Notebookcheck Logo

ATI Radeon HD 4250 vs ATI Radeon HD 4270

ATI Radeon HD 4250

► remove from comparison

The AMD ATI Radeon HD 4250 (sometimes also ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4250 called) is an onboard (shared Memory) graphics chip in the RS880M chipset. It is based on the HD 3400 graphics core and features the UVD 2 video engine to decode HD videos. Compared to the HD 4200, the 4250 offers a similar performance, but the power consumption could be a bit better.

Compared to the old HD 3200, the 4250 supports DirectX 10.1 and features the UVD2 video decoder.

The UVD 2 video engine is able to decode HD videos (H.264 and VC-1 in all stages, MPEG2 only IDCT) and allows the fluent playback of HD videos (e.g. Blu-ray) with a relative low CPU utilization (called Avivo HD). The UVD 2 in the HD 4250 supports the decoding of two video stream and therefore got a full Blu-Ray support.

The graphics core of the HD 4250 stems from the Mobility Radeon HD 3400 series and is therefore DirectX 10.1 capable. Because of the missing graphics memory, the performance of the card is a bit lower than of the HD 34x0. Theroretically, dedicated memory chips can be directly added to the chip, making it a dedicated graphics card (called sideport). Because of pricing it is unclear if any manufacturer will add memory to the chip.

The 3D performance is heavily depending on the used processor. With a fast Phenom II CPU for example less demanding games like Left 4 Dead or Starcraft 2 were playable in low settings and resolutions. With a slow V-Series CPU however, only old games like Doom 3 or Quake 4 should be playable. Compared to older onboad graphic chips (e.g., GMA 4500MHD), the HD 4250 is much faster. The new Intel HD Graphics in the Core ix Arrandale CPUs, offers a similar performance, but the driver support by AMD should be better.

The mobile Radeon HD 4250 should be identical to the desktop version (the desktop  hd 4250 may be minimal higher clocked), although faster processors used in desktop systems may lead to better benchmarks.

 

ATI Radeon HD 4270

► remove from comparison

The AMD ATI Radeon HD 4270 (sometimes also ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4270 called) is an onboard (shared Memory) graphics chip in the RS880M chipset. It is based on the HD 3400 graphics core and features the UVD 2 video engine to decode HD videos (Avivo HD - can decode two HD streams simultaneously). Compared to the HD 4250, the 4270 is a higher clocked version.

Compared to the old HD 3200, the 4270 supports DirectX 10.1 and features the UVD2 video decoder.

The UVD 2 video engine is able to decode HD videos (H.264 and VC-1 in all stages, MPEG-2 only IDCT) and allows the fluent playback of HD videos (e.g. Blu-ray) with a relative low CPU utilization (called Avivo HD). The HD 3200 was the first onboard graphics card that allows the fluent playback of Blu-ray videos. The UVD 2 in the HD 4270 supports the decoding of two video stream and therefore got a full Blu-Ray support.

The graphics core of the HD 4270 stems from the Mobility Radeon HD 3400 series and is therefore DirectX 10.1 capable. Because of the missing graphics memory, the performance of the card is a bit lower than of the HD 34x0. Theroretically, dedicated memory chips can be directly added to the chip, making it a dedicated graphics card. Because of pricing it is unclear if any manufacturer will add memory to the chip.

Current (and less demanding games) like Starcraft 2 or Left4Dead are playable in low details in conjunction with a fast CPU. Furthermore older games like Doom 3 or Quake 4 should also be playable with slower processors. Compared to older onboad graphic chips (e.g., GMA 4500MHD), the HD 4270 is much faster. The new Intel HD Graphics in the Core ix Arrandale CPUs, offers a similar performance, but the driver support by AMD should be better.

ATI Radeon HD 4250ATI Radeon HD 4270
Radeon HD 4000 Series
Radeon HD 4270 40 @ 0.59 GHz
Radeon HD 4250 40 @ 0.5 GHz
Radeon HD 4200 compare 40 @ 0.5 GHz
Radeon HD 4225 compare 40 @ 0.38 GHz
Radeon HD 4100 compare 40 @ 0.35 GHz
Radeon HD 4270 40 @ 0.59 GHz
Radeon HD 4250 40 @ 0.5 GHz
Radeon HD 4200 compare 40 @ 0.5 GHz
Radeon HD 4225 compare 40 @ 0.38 GHz
Radeon HD 4100 compare 40 @ 0.35 GHz
CodenameRS880MRS880M
ArchitectureRV6xxRV6xx
Pipelines40 - unified40 - unified
Core Speed500 MHz590 MHz
Max. Amount of Memory512 MB512 MB
Shared Memoryyesyes
APIDirectX 10.1, Shader 4.0DirectX 10.1, Shader 4.0
technology55 nm55 nm
FeaturesAvivo HD (UVD2), Hybrid Graphics Technology, PCI-E 2.0, Vari-Bright (Bildschirmhelligkeit automtisch anpassen), HDCP support, Display CacheAvivo HD (UVD2), Hybrid Graphics Technology, PCI-E 2.0, Vari-Bright (Bildschirmhelligkeit automtisch anpassen), HDCP support, Display Cache
Date of Announcement01.05.2010 01.05.2010

Benchmarks

3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + ATI Radeon HD 4250
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 194     avg: 227     median: 227 (0%)     max: 260 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. total + ATI Radeon HD 4270
230 Points (0%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + ATI Radeon HD 4250
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 147     avg: 172     median: 172 (0%)     max: 197 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + ATI Radeon HD 4270
179 Points (0%)
3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
min: 6344     avg: 7995     median: 8689 (9%)     max: 8953 Points
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
min: 2652     avg: 3622     median: 3754 (2%)     max: 4343 Points
3668 Points (2%)
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 2811     avg: 3127     median: 3103 (3%)     max: 3585 Points
2926 Points (3%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings + ATI Radeon HD 4250
3DMark 06
1738 Points (2%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1366x768 + ATI Radeon HD 4250
3DMark 06
1706 Points (2%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + ATI Radeon HD 4250
3DMark 06
min: 1016     avg: 1362     median: 1372 (2%)     max: 1652 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + ATI Radeon HD 4270
1402 Points (2%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1024x768 + ATI Radeon HD 4250
3DMark 06
2110 Points (3%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Gaming graphics
min: 4.2     avg: 5.1     median: 5.2 (66%)     max: 5.4 Points
5.3 Points (67%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Graphics
min: 3     avg: 3.7     median: 3.7 (47%)     max: 4.5 Points
3.7 Points (47%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + ATI Radeon HD 4250
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 1350     avg: 1940     median: 2117 (2%)     max: 2342 Points
Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + ATI Radeon HD 4270
2220 Points (2%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + ATI Radeon HD 4250
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 3.4     avg: 3.5     median: 3.5 (1%)     max: 3.62 fps
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + ATI Radeon HD 4270
3.8 fps (1%)

Average Benchmarks ATI Radeon HD 4250 → 100% n=9

Average Benchmarks ATI Radeon HD 4270 → 101% n=9

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1024x768
100%
Radeon HD 4250:
14 44 56 ~ 38 fps
med. 1360x768
100%
Radeon HD 4250:
9.6  fps
Risen

Risen

2009
low 800x600
100%
Radeon HD 4250:
13.1  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
Radeon HD 4250:
6.2  fps
Left 4 Dead

Left 4 Dead

2008
low 640x480
100%
Radeon HD 4250:
45  fps
high 1024x768
100%
Radeon HD 4250:
16  fps
Trackmania Nations Forever

Trackmania Nations Forever

2008
low 640x480
100%
Radeon HD 4250:
55  fps
high 1024x768
100%
Radeon HD 4250:
12  fps
World in Conflict - Benchmark

World in Conflict - Benchmark

2007
low 800x600
100%
Radeon HD 4250:
18 42 ~ 30 fps
med. 1024x768
100%
Radeon HD 4250:
4 14 ~ 9 fps
high 1024x768
100%
Radeon HD 4250:
5  fps
Half Life 2 - Lost Coast Benchmark

Half Life 2 - Lost Coast Benchmark

2005
high 1024x768
100%
Radeon HD 4250:
27  fps
World of Warcraft

World of Warcraft

2005
low 800x600
100%
Radeon HD 4250:
31  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
Radeon HD 4250:
17  fps

Average Gaming ATI Radeon HD 4250 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

ATI Radeon HD 4250lowmed.highultraQHD4K
StarCraft 2389.6
Risen13.146.22
Left 4 Dead4516
Trackmania Nations Forever5512
World in Conflict - Benchmark3095
Half Life 2 - Lost Coast Benchmark27
World of Warcraft3117
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
1
5

4


4











For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 29. 07:26:19

#0 checking url part for id 1789 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 1823 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 05:37:00 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.065s ... 0.066s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.066s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.066s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 1789 +0.022s ... 0.088s

#8 got single benchmarks 1789 +0.08s ... 0.168s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 1823 +0.001s ... 0.169s

#10 got single benchmarks 1823 +0.006s ... 0.175s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.175s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.239s ... 0.413s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.413s

#14 Got 18 rows for game benchmarks. +0.006s ... 0.419s

#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.419s

#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.003s ... 0.422s

#17 benchmarks composed for output. +0.018s ... 0.44s

#18 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.44s

#19 return log +0.042s ... 0.482s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)