0.463s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)